Understanding Cybergrooming: A Systematic Review of Perpetrator Characteristics, Strategies, and Types.

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Maeve Moosburner, Christine Weber, Theresa Kuban, Sebastian Wachs, Alexander F Schmidt, Sonja Etzler, Martin Rettenberger
{"title":"Understanding Cybergrooming: A Systematic Review of Perpetrator Characteristics, Strategies, and Types.","authors":"Maeve Moosburner, Christine Weber, Theresa Kuban, Sebastian Wachs, Alexander F Schmidt, Sonja Etzler, Martin Rettenberger","doi":"10.1177/15248380251316223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aimed to synthesize findings on the characteristics of individuals with cybergrooming offense histories (ICOs), their grooming strategies, and emergent typologies. The Cochrane approach guided the review. Publications were included if they investigated adult ICOs older than 18 years of age, their characteristics, the strategies they utilized, existing typologies, and if they were empirical studies. Overall, 2,603 publications were retrieved from PubMed, PsycInfo, Psyndex, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar, using a string-guided electronic search. The quality of all 22 publications that met the inclusion criteria was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and the findings were synthesized. Results from 1,525 individuals across 22 studies revealed that ICOs tended to be male, around 30 years old, had few/no prior convictions, and were likely to have mental health problems. Strategies such as trying to build a real or feigned affectionate relationship via enticement, the introduction and pursuit of sexual content, and the assessment of the risk to be detected were common. Most studies differentiated between individuals who were primarily interested in an intimate relationship with the victim (the primarily intimacy-seeking) and those who were mainly interested in a quick satisfaction of their sexual needs (the primarily sexually preoccupied). Future research should focus on naturally occurring ICO/victim constellations and employ quantitative measures for adequate data collection. The findings underscore variety regarding strategies depending on ICOs' underlying factors, the state of the conversation with the victim, and their overall intention.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"15248380251316223"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251316223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to synthesize findings on the characteristics of individuals with cybergrooming offense histories (ICOs), their grooming strategies, and emergent typologies. The Cochrane approach guided the review. Publications were included if they investigated adult ICOs older than 18 years of age, their characteristics, the strategies they utilized, existing typologies, and if they were empirical studies. Overall, 2,603 publications were retrieved from PubMed, PsycInfo, Psyndex, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar, using a string-guided electronic search. The quality of all 22 publications that met the inclusion criteria was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and the findings were synthesized. Results from 1,525 individuals across 22 studies revealed that ICOs tended to be male, around 30 years old, had few/no prior convictions, and were likely to have mental health problems. Strategies such as trying to build a real or feigned affectionate relationship via enticement, the introduction and pursuit of sexual content, and the assessment of the risk to be detected were common. Most studies differentiated between individuals who were primarily interested in an intimate relationship with the victim (the primarily intimacy-seeking) and those who were mainly interested in a quick satisfaction of their sexual needs (the primarily sexually preoccupied). Future research should focus on naturally occurring ICO/victim constellations and employ quantitative measures for adequate data collection. The findings underscore variety regarding strategies depending on ICOs' underlying factors, the state of the conversation with the victim, and their overall intention.

理解网络修饰:对犯罪者特征、策略和类型的系统回顾。
本系统综述旨在综合具有网络修饰犯罪史(ICOs)的个体特征,其修饰策略和新兴类型的研究结果。Cochrane方法指导了综述。如果出版物调查了年龄大于18岁的成人ico,其特征,使用的策略,现有的类型学,并且如果它们是实证研究,则纳入出版物。总体而言,使用字符串引导电子搜索从PubMed, PsycInfo, Psyndex, Web of Science, ERIC和谷歌Scholar检索了2,603篇出版物。使用混合方法评估工具对所有符合纳入标准的22篇出版物的质量进行评估,并对结果进行综合。22项研究中1525人的结果显示,ico往往是30岁左右的男性,很少或没有前科,并且可能有精神健康问题。诸如试图通过引诱、介绍和追求性内容、评估被发现的风险等策略来建立一种真实或虚假的亲密关系是很常见的。大多数研究将主要对与受害者建立亲密关系感兴趣的人(主要是寻求亲密关系)和主要对快速满足性需求感兴趣的人(主要是性专注)区分开来。未来的研究应侧重于自然发生的ICO/受害者星座,并采用定量措施进行充分的数据收集。调查结果强调了根据ico的潜在因素、与受害者的对话状态以及他们的总体意图,策略的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信