The multidisciplinary team reduces the time to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis diagnosis in a real-life setting.

Minerva medica Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09643-0
Tiziana La Blasca, Alida Benfante, Riccardo Messina, Emanuele Grassedonio, Salvatore Battaglia, Giada Capizzi, Irene Di Leo, Laura Napoli, Sergio Palma, Pietro Provinzano, Alessandra Tomasello, Nicola Scichilone
{"title":"The multidisciplinary team reduces the time to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis diagnosis in a real-life setting.","authors":"Tiziana La Blasca, Alida Benfante, Riccardo Messina, Emanuele Grassedonio, Salvatore Battaglia, Giada Capizzi, Irene Di Leo, Laura Napoli, Sergio Palma, Pietro Provinzano, Alessandra Tomasello, Nicola Scichilone","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09643-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is fundamental to slow disease progression; multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) play a central role in posing the final diagnosis of IPF, thus aiming to improve patient outcomes. However, the practical implementation of MDTs in clinical real-life settings may be hindered by the lack of local expertise or time constraints, with the diagnosis being made without the support of complementary professional health care figures. This study aims to evaluate the impact of MDT meetings on the latency between the symptom onset and the final diagnosis of IPF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients referred to a regional center for IPF between January 2019 and August 2019 were included. The length of time to pose a definite diagnosis by means of MDT evaluation was compared with that of patients diagnosed elsewhere (no MDT evaluation) in an observational case-control investigation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 24 IPF patients, those evaluated by MDT (M/F: 14/2, age: 69.8±8.2 yrs) showed a time interval from the first outpatient visit to the definite diagnosis of 3±2.3 months; on the other hand, patients in the control group (M/F: 7/1, age: 76.9±7.7 yrs) showed a time interval of 12.8±9.4 months (P=0.02). The time elapsed between the onset of symptoms and the definite diagnosis was 11.1±5.3 months for patients evaluated within the MDT, compared to 33.8±21.5 months for the control group (P=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These exploratory findings confirm the essential role of the MDT in the early diagnosis of IPF, thus discouraging the acquisition of diagnosis solely on individual basis. The current findings highlight the need for the implementation of MDTs in clinical practice to optimize patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94143,"journal":{"name":"Minerva medica","volume":" ","pages":"101-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09643-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is fundamental to slow disease progression; multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) play a central role in posing the final diagnosis of IPF, thus aiming to improve patient outcomes. However, the practical implementation of MDTs in clinical real-life settings may be hindered by the lack of local expertise or time constraints, with the diagnosis being made without the support of complementary professional health care figures. This study aims to evaluate the impact of MDT meetings on the latency between the symptom onset and the final diagnosis of IPF.

Methods: Patients referred to a regional center for IPF between January 2019 and August 2019 were included. The length of time to pose a definite diagnosis by means of MDT evaluation was compared with that of patients diagnosed elsewhere (no MDT evaluation) in an observational case-control investigation.

Results: Among 24 IPF patients, those evaluated by MDT (M/F: 14/2, age: 69.8±8.2 yrs) showed a time interval from the first outpatient visit to the definite diagnosis of 3±2.3 months; on the other hand, patients in the control group (M/F: 7/1, age: 76.9±7.7 yrs) showed a time interval of 12.8±9.4 months (P=0.02). The time elapsed between the onset of symptoms and the definite diagnosis was 11.1±5.3 months for patients evaluated within the MDT, compared to 33.8±21.5 months for the control group (P=0.02).

Conclusions: These exploratory findings confirm the essential role of the MDT in the early diagnosis of IPF, thus discouraging the acquisition of diagnosis solely on individual basis. The current findings highlight the need for the implementation of MDTs in clinical practice to optimize patient care.

多学科团队减少了在现实生活中诊断特发性肺纤维化的时间。
背景:特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的早期诊断是减缓疾病进展的基础;多学科团队(MDTs)在提出IPF的最终诊断中发挥核心作用,从而旨在改善患者的预后。然而,由于缺乏当地专业知识或时间限制,在临床现实环境中实际实施mdt可能会受到阻碍,因为做出诊断时没有补充性的专业卫生保健人员的支持。本研究旨在评估MDT会议对IPF症状出现和最终诊断之间的潜伏期的影响。方法:纳入2019年1月至2019年8月间转介至IPF区域中心的患者。在一项观察性病例对照调查中,通过MDT评估提出明确诊断的时间长度与在其他地方诊断的患者(未进行MDT评估)的时间长度进行比较。结果:在24例IPF患者中,经MDT评估的患者(M/F: 14/2,年龄:69.8±8.2岁)从首次门诊就诊到确诊时间间隔为3±2.3个月;而对照组患者(M/F: 7/1,年龄:76.9±7.7岁)的时间间隔为12.8±9.4个月(P=0.02)。在MDT内评估的患者,从症状出现到明确诊断的时间为11.1±5.3个月,而对照组为33.8±21.5个月(P=0.02)。结论:这些探索性发现证实了MDT在IPF早期诊断中的重要作用,因此不鼓励仅根据个体进行诊断。目前的研究结果强调了在临床实践中实施mdt以优化患者护理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信