Probing the in-depth analysis of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions in a tertiary care hospital of Central India

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Preeti Singh , Shekhar Verma , Yogesh Vaishnav , Usha Joshi , Manju Agrawal
{"title":"Probing the in-depth analysis of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions in a tertiary care hospital of Central India","authors":"Preeti Singh ,&nbsp;Shekhar Verma ,&nbsp;Yogesh Vaishnav ,&nbsp;Usha Joshi ,&nbsp;Manju Agrawal","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) represent a critical challenge in contemporary healthcare, necessitating comprehensive investigation and analysis. Within Central India, where healthcare systems grapple with unique demographic, epidemiological, and infrastructural dynamics, understanding the landscape of serious ADRs is paramount.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate serious ADRs related to age, gender, most implicated class of drugs &amp; single drug, hospital admission, most affected system organ classes, causality and outcome of reactions and fatalities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analysed serious individual case safety reports (ICSRs) recorded from January 2016 to December 2019 at the Department of Pharmacology, Pt. JNM Medical College, Raipur (ADR monitoring centre), and submitted to the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India database using VigiFlow® for further process. ADRs were collected from Dr. BRAM Hospital and DKS Hospital and recorded using the standard suspected ADR reporting form (version 1.4). Cases were classified as serious if they met at least one criterion from the WHO-UMC scale, with some cases meeting multiple criteria. Causality was assessed using the WHO-UMC scale, ensuring patient and reporter confidentiality. Descriptive statistics such as number and frequency were used to analyse serious ADRs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 762 ICSRs were entered into VigiFlow® during the study period, of which 239 (31.36 %) were classified as serious ADRs. The demographic distribution revealed a slight preponderance of females 125 (52.30 %) over males 113 (47.28 %). The hospital admissions due to ADRs were 57 (23.84 %). Antibiotics were the most commonly associated drug class (52.30 %), followed by Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (11.29 %). Among individual drugs, ceftriaxone and phenytoin were the most common drugs involved in serious ADRs. Adults were the most affected, 185 (77.40 %) compared to other age groups. The skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, system organ class (SOC)155 (46.55 %) was highly affected, while erythematous and maculopapular rashes were the most common. Eleven Stevens-Johnson syndrome cases and three toxic epidermal necrolysis cases, like specific ADRs, were also obtained. The most ADRs were probable 121 (50.60 %) and possible 100 (41.84 %) category.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the significant burden of serious ADRs within Central India, emphasising the need for heightened pharmacovigilance and targeted interventions, especially among adults. The prevalence of serious ADRs in females and adults and the impact on hospitalisations emphasise the need for cautious drug use, especially in inpatient settings. Limited understanding and reporting exist regarding the profile of serious ADRs in resource-limited countries. The findings will contribute to developing strategies for shaping future policies to promote the safer use of medicines. The under-reporting of ADRs in our setting and low-income countries is also a concern. Therefore, it is imperative to raise awareness about ADR reporting by healthcare professionals as well as patients to promote the safe utilisation of drugs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) represent a critical challenge in contemporary healthcare, necessitating comprehensive investigation and analysis. Within Central India, where healthcare systems grapple with unique demographic, epidemiological, and infrastructural dynamics, understanding the landscape of serious ADRs is paramount.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate serious ADRs related to age, gender, most implicated class of drugs & single drug, hospital admission, most affected system organ classes, causality and outcome of reactions and fatalities.

Methods

This retrospective study analysed serious individual case safety reports (ICSRs) recorded from January 2016 to December 2019 at the Department of Pharmacology, Pt. JNM Medical College, Raipur (ADR monitoring centre), and submitted to the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India database using VigiFlow® for further process. ADRs were collected from Dr. BRAM Hospital and DKS Hospital and recorded using the standard suspected ADR reporting form (version 1.4). Cases were classified as serious if they met at least one criterion from the WHO-UMC scale, with some cases meeting multiple criteria. Causality was assessed using the WHO-UMC scale, ensuring patient and reporter confidentiality. Descriptive statistics such as number and frequency were used to analyse serious ADRs.

Results

A total of 762 ICSRs were entered into VigiFlow® during the study period, of which 239 (31.36 %) were classified as serious ADRs. The demographic distribution revealed a slight preponderance of females 125 (52.30 %) over males 113 (47.28 %). The hospital admissions due to ADRs were 57 (23.84 %). Antibiotics were the most commonly associated drug class (52.30 %), followed by Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (11.29 %). Among individual drugs, ceftriaxone and phenytoin were the most common drugs involved in serious ADRs. Adults were the most affected, 185 (77.40 %) compared to other age groups. The skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, system organ class (SOC)155 (46.55 %) was highly affected, while erythematous and maculopapular rashes were the most common. Eleven Stevens-Johnson syndrome cases and three toxic epidermal necrolysis cases, like specific ADRs, were also obtained. The most ADRs were probable 121 (50.60 %) and possible 100 (41.84 %) category.

Conclusion

This study highlights the significant burden of serious ADRs within Central India, emphasising the need for heightened pharmacovigilance and targeted interventions, especially among adults. The prevalence of serious ADRs in females and adults and the impact on hospitalisations emphasise the need for cautious drug use, especially in inpatient settings. Limited understanding and reporting exist regarding the profile of serious ADRs in resource-limited countries. The findings will contribute to developing strategies for shaping future policies to promote the safer use of medicines. The under-reporting of ADRs in our setting and low-income countries is also a concern. Therefore, it is imperative to raise awareness about ADR reporting by healthcare professionals as well as patients to promote the safe utilisation of drugs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信