A randomized controlled trial of beta-blockers effects on cardiac anxiety

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Philip Leissner , Katarina Mars , Sophia Humphries , Tomas Jernberg , Claes Held , Robin Hofmann , Erik M.G. Olsson
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial of beta-blockers effects on cardiac anxiety","authors":"Philip Leissner ,&nbsp;Katarina Mars ,&nbsp;Sophia Humphries ,&nbsp;Tomas Jernberg ,&nbsp;Claes Held ,&nbsp;Robin Hofmann ,&nbsp;Erik M.G. Olsson","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Cardiac anxiety (CA) is common and has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). While beta-blockers are widely used in secondary prevention after AMI and have proven anxiolytic effects among psychiatric patients, little is known of their effect on CA among AMI-patients. This study aimed to investigate the effect of beta-blockers on CA in post-AMI patients with preserved cardiac function.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this parallel-group, open-label, registry-based randomized clinical trial, assessments with the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) were obtained at hospitalization and at two follow-up points (6–10 weeks and 12–14 months) after AMI. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle using multiple linear regression, calculating both short- and long-term effects. Stratified analyses were also conducted in groups with low, moderate and high baseline values on the CAQ.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From August 2018 through June 2022, 806 patients were enrolled. In the main analysis, no treatment effect of beta-blocker on CA was observed at either follow-up. In stratified analyses, the levels of CA symptoms were lower for those randomized to beta-blocker treatment in the group with moderate baseline CA, at follow-up 2 (β = −0.12; 95 % CI -0.22, −0.02; <em>P</em> = 0.016).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This trial found no evidence of an effect of beta-blockers on CA among AMI-patients with preserved cardiac function. However, lacking information on beta-blocker adherence limits the possibility of drawing firm conclusions. Furthermore, there might be a differential effect among patients depending on their baseline CA level, as patients with moderate baseline CA randomized to beta-blockers reported lower CA during follow-up than controls.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"94 ","pages":"Pages 26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325000404","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Cardiac anxiety (CA) is common and has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). While beta-blockers are widely used in secondary prevention after AMI and have proven anxiolytic effects among psychiatric patients, little is known of their effect on CA among AMI-patients. This study aimed to investigate the effect of beta-blockers on CA in post-AMI patients with preserved cardiac function.

Methods

In this parallel-group, open-label, registry-based randomized clinical trial, assessments with the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) were obtained at hospitalization and at two follow-up points (6–10 weeks and 12–14 months) after AMI. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle using multiple linear regression, calculating both short- and long-term effects. Stratified analyses were also conducted in groups with low, moderate and high baseline values on the CAQ.

Results

From August 2018 through June 2022, 806 patients were enrolled. In the main analysis, no treatment effect of beta-blocker on CA was observed at either follow-up. In stratified analyses, the levels of CA symptoms were lower for those randomized to beta-blocker treatment in the group with moderate baseline CA, at follow-up 2 (β = −0.12; 95 % CI -0.22, −0.02; P = 0.016).

Conclusions

This trial found no evidence of an effect of beta-blockers on CA among AMI-patients with preserved cardiac function. However, lacking information on beta-blocker adherence limits the possibility of drawing firm conclusions. Furthermore, there might be a differential effect among patients depending on their baseline CA level, as patients with moderate baseline CA randomized to beta-blockers reported lower CA during follow-up than controls.

Abstract Image

目的:心脏焦虑症(CA)很常见,与急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者发病率和死亡率的增加有关。虽然β-受体阻滞剂被广泛用于急性心肌梗死后的二级预防,并已证明对精神病患者有抗焦虑作用,但人们对其对急性心肌梗死患者的焦虑症的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨β-受体阻滞剂对心功能保存完好的急性心肌梗死后患者的CA的影响。方法在这项平行组、开放标签、基于登记的随机临床试验中,使用心脏焦虑问卷(CAQ)在急性心肌梗死后住院时和两个随访点(6-10周和12-14个月)进行评估。分析基于意向治疗(ITT)原则,使用多元线性回归计算短期和长期效果。还对CAQ基线值低、中、高的组别进行了分层分析。结果从2018年8月到2022年6月,共有806名患者入组。在主要分析中,两次随访均未观察到β-受体阻滞剂对CA的治疗效果。在分层分析中,随机接受β-受体阻滞剂治疗的中度基线CA组患者在随访2时的CA症状水平较低(β = -0.12; 95 % CI -0.22, -0.02;P = 0.016).结论这项试验没有发现β-受体阻滞剂对心功能保留的AMI患者的CA有影响的证据。然而,由于缺乏有关β-受体阻滞剂依从性的信息,因此无法得出确切的结论。此外,基线CA水平不同的患者可能会产生不同的影响,因为随机使用β-受体阻滞剂的中度基线CA患者在随访期间的CA水平低于对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信