Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With MRI Department Services and Staff in Saudi Hospitals.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S503803
Sami A Alghamdi
{"title":"Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With MRI Department Services and Staff in Saudi Hospitals.","authors":"Sami A Alghamdi","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S503803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient satisfaction is a key component of healthcare quality and is essential for improving clinical outcomes. This study was conducted to assess patient satisfaction with MRI services across 10 hospitals in Saudi Arabia, focusing on both department services and staff performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted from July to August 2024 and involved 496 patients at four private and six public hospitals who underwent MRI scans. A structured questionnaire comprising a five-point Likert scale was used to measure patient satisfaction with MRI department services and staff. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's chi-square test, t-tests, and ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of respondents (51.6% female) were 40-49 years of age, and 41.1% held a bachelor's degree. Overall, 92% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with MRI department services, particularly with registration efficiency (91.9%) and equipment quality (84.7%). However, satisfaction with waiting times was lower, with 66.1% of patients expressing satisfaction. Regarding MRI staff, 95.9% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with the privacy and confidentiality maintained during the procedure. A strong positive correlation (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) was observed between satisfaction with staff and overall MRI services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The patients reported high levels of satisfaction with MRI services, particularly with staff professionalism and facility quality. However, waiting times before MRI scans were identified as requiring improvement, particularly in public hospitals. Addressing this issue while maintaining high service standards can enhance patient satisfaction and overall experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"419-428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S503803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction is a key component of healthcare quality and is essential for improving clinical outcomes. This study was conducted to assess patient satisfaction with MRI services across 10 hospitals in Saudi Arabia, focusing on both department services and staff performance.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from July to August 2024 and involved 496 patients at four private and six public hospitals who underwent MRI scans. A structured questionnaire comprising a five-point Likert scale was used to measure patient satisfaction with MRI department services and staff. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's chi-square test, t-tests, and ANOVA.

Results: The majority of respondents (51.6% female) were 40-49 years of age, and 41.1% held a bachelor's degree. Overall, 92% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with MRI department services, particularly with registration efficiency (91.9%) and equipment quality (84.7%). However, satisfaction with waiting times was lower, with 66.1% of patients expressing satisfaction. Regarding MRI staff, 95.9% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with the privacy and confidentiality maintained during the procedure. A strong positive correlation (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) was observed between satisfaction with staff and overall MRI services.

Conclusion: The patients reported high levels of satisfaction with MRI services, particularly with staff professionalism and facility quality. However, waiting times before MRI scans were identified as requiring improvement, particularly in public hospitals. Addressing this issue while maintaining high service standards can enhance patient satisfaction and overall experience.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信