Who is being heard? Implementing change with people from diverse and marginalized groups in aged care: a scoping review.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Amy Marshall, Alice Windle, Gill Harvey, Carol Davy
{"title":"Who is being heard? Implementing change with people from diverse and marginalized groups in aged care: a scoping review.","authors":"Amy Marshall, Alice Windle, Gill Harvey, Carol Davy","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many older people belong to diverse and marginalized groups, with care needs and preferences outside of normative aged care services. Increasing the representation and contributions of these older people is central to an equity-sensitive implementation approach where adaptation to the context is critical.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review assessed the extent and nature of the literature on implementing change in aged care contexts serving older people who belong to diverse and marginalized groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review searched for literature examining the implementation of change in any aged care context where older people from diverse and marginalized groups access care. The search was conducted in the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases, and limited to papers published from 2013 onward. Of the 2,021 papers identified, 35 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (70%) of studies were in a residential aged care context, and only 25% used an implementation framework. Less than half (40%) engaged with diverse and marginalized older people or their representatives to understand their needs and preferences. The majority engaged instead with staff or other stakeholders, and most engagement (64%) was limited to lower-level consultation such as seeking feedback rather than involving, collaborating, or empowering stakeholders to ensure their perspectives improved the implementation process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is little in the literature about ensuring changes in aged care identify and meet the needs and priorities of diverse and marginalized older people. This suggests a pressing need for implementation science to pay greater attention to equity and inclusion in the aged care context.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A314.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many older people belong to diverse and marginalized groups, with care needs and preferences outside of normative aged care services. Increasing the representation and contributions of these older people is central to an equity-sensitive implementation approach where adaptation to the context is critical.

Objective: This review assessed the extent and nature of the literature on implementing change in aged care contexts serving older people who belong to diverse and marginalized groups.

Methods: This scoping review searched for literature examining the implementation of change in any aged care context where older people from diverse and marginalized groups access care. The search was conducted in the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases, and limited to papers published from 2013 onward. Of the 2,021 papers identified, 35 were included.

Results: The majority (70%) of studies were in a residential aged care context, and only 25% used an implementation framework. Less than half (40%) engaged with diverse and marginalized older people or their representatives to understand their needs and preferences. The majority engaged instead with staff or other stakeholders, and most engagement (64%) was limited to lower-level consultation such as seeking feedback rather than involving, collaborating, or empowering stakeholders to ensure their perspectives improved the implementation process.

Conclusions: There is little in the literature about ensuring changes in aged care identify and meet the needs and priorities of diverse and marginalized older people. This suggests a pressing need for implementation science to pay greater attention to equity and inclusion in the aged care context.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A314.

谁在被倾听?在老年护理中与来自不同和边缘群体的人实施变革:范围审查。
导言:许多老年人属于多样化和边缘化群体,他们的护理需求和偏好超出了规范的老年护理服务。增加这些老年人的代表性和贡献对于公平敏感的实施方法至关重要,因为适应环境至关重要。目的:本综述评估了在老年护理环境中实施变革的文献的范围和性质,这些文献为属于不同和边缘群体的老年人服务。方法:本综述检索了在不同和边缘群体老年人获得护理的任何老年护理背景下实施变革的文献。检索是在PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus和PsycINFO数据库中进行的,并且仅限于2013年以后发表的论文。在确定的2021篇论文中,有35篇被收录。结果:大多数(70%)的研究是在住宅老年护理背景下进行的,只有25%的研究使用了实施框架。不到一半(40%)的国家与多样化和边缘化的老年人或其代表接触,了解他们的需求和偏好。大多数人与员工或其他利益相关者进行了接触,而且大多数参与(64%)仅限于寻求反馈等较低层次的咨询,而不是让利益相关者参与、合作或授权,以确保他们的观点改善了实施过程。结论:文献中很少有关于确保老年护理的变化识别和满足不同和边缘化老年人的需求和优先事项。这表明实施科学迫切需要更多地关注老年护理背景下的公平和包容。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A314。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信