Evaluation of rock slope stability using field, laboratory, and numerical methods: A case study of critical road sections from Morka- Chencha, in Southern Ethiopia

IF 2.2 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Hayat Abdela , Bayisa Regassa , Tola Garo , Addisu Bekele
{"title":"Evaluation of rock slope stability using field, laboratory, and numerical methods: A case study of critical road sections from Morka- Chencha, in Southern Ethiopia","authors":"Hayat Abdela ,&nbsp;Bayisa Regassa ,&nbsp;Tola Garo ,&nbsp;Addisu Bekele","doi":"10.1016/j.qsa.2025.100273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Slope failure is one of the most common geo-environmental natural hazards on steep and mountainous terrain the worldwide resulting in human loss and damage to civil engineering infrastructure. In Southern Ethiopia the road connecting Morka Gircha, and Chencha passes through steep hillside mountains and deep valleys. As a part of this study, slope stability along selected road sections was determined and evaluated, and remedial solutions were provided on the basis of field investigations and numerical analysis. For this study, field research included discontinuity surveys, in situ rock testing, rock sampling for laboratory analysis, slope geometry, and orientation measurements. Field observations revealed that four crucial rock slope sections were selected for stability analysis assessment. Kinematic assessments via Dips software at slope sections RS2 and RS4 revealed the planar kinds of rock slope failure. Further stability analysis via the RocPlane program revealed that the crucial rock slope sections at RS2 are unstable under all anticipated conditions. However, the rock critical slope segment at RS4 remains stable under static dry, dynamic dry, and static saturated conditions and unstable under dynamic saturated conditions. Furthermore, a stability study was conducted via limit equilibrium and finite element methods for static dry, static saturated, dynamic dry, and dynamic saturated loading scenarios at crucial rock slope sections RS1 and RS5. This study's performance analysis of geometric profiles indicates that variations of slope height and slope angle lead to greater slope stability. This shows that the factor of safety values in both the LEM and FEM change as the slope angle and slope height decrease. Furthermore, the study reveals that the insertion of rock bolts at planar failure sites increases the FOS slope.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34142,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Science Advances","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Science Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666033425000097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Slope failure is one of the most common geo-environmental natural hazards on steep and mountainous terrain the worldwide resulting in human loss and damage to civil engineering infrastructure. In Southern Ethiopia the road connecting Morka Gircha, and Chencha passes through steep hillside mountains and deep valleys. As a part of this study, slope stability along selected road sections was determined and evaluated, and remedial solutions were provided on the basis of field investigations and numerical analysis. For this study, field research included discontinuity surveys, in situ rock testing, rock sampling for laboratory analysis, slope geometry, and orientation measurements. Field observations revealed that four crucial rock slope sections were selected for stability analysis assessment. Kinematic assessments via Dips software at slope sections RS2 and RS4 revealed the planar kinds of rock slope failure. Further stability analysis via the RocPlane program revealed that the crucial rock slope sections at RS2 are unstable under all anticipated conditions. However, the rock critical slope segment at RS4 remains stable under static dry, dynamic dry, and static saturated conditions and unstable under dynamic saturated conditions. Furthermore, a stability study was conducted via limit equilibrium and finite element methods for static dry, static saturated, dynamic dry, and dynamic saturated loading scenarios at crucial rock slope sections RS1 and RS5. This study's performance analysis of geometric profiles indicates that variations of slope height and slope angle lead to greater slope stability. This shows that the factor of safety values in both the LEM and FEM change as the slope angle and slope height decrease. Furthermore, the study reveals that the insertion of rock bolts at planar failure sites increases the FOS slope.
使用现场、实验室和数值方法评价岩质边坡稳定性:以埃塞俄比亚南部Morka- Chencha关键路段为例
边坡破坏是世界范围内最常见的地质环境自然灾害之一,它不仅给人类造成了巨大的损失,而且给土木工程基础设施造成了严重的破坏。在埃塞俄比亚南部,连接Morka Gircha和Chencha的公路穿过陡峭的山坡山脉和深谷。作为本研究的一部分,对选定路段的边坡稳定性进行了确定和评价,并在现场调查和数值分析的基础上提出了修复方案。在这项研究中,现场研究包括不连续面调查、原位岩石测试、实验室分析岩石取样、边坡几何形状和方向测量。现场观测结果表明,选取了4个关键岩质边坡断面进行稳定性分析评价。利用dip软件对RS2和RS4段进行运动学评价,揭示了岩石边坡的平面破坏类型。通过RocPlane程序进行的进一步稳定性分析表明,在所有预期条件下,RS2的关键岩质边坡截面都是不稳定的。而RS4岩质临界边坡段在静干、动干、静饱和条件下均保持稳定,在动饱和条件下不稳定。通过极限平衡法和有限元法对关键岩质边坡RS1和RS5段静干、静饱和、动干和动饱和荷载情况进行了稳定性研究。本研究对几何剖面的性能分析表明,坡高和坡角的变化对边坡稳定性有较大影响。这表明LEM和FEM的安全系数随坡角和坡高的减小而变化。此外,研究表明,锚杆在平面破坏部位的插入增加了FOS边坡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quaternary Science Advances
Quaternary Science Advances Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信