Electroencephalogram Electrode and Amplifier Temperature Changes During Routine Anatomical and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences at 3 Tesla.

Adam J Stark, Caleb J Han, Jarrod J Eisma, Alexander K Song, Maria E Garza, Leah G Mann, Daniel O Claassen, Manus J Donahue
{"title":"Electroencephalogram Electrode and Amplifier Temperature Changes During Routine Anatomical and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences at 3 Tesla.","authors":"Adam J Stark, Caleb J Han, Jarrod J Eisma, Alexander K Song, Maria E Garza, Leah G Mann, Daniel O Claassen, Manus J Donahue","doi":"10.1177/15500594251320294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences commonly used in simultaneous electroencephalogram (EEG)-MRI studies include blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) and anatomical T<sub>1</sub>-weighted MRI. Safety and electrode heating profiles for these sequences have been well-characterized. However, recent improvements in EEG design may allow for additional sequences to be performed with similar expectations of heating safety, which would expand the EEG-MRI infrastructure for quantitative physiological studies. We evaluated temperature changes ex vivo and in vivo over a wider range of preparation and readout modules with differing specific absorption rate (SAR). A 32-channel EEG cap was used at 3 T and ex vivo heating was assessed for 2D- and 3D-pseudo-continuous-arterial-spin-labeling, 2D-cine, 2D-phase-contrast, 2D T<sub>2</sub>-Relaxation-Under-Spin-Tagging, 32-direction <i>b </i>= 1000 s/mm<sup>2</sup> and <i>b </i>= 2000 s/mm<sup>2</sup> 2D-diffusion tensor imaging, multiband-BOLD, 3D-T1 MPRAGE, 3D-FLAIR, and 3D-T2. Temperature was monitored with a fiberoptic probe system and plotted over six different electrodes, the amplifier, and battery pack. In vivo assessments were conducted in three participants with the same system. A further in vivo supplemental cohort (n = 10) was used to further evaluate qualitative self-reported heating. Device integrity was evaluated by the manufacturer following experiments. Peak temperature and maximum temperature increases were 23.0°C and 0.4°C respectively ex vivo, and 37.6°C and 0.7°C respectively in vivo. Temperatures did not approach the safety heating threshold of 40°C (defined as a conservative threshold based on manufacturer recommendations and burn injury data). Participants completed in vivo scans without adverse events. No manufacturer-reported device damage was identified. Overall, the tested scans induced heating below critical limits at the clinical field strength of 3 T.</p>","PeriodicalId":93940,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"15500594251320294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594251320294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences commonly used in simultaneous electroencephalogram (EEG)-MRI studies include blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) and anatomical T1-weighted MRI. Safety and electrode heating profiles for these sequences have been well-characterized. However, recent improvements in EEG design may allow for additional sequences to be performed with similar expectations of heating safety, which would expand the EEG-MRI infrastructure for quantitative physiological studies. We evaluated temperature changes ex vivo and in vivo over a wider range of preparation and readout modules with differing specific absorption rate (SAR). A 32-channel EEG cap was used at 3 T and ex vivo heating was assessed for 2D- and 3D-pseudo-continuous-arterial-spin-labeling, 2D-cine, 2D-phase-contrast, 2D T2-Relaxation-Under-Spin-Tagging, 32-direction b = 1000 s/mm2 and b = 2000 s/mm2 2D-diffusion tensor imaging, multiband-BOLD, 3D-T1 MPRAGE, 3D-FLAIR, and 3D-T2. Temperature was monitored with a fiberoptic probe system and plotted over six different electrodes, the amplifier, and battery pack. In vivo assessments were conducted in three participants with the same system. A further in vivo supplemental cohort (n = 10) was used to further evaluate qualitative self-reported heating. Device integrity was evaluated by the manufacturer following experiments. Peak temperature and maximum temperature increases were 23.0°C and 0.4°C respectively ex vivo, and 37.6°C and 0.7°C respectively in vivo. Temperatures did not approach the safety heating threshold of 40°C (defined as a conservative threshold based on manufacturer recommendations and burn injury data). Participants completed in vivo scans without adverse events. No manufacturer-reported device damage was identified. Overall, the tested scans induced heating below critical limits at the clinical field strength of 3 T.

常规解剖和功能磁共振成像序列在3特斯拉下的脑电图电极和放大器温度变化。
磁共振成像(MRI)序列通常用于同时进行脑电图(EEG)-MRI研究,包括血氧水平依赖(BOLD)和解剖t1加权MRI。这些序列的安全性和电极加热曲线已经得到了很好的表征。然而,最近脑电图设计的改进可能允许在类似的加热安全预期下进行额外的序列,这将扩大脑电图- mri定量生理研究的基础设施。我们评估了体外和体内温度变化在更大范围内的制备和读出模块具有不同的特定吸收率(SAR)。在3t时使用32通道脑电图帽,体外加热评估2D和3d -伪连续动脉旋转标记,2D-cine, 2D相衬,2D t2 -松弛-旋转下标记,32方向b = 1000 s/mm2和b = 2000 s/mm2 2D弥散张量成像,多波段bold, 3D-T1 MPRAGE, 3D-FLAIR和3D-T2。使用光纤探头系统监测温度,并在六个不同的电极、放大器和电池组上绘制温度图。使用相同的系统对三名参与者进行体内评估。另一个体内补充队列(n = 10)用于进一步评估定性自我报告的加热。设备的完整性由制造商在实验后进行评估。离体峰值温度和最高温度分别升高23.0℃和0.4℃,体内峰值温度和最高温度分别升高37.6℃和0.7℃。温度没有接近40°C的安全加热阈值(根据制造商建议和烧伤数据定义为保守阈值)。参与者完成了体内扫描,没有出现不良事件。没有发现制造商报告的设备损坏。总的来说,在临床场强为3t时,测试扫描引起的加热低于临界极限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信