Angela D Evans, Victoria W Dykstra, Jonathan S Comer, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Tara S Peris, Donna B Pincus, Lindsay C Malloy
{"title":"Profiles of parent-reported family communication about the COVID-19 pandemic: Family predictors and child mental health correlates.","authors":"Angela D Evans, Victoria W Dykstra, Jonathan S Comer, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Tara S Peris, Donna B Pincus, Lindsay C Malloy","doi":"10.1037/dev0001927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined family factors (i.e., parenting style and relationship quality) at the beginning of the pandemic that predicted profiles of family communication about COVID-19 6 months later, as well as communication profile differences in child well-being. Parents (<i>N</i> = 1,025, 66% female, 33.8% male, 0.1% nonbinary) of children aged 5-17 years (<i>M</i><sub>child age</sub> = 11.03, <i>SD</i> = 3.38; 53.4% male children; 76.5% non-Hispanic White, 5.6% Black, 2.8% Asian/Pacific Islander, 2.9% Native American/Indigenous, 10.4% Hispanic/Latine, 2.1% another race or ethnicity; approximately half in households with income below $75,000/year) completed surveys during the initial COVID-19 lockdown in March 2020 (Time 1) and approximately 6 months later (Time 2) about their parenting styles, family relationship quality, family communication about the pandemic, and their child's mental health. Latent profile analysis revealed a five-profile solution of family communication profiles for children (5-11 years; <i>N</i> = 533) and a three-profile solution for adolescents (12-17 years; <i>N</i> = 492). Both parental reports of family relationship quality and parenting styles (Time 1) predicted communication profiles (Time 2), such that better relationship quality and higher authoritative parenting at the start of the pandemic predicted communication profiles characterized by lower avoidant communication and higher active communication about COVID-19. Conversely, lower relationship quality and higher authoritative parenting were predictive of subsequent membership in profiles that were high in both avoidant and active communication. Importantly, across both age groups, parents who reported being higher in both avoidant and active communication about COVID-19 reported higher child mental health problems, whereas parents reporting communication profiles characterized by low avoidance and high active communication reported better child mental health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examined family factors (i.e., parenting style and relationship quality) at the beginning of the pandemic that predicted profiles of family communication about COVID-19 6 months later, as well as communication profile differences in child well-being. Parents (N = 1,025, 66% female, 33.8% male, 0.1% nonbinary) of children aged 5-17 years (Mchild age = 11.03, SD = 3.38; 53.4% male children; 76.5% non-Hispanic White, 5.6% Black, 2.8% Asian/Pacific Islander, 2.9% Native American/Indigenous, 10.4% Hispanic/Latine, 2.1% another race or ethnicity; approximately half in households with income below $75,000/year) completed surveys during the initial COVID-19 lockdown in March 2020 (Time 1) and approximately 6 months later (Time 2) about their parenting styles, family relationship quality, family communication about the pandemic, and their child's mental health. Latent profile analysis revealed a five-profile solution of family communication profiles for children (5-11 years; N = 533) and a three-profile solution for adolescents (12-17 years; N = 492). Both parental reports of family relationship quality and parenting styles (Time 1) predicted communication profiles (Time 2), such that better relationship quality and higher authoritative parenting at the start of the pandemic predicted communication profiles characterized by lower avoidant communication and higher active communication about COVID-19. Conversely, lower relationship quality and higher authoritative parenting were predictive of subsequent membership in profiles that were high in both avoidant and active communication. Importantly, across both age groups, parents who reported being higher in both avoidant and active communication about COVID-19 reported higher child mental health problems, whereas parents reporting communication profiles characterized by low avoidance and high active communication reported better child mental health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.