Aging and the Division of Labor of Theory of Mind Skills in Metaphor Comprehension.

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Irene Ceccato, Serena Lecce, Luca Bischetti, Veronica Mangiaterra, Chiara Barattieri di San Pietro, Elena Cavallini, Valentina Bambini
{"title":"Aging and the Division of Labor of Theory of Mind Skills in Metaphor Comprehension.","authors":"Irene Ceccato, Serena Lecce, Luca Bischetti, Veronica Mangiaterra, Chiara Barattieri di San Pietro, Elena Cavallini, Valentina Bambini","doi":"10.1111/tops.12785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While some aspects of pragmatic competence are known to decline with age, for metaphor skills the evidence is inconclusive, possibly due to heterogeneity in the assessment tools. Furthermore, the previous literature on age-related changes in pragmatic skills has rarely considered the role of Theory of Mind (ToM), which is described as one of the main factors affecting metaphor across theoretical and experimental studies in children and clinical populations. This study aimed at elucidating age-related differences in metaphor understanding and the interplay between metaphor skills and ToM in middle-aged and older adults with a fine-grained approach. Participants (n = 201, age range 54-93) completed tasks assessing ToM and metaphor understanding. On the one side, we used the Physical and Mental Metaphors task, to distinguish between different types of metaphor (physical, such as \"Lifeguards are lizards,\" meaning that they lie in the sun, vs. mental, such as \"Adolescents are pendulums,\" meaning that they are emotionally unstable) and different aspects of metaphor understanding, namely, accuracy in finding a link between topic and vehicle versus type of interpretation (from physical to psychological). On the other side, we analyzed two aspects of ToM skills: the accuracy in mental state understanding and the intentionality, defined as the degree of mental state attribution, assessed with the Strange Stories and the Animated Social Triangles task, respectively. Structural equation models indicated a decline in metaphor skills with advancing age. Furthermore, we found that ToM is involved in metaphor understanding in a specific fashion. While higher ToM accuracy explained better metaphor accuracy, higher ToM intentionality explained better performance in the interpretation of mental, but not physical, metaphors. These findings suggest that age-related differences in pragmatics extend to metaphor skills and that ToM plays a role in metaphor comprehension in older age, with a division of labor where the ability to understand what others think is key to spotting a metaphorical link, but the greater tendency to attribute mental states is what specifically helps when it comes to grasping the psychological nuances of a metaphor.</p>","PeriodicalId":47822,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Cognitive Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12785","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While some aspects of pragmatic competence are known to decline with age, for metaphor skills the evidence is inconclusive, possibly due to heterogeneity in the assessment tools. Furthermore, the previous literature on age-related changes in pragmatic skills has rarely considered the role of Theory of Mind (ToM), which is described as one of the main factors affecting metaphor across theoretical and experimental studies in children and clinical populations. This study aimed at elucidating age-related differences in metaphor understanding and the interplay between metaphor skills and ToM in middle-aged and older adults with a fine-grained approach. Participants (n = 201, age range 54-93) completed tasks assessing ToM and metaphor understanding. On the one side, we used the Physical and Mental Metaphors task, to distinguish between different types of metaphor (physical, such as "Lifeguards are lizards," meaning that they lie in the sun, vs. mental, such as "Adolescents are pendulums," meaning that they are emotionally unstable) and different aspects of metaphor understanding, namely, accuracy in finding a link between topic and vehicle versus type of interpretation (from physical to psychological). On the other side, we analyzed two aspects of ToM skills: the accuracy in mental state understanding and the intentionality, defined as the degree of mental state attribution, assessed with the Strange Stories and the Animated Social Triangles task, respectively. Structural equation models indicated a decline in metaphor skills with advancing age. Furthermore, we found that ToM is involved in metaphor understanding in a specific fashion. While higher ToM accuracy explained better metaphor accuracy, higher ToM intentionality explained better performance in the interpretation of mental, but not physical, metaphors. These findings suggest that age-related differences in pragmatics extend to metaphor skills and that ToM plays a role in metaphor comprehension in older age, with a division of labor where the ability to understand what others think is key to spotting a metaphorical link, but the greater tendency to attribute mental states is what specifically helps when it comes to grasping the psychological nuances of a metaphor.

老龄化与隐喻理解中心理理论技能的分工。
虽然人们知道语用能力的某些方面会随着年龄的增长而下降,但对于隐喻技能,证据是不确定的,可能是由于评估工具的异质性。此外,以往关于语用技能年龄相关变化的文献很少考虑到心理理论(ToM)的作用,而心理理论在儿童和临床人群中被描述为影响隐喻的主要因素之一。本研究旨在通过细粒度方法,探讨中老年人隐喻理解的年龄差异以及隐喻技能与认知能力之间的相互作用。参与者(n = 201,年龄范围54-93)完成了评估ToM和隐喻理解的任务。一方面,我们使用生理和心理隐喻任务来区分不同类型的隐喻(生理隐喻,如“救生员是蜥蜴”,意思是他们躺在阳光下;心理隐喻,如“青少年是钟摆”,意思是他们情绪不稳定)和隐喻理解的不同方面,即找到主题和载体之间联系的准确性与解释类型(从生理到心理)。另一方面,我们分析了ToM技能的两个方面:心理状态理解的准确性和意向性,定义为心理状态归因的程度,分别用奇怪的故事和动画社会三角形任务来评估。结构方程模型显示隐喻技能随年龄增长而下降。此外,我们发现ToM以一种特定的方式参与隐喻理解。虽然更高的ToM准确性解释了更好的隐喻准确性,但更高的ToM意向性解释了更好的心理隐喻解释,而不是物理隐喻。这些发现表明,与年龄相关的语用学差异延伸到隐喻技能,而ToM在老年人的隐喻理解中发挥着作用,在劳动分工中,理解他人想法的能力是发现隐喻联系的关键,但更大的倾向是将心理状态归因,这在掌握隐喻的心理细微差别方面特别有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Cognitive Science
Topics in Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Topics in Cognitive Science (topiCS) is an innovative new journal that covers all areas of cognitive science including cognitive modeling, cognitive neuroscience, cognitive anthropology, and cognitive science and philosophy. topiCS aims to provide a forum for: -New communities of researchers- New controversies in established areas- Debates and commentaries- Reflections and integration The publication features multiple scholarly papers dedicated to a single topic. Some of these topics will appear together in one issue, but others may appear across several issues or develop into a regular feature. Controversies or debates started in one issue may be followed up by commentaries in a later issue, etc. However, the format and origin of the topics will vary greatly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信