[A systematic review of childhood cancer-related fatigue assessment tools based on the COSMIN guidelines].

Q3 Medicine

中国当代儿科杂志 Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2408132

Qian Zhao, Yu Wang, Lan-Zheng Bian

{"title":"[A systematic review of childhood cancer-related fatigue assessment tools based on the COSMIN guidelines].","authors":"Qian Zhao, Yu Wang, Lan-Zheng Bian","doi":"10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2408132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To systematically review the methodological quality and measurement properties of childhood cancer-related fatigue assessment tools based on the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) guidelines, providing a basis for clinical practitioners to select appropriate assessment tools.Methods: The databases searched included China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, China Biomedical Literature, Weipu, PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published up to January 2024. Children under 12 years old and their primary caregivers were enrolled as subjects. Articles were screened based on inclusion criteria, and the key information regarding the assessment tools was extracted. The risk of bias checklist from the COSMIN guidelines and the quality standard rating scale were employed to evaluate measurement properties and formulate final recommendations.Results: A total of 18 articles were included, covering 7 fatigue measurement tools, consisting of 4 specific tools and 3 generic tools tools. Methodological differences were observed in measurement properties across these scales. The Chinese Version of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (C-Ped-PROMIS) was rated as grade A recommendation due to its adequate content validity and internal consistency, while the remaining six scales were rated as grade B recommendation since their content validity was assessed as \"insufficient\" based on moderate-level evidence or higher.Conclusions: The C-Ped-PROMIS scale demonstrates good reliability, validity, and cross-cultural validity as the preferred tool for measuring childhood cancer-related fatigue. The scale can serve as an auxiliary tool, and future research should focus on the applicability of various tools to enhance the effectiveness of interventions for assessing childhood cancer-related fatigue.","PeriodicalId":39792,"journal":{"name":"中国当代儿科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"184-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国当代儿科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2408132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically review the methodological quality and measurement properties of childhood cancer-related fatigue assessment tools based on the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) guidelines, providing a basis for clinical practitioners to select appropriate assessment tools.

Methods: The databases searched included China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, China Biomedical Literature, Weipu, PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published up to January 2024. Children under 12 years old and their primary caregivers were enrolled as subjects. Articles were screened based on inclusion criteria, and the key information regarding the assessment tools was extracted. The risk of bias checklist from the COSMIN guidelines and the quality standard rating scale were employed to evaluate measurement properties and formulate final recommendations.

Results: A total of 18 articles were included, covering 7 fatigue measurement tools, consisting of 4 specific tools and 3 generic tools tools. Methodological differences were observed in measurement properties across these scales. The Chinese Version of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (C-Ped-PROMIS) was rated as grade A recommendation due to its adequate content validity and internal consistency, while the remaining six scales were rated as grade B recommendation since their content validity was assessed as "insufficient" based on moderate-level evidence or higher.

Conclusions: The C-Ped-PROMIS scale demonstrates good reliability, validity, and cross-cultural validity as the preferred tool for measuring childhood cancer-related fatigue. The scale can serve as an auxiliary tool, and future research should focus on the applicability of various tools to enhance the effectiveness of interventions for assessing childhood cancer-related fatigue.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

中国当代儿科杂志 Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

5006

期刊介绍： The Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics (CJCP) is a peer-reviewed open access periodical in the field of pediatrics that is sponsored by the Central South University/Xiangya Hospital of Central South University and under the auspices of the Ministry of Education of China. It is cited as a source in the scientific and technological papers of Chinese journals, the Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), and is one of the core Chinese periodicals in the Peking University Library. CJCP has been indexed by MEDLINE/PubMed/PMC of the American National Library, American Chemical Abstracts (CA), Holland Medical Abstracts (EM), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPRIM), Scopus and EBSCO. It is a monthly periodical published on the 15th of every month, and is distributed both at home and overseas. The Chinese series publication number is CN 43-1301/R；ISSN 1008-8830. The tenet of CJCP is to “reflect the latest advances and be open to the world”. The periodical reports the most recent advances in the contemporary pediatric field. The majority of the readership is pediatric doctors and researchers.