Impact of Anesthesia on Electroconvulsive Therapy-Related Impairments in Global Cognitive Function in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Léo Bernardoff, Martin Blay, Dimitri Thellier, Thierry D'Amato, Filipe Galvao, Emmanuel Poulet
{"title":"Impact of Anesthesia on Electroconvulsive Therapy-Related Impairments in Global Cognitive Function in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.","authors":"Léo Bernardoff, Martin Blay, Dimitri Thellier, Thierry D'Amato, Filipe Galvao, Emmanuel Poulet","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in patients with treatment-resistant depression frequently leads to impairments in global cognitive function. Propofol and etomidate are the 2 most frequently used drugs for anesthetic induction during ECT. However, only few studies compared their differential impact on ECT-related impairments in global cognitive function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied retrospectively 75 patients hospitalized at Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (Bron, France) who met the DSM-V criteria for major depressive disorder and were treated with bilateral ECT to compare the effects of propofol and etomidate on ECT-related cognitive impairment. Global cognitive function was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and symptom severity was assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), both before and after treatment. The primary endpoint of the study was the change in MoCA score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no significant difference in MoCA score variation between the etomidate and propofol groups. There were also no significant differences in MADRS score variation, responder, remission rate or ECT parameters between the 2 groups (except duration of electroencephalogram crisis).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective study, choice of etomidate or propofol as anesthetic agent had no impact on the adverse effects associated with ECT on global cognitive function in patients with treatment-resistant depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in patients with treatment-resistant depression frequently leads to impairments in global cognitive function. Propofol and etomidate are the 2 most frequently used drugs for anesthetic induction during ECT. However, only few studies compared their differential impact on ECT-related impairments in global cognitive function.

Methods: We studied retrospectively 75 patients hospitalized at Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (Bron, France) who met the DSM-V criteria for major depressive disorder and were treated with bilateral ECT to compare the effects of propofol and etomidate on ECT-related cognitive impairment. Global cognitive function was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and symptom severity was assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), both before and after treatment. The primary endpoint of the study was the change in MoCA score.

Results: We found no significant difference in MoCA score variation between the etomidate and propofol groups. There were also no significant differences in MADRS score variation, responder, remission rate or ECT parameters between the 2 groups (except duration of electroencephalogram crisis).

Conclusions: In this retrospective study, choice of etomidate or propofol as anesthetic agent had no impact on the adverse effects associated with ECT on global cognitive function in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信