A Multi-Stakeholder Qualitative Evaluation of ED PLUS: A Physiotherapy-Led Transition to Home Intervention for Older Adults Following Emergency Department Discharge.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S469933
Alison Holmes, Christine FitzGerald, Mairead Conneely, Margaret O'Connor, Katie Robinson, Aoife L Gallagher, Paul E Cotter, Rose Galvin
{"title":"A Multi-Stakeholder Qualitative Evaluation of ED PLUS: A Physiotherapy-Led Transition to Home Intervention for Older Adults Following Emergency Department Discharge.","authors":"Alison Holmes, Christine FitzGerald, Mairead Conneely, Margaret O'Connor, Katie Robinson, Aoife L Gallagher, Paul E Cotter, Rose Galvin","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S469933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older adults frequently attend Emergency Departments (EDs) and experience high rates of adverse outcomes, including functional decline, re-presentation, and unplanned hospital admissions. Developing effective interventions to prevent these outcomes is a priority. Healthcare providers (HCPs) are well positioned to create integrated care pathways for older adults discharged from the ED. ED PLUS is a physiotherapy-led, multidisciplinary model that bridges the care transition between the ED and the community. It initiates a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in the ED and provides multidisciplinary follow-up to the patient for six weeks post-discharge.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore the views and experiences of older adults and HCPs involved in the ED PLUS intervention to inform the design of a future definitive trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive qualitative design was used. Older adults (n = 9) and HCPs (n = 10) who participated in the intervention arm of the ED PLUS trial were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews exploring their experience and perspective of the ED PLUS intervention. These interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine older adults and six HCPs consented to participate. The evaluation highlighted stakeholders' experiences and suggested modifications for optimising ED PLUS. Four themes emerged: ED PLUS bridged the transition between care settings for older adults.Stakeholder collaboration and investment were key enablers of implementation.Organisational, logistical, and personnel issues impeded the intervention's delivery.There is potential for service optimisation and expansion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evaluation emphasises the important role of physiotherapists and other HCPs in transitional care delivery for older adults. The findings will inform future trials of the ED PLUS model, aiming to improve outcomes for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"20 ","pages":"147-159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S469933","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Older adults frequently attend Emergency Departments (EDs) and experience high rates of adverse outcomes, including functional decline, re-presentation, and unplanned hospital admissions. Developing effective interventions to prevent these outcomes is a priority. Healthcare providers (HCPs) are well positioned to create integrated care pathways for older adults discharged from the ED. ED PLUS is a physiotherapy-led, multidisciplinary model that bridges the care transition between the ED and the community. It initiates a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in the ED and provides multidisciplinary follow-up to the patient for six weeks post-discharge.

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the views and experiences of older adults and HCPs involved in the ED PLUS intervention to inform the design of a future definitive trial.

Methods: A descriptive qualitative design was used. Older adults (n = 9) and HCPs (n = 10) who participated in the intervention arm of the ED PLUS trial were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews exploring their experience and perspective of the ED PLUS intervention. These interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Nine older adults and six HCPs consented to participate. The evaluation highlighted stakeholders' experiences and suggested modifications for optimising ED PLUS. Four themes emerged: ED PLUS bridged the transition between care settings for older adults.Stakeholder collaboration and investment were key enablers of implementation.Organisational, logistical, and personnel issues impeded the intervention's delivery.There is potential for service optimisation and expansion.

Conclusion: This evaluation emphasises the important role of physiotherapists and other HCPs in transitional care delivery for older adults. The findings will inform future trials of the ED PLUS model, aiming to improve outcomes for this population.

ED PLUS的多利益相关者定性评价:急诊出院后老年人物理治疗主导的家庭干预过渡。
老年人经常去急诊科(EDs),并经历高发生率的不良后果,包括功能下降、再表现和计划外住院。制定有效的干预措施以预防这些后果是一个优先事项。医疗保健提供者(HCPs)很好地定位于为从急诊科出院的老年人创造综合护理途径。ED PLUS是一个以物理治疗为主导的多学科模式,在急诊科和社区之间架起了桥梁。它在急诊科启动了一项综合老年评估(CGA),并在出院后六周内为患者提供多学科随访。目的:本研究旨在探讨老年人和HCPs参与ED PLUS干预的观点和经验,为未来确定试验的设计提供信息。方法:采用描述性定性设计。参加ED PLUS试验干预组的老年人(n = 9)和HCPs (n = 10)被邀请参加半结构化访谈,探讨他们对ED PLUS干预的经验和观点。这些访谈被录音、转录,并使用反身性主题分析进行分析。结果:9名老年人和6名HCPs同意参与。评估强调了利益相关者的经验,并提出了优化ED PLUS的修改建议。出现了四个主题:ED PLUS在老年人护理环境之间架起了桥梁。利益相关者的合作和投资是实现的关键推动因素。组织、后勤和人员问题阻碍了干预措施的实施。有潜力进行服务优化和扩展。结论:该评估强调了物理治疗师和其他HCPs在老年人过渡护理中的重要作用。这些发现将为ED PLUS模型的未来试验提供信息,旨在改善这一人群的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信