Cancer risk due to ingestion of naturally occurring radionuclides through drinking water: A systematic review

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wafa Alimam , Anssi Auvinen
{"title":"Cancer risk due to ingestion of naturally occurring radionuclides through drinking water: A systematic review","authors":"Wafa Alimam ,&nbsp;Anssi Auvinen","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Naturally occurring radionuclides can, in rare cases, reach high levels in drinking water of specific areas, leading to meaningful radiation exposures upon ingestion. Increased cancer risk is the only well-established health impact of exposure to low-dose radiation. Multiple ecological studies have shown conflicting results about cancer risk in areas of high levels of radionuclides in water. However, such studies have methodological limitations and are generally not highly informative. Studies with individual-level data are scarce and have not established a clear association either. To further investigate this issue, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on cancer risk associated with radionuclide ingestion through drinking water, aiming to summarize and evaluate the current epidemiological evidence. Published studies have examined the effects of uranium, radium, and radon, while potential risks of polonium, radioactive lead, and thorium remain unknown. Existing research is heterogeneous regarding the cancer types assessed and faces methodological challenges, including limitations in exposure assessment, dosimetric uncertainties, low statistical power, and inadequate control of confounding factors. Due to lack of high-quality evidence, it is not possible to confirm or rule out an increased cancer risk among highly exposed populations. While risk assessment based on extrapolation from high dose studies does not suggest an excess cancer risk beyond background variation, such assessment involves considerable uncertainties. Future studies should focus on populations with high radionuclide exposure to provide sufficient exposure contrast, prioritizing radionuclides with high-dose coefficients and cancers in tissues with the highest radionuclide deposition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"968 ","pages":"Article 178849"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972500484X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Naturally occurring radionuclides can, in rare cases, reach high levels in drinking water of specific areas, leading to meaningful radiation exposures upon ingestion. Increased cancer risk is the only well-established health impact of exposure to low-dose radiation. Multiple ecological studies have shown conflicting results about cancer risk in areas of high levels of radionuclides in water. However, such studies have methodological limitations and are generally not highly informative. Studies with individual-level data are scarce and have not established a clear association either. To further investigate this issue, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on cancer risk associated with radionuclide ingestion through drinking water, aiming to summarize and evaluate the current epidemiological evidence. Published studies have examined the effects of uranium, radium, and radon, while potential risks of polonium, radioactive lead, and thorium remain unknown. Existing research is heterogeneous regarding the cancer types assessed and faces methodological challenges, including limitations in exposure assessment, dosimetric uncertainties, low statistical power, and inadequate control of confounding factors. Due to lack of high-quality evidence, it is not possible to confirm or rule out an increased cancer risk among highly exposed populations. While risk assessment based on extrapolation from high dose studies does not suggest an excess cancer risk beyond background variation, such assessment involves considerable uncertainties. Future studies should focus on populations with high radionuclide exposure to provide sufficient exposure contrast, prioritizing radionuclides with high-dose coefficients and cancers in tissues with the highest radionuclide deposition.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信