Tracer distribution in legume roots and soluble rhizodeposits over a few weeks after a triple isotope (13C, 15N, 33P) labeling

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Pierre Stevenel, Samuel Abiven, Emmanuel Frossard, Idupulapati M. Rao, Federica Tamburini, Astrid Oberson
{"title":"Tracer distribution in legume roots and soluble rhizodeposits over a few weeks after a triple isotope (13C, 15N, 33P) labeling","authors":"Pierre Stevenel, Samuel Abiven, Emmanuel Frossard, Idupulapati M. Rao, Federica Tamburini, Astrid Oberson","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07205-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Belowground carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) inputs by plants via roots and rhizodeposition are key drivers of these elements cycling in soils. Tracing and quantification of rhizodeposition using isotope enrichment techniques is based on assumptions that have not simultaneously been tested for C, N and P. Our objectives were: (i) to compare the elemental and isotopic composition (IC) of roots and soluble rhizodeposits for C, N and P; and (ii) to compare the IC of root segments of different ages to assess the homogeneity of root system labeling.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The legume <i>Canavalia brasiliensis</i> was grown in sand and labeled with <sup>13</sup>C, <sup>15</sup>N and <sup>33</sup>P by using a novel tri-isotope method in two different experiments lasting two (percolate collection) and three weeks (root observation) after labeling.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Soluble rhizodeposits were less isotope enriched than roots at each time point, and each element showed a different course over time. The <sup>13</sup>C:<sup>15</sup>N and <sup>13</sup>C:<sup>33</sup>P ratios of rhizodeposits were higher shortly after labeling than at later samplings, highlighting faster transfer of <sup>13</sup>C than <sup>15</sup>N and <sup>33</sup>P into rhizodeposits. Phosphorus fertilizer increased the difference between IC of P in roots and rhizodeposits. Youngest root segments were more isotopically enriched than older segments, again with element specific time course, showing that root segments of different ages differ in IC.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Assumptions underlying the quantification of rhizodeposition are not met. Temporal and spatial differences in IC of roots and soluble rhizodeposits are element specific, which needs to be considered in stoichiometric studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"80 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07205-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Belowground carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) inputs by plants via roots and rhizodeposition are key drivers of these elements cycling in soils. Tracing and quantification of rhizodeposition using isotope enrichment techniques is based on assumptions that have not simultaneously been tested for C, N and P. Our objectives were: (i) to compare the elemental and isotopic composition (IC) of roots and soluble rhizodeposits for C, N and P; and (ii) to compare the IC of root segments of different ages to assess the homogeneity of root system labeling.

Methods

The legume Canavalia brasiliensis was grown in sand and labeled with 13C, 15N and 33P by using a novel tri-isotope method in two different experiments lasting two (percolate collection) and three weeks (root observation) after labeling.

Results

Soluble rhizodeposits were less isotope enriched than roots at each time point, and each element showed a different course over time. The 13C:15N and 13C:33P ratios of rhizodeposits were higher shortly after labeling than at later samplings, highlighting faster transfer of 13C than 15N and 33P into rhizodeposits. Phosphorus fertilizer increased the difference between IC of P in roots and rhizodeposits. Youngest root segments were more isotopically enriched than older segments, again with element specific time course, showing that root segments of different ages differ in IC.

Conclusion

Assumptions underlying the quantification of rhizodeposition are not met. Temporal and spatial differences in IC of roots and soluble rhizodeposits are element specific, which needs to be considered in stoichiometric studies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信