Potentially modifiable ventilation factors associated with outcome in neurocritical care vs. non-neurocritical care patients: Rational and protocol for a patient-level analysis of PRoVENT, PRoVENT-iMiC and ENIO (PRIME)

S.C. Serafini , R. Cinotti , K. Asehnoune , D. Battaglini , C. Robba , A.S. Neto , L. Pisani , G. Mazzinari , E.M. Tschernko , M.J. Schultz , on behalf of the PRoVENT, the PRoVENT–iMiC and ENIO, investigators
{"title":"Potentially modifiable ventilation factors associated with outcome in neurocritical care vs. non-neurocritical care patients: Rational and protocol for a patient-level analysis of PRoVENT, PRoVENT-iMiC and ENIO (PRIME)","authors":"S.C. Serafini ,&nbsp;R. Cinotti ,&nbsp;K. Asehnoune ,&nbsp;D. Battaglini ,&nbsp;C. Robba ,&nbsp;A.S. Neto ,&nbsp;L. Pisani ,&nbsp;G. Mazzinari ,&nbsp;E.M. Tschernko ,&nbsp;M.J. Schultz ,&nbsp;on behalf of the PRoVENT, the PRoVENT–iMiC and ENIO, investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2025.501690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ventilator settings and ventilation variables and parameters vary between neurocritical care and non-neurocritical care patients. We aim to compare ventilation management in neurocritical care patients versus non–neurocritical care patients under invasive mechanical ventilation support, and to determine which factors related to ventilatory management have an independent association with outcome in neurocritical patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and analysis</h3><div>We meta-analyze harmonized individual patient data from three observational studies (‘PRactice of VENTilation in critically ill patients without ARDS’ [PRoVENT], ‘PRactice of VENTilation in critically ill patients in Middle–income Countries’ [PRoVENT–iMiC] and ‘Extubation strategies and in neuro–intensive care unit patients and associations with outcomes’ [ENIO]), pooled into a database named ‘PRIME’. The primary endpoint is all cause ICU mortality. Secondary endpoints are key ventilator settings and ventilation variables and parameters. To identify potentially modifiable and non–modifiable factors contributing to ICU mortality, a multivariable model will be built using demographic factors, comorbidities, illness severities, and respiratory and laboratorial variables. In analyses examining the impact of ventilatory variables on outcome, we will estimate the relative risk of ICU mortality for neurocritical and non-neurocritical care patients by dividing the study population based on key ventilator variables and parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Ethics and dissemination</h3><div>This meta-analysis will address a clinically significant research question by comparing neurocritical care with non–neurocritical care patients. As this is a meta-analysis, additional ethical committee approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated to the scientific community through abstracts and original articles in peer–reviewed journals. Furthermore, the PRIME database will be made accessible for further post–hoc analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>PROVENT, PROVENT–iMiC and ENIO, and the pooled database PRIME are registered at clinicaltrials.gov (<span><span>NCT01868321</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> for PRoVENT, <span><span>NCT03188770</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> for PRoVENT–iMiC, and <span><span>NCT03400904</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> for ENIO, and for PRIME is pending).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":"72 5","pages":"Article 501690"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341192925000800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Ventilator settings and ventilation variables and parameters vary between neurocritical care and non-neurocritical care patients. We aim to compare ventilation management in neurocritical care patients versus non–neurocritical care patients under invasive mechanical ventilation support, and to determine which factors related to ventilatory management have an independent association with outcome in neurocritical patients.

Methods and analysis

We meta-analyze harmonized individual patient data from three observational studies (‘PRactice of VENTilation in critically ill patients without ARDS’ [PRoVENT], ‘PRactice of VENTilation in critically ill patients in Middle–income Countries’ [PRoVENT–iMiC] and ‘Extubation strategies and in neuro–intensive care unit patients and associations with outcomes’ [ENIO]), pooled into a database named ‘PRIME’. The primary endpoint is all cause ICU mortality. Secondary endpoints are key ventilator settings and ventilation variables and parameters. To identify potentially modifiable and non–modifiable factors contributing to ICU mortality, a multivariable model will be built using demographic factors, comorbidities, illness severities, and respiratory and laboratorial variables. In analyses examining the impact of ventilatory variables on outcome, we will estimate the relative risk of ICU mortality for neurocritical and non-neurocritical care patients by dividing the study population based on key ventilator variables and parameters.

Ethics and dissemination

This meta-analysis will address a clinically significant research question by comparing neurocritical care with non–neurocritical care patients. As this is a meta-analysis, additional ethical committee approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated to the scientific community through abstracts and original articles in peer–reviewed journals. Furthermore, the PRIME database will be made accessible for further post–hoc analyses.

Registration

PROVENT, PROVENT–iMiC and ENIO, and the pooled database PRIME are registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01868321 for PRoVENT, NCT03188770 for PRoVENT–iMiC, and NCT03400904 for ENIO, and for PRIME is pending).
与神经重症患者和非神经重症患者预后相关的潜在可改变通气因素:对 PRoVENT、PRoVENT-iMiC 和 ENIO(PRIME)进行患者层面分析的理由和方案。
简介:呼吸机设置和通气变量和参数在神经危重症和非神经危重症患者之间有所不同。我们的目的是比较神经危重症患者与非神经危重症患者在有创机械通气支持下的通气管理,并确定哪些与通气管理相关的因素与神经危重症患者的预后有独立的关联。方法和分析:我们荟萃分析了来自三个观察性研究(“无ARDS的危重患者的通气实践”[PRoVENT],“中等收入国家危重患者的通气实践”[PRoVENT- imic]和“拔管策略和神经重症监护病房患者及其与结果的关联”[ENIO])的个体患者数据,汇集到一个名为“PRIME”的数据库中。主要终点是ICU的全因死亡率。次要终点是关键的通风机设置和通风变量和参数。为了确定可能导致ICU死亡率的可改变和不可改变的因素,将使用人口统计学因素、合并症、疾病严重程度、呼吸和实验室变量建立多变量模型。在分析检查呼吸机变量对结果的影响时,我们将根据关键呼吸机变量和参数划分研究人群,估计神经危重症和非神经危重症护理患者在ICU死亡的相对风险。伦理和传播:本荟萃分析将通过比较神经危重症和非神经危重症患者来解决一个具有临床意义的研究问题。由于这是一项荟萃分析,因此不需要额外的伦理委员会批准。研究结果将通过摘要和同行评议期刊上的原创文章传播给科学界。此外,PRIME数据库将供进一步的事后分析使用。注册:PROVENT, PROVENT- imic和ENIO以及汇集数据库PRIME在clinicaltrials.gov上注册(PROVENT为NCT01868321, PROVENT- imic为NCT03188770, ENIO为NCT03400904, PRIME正在等待中)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信