Relevance of ecological momentary assessment for medication adherence in clinical settings: A precision psychiatry approach.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Valentine Chirokoff, Arnaud Tessier, Fuschia Serre, Maud Dupuy, Marc Auriacombe, Sandra Chanraud, Sylvie Berthoz, Melina Fatseas, David Misdrahi
{"title":"Relevance of ecological momentary assessment for medication adherence in clinical settings: A precision psychiatry approach.","authors":"Valentine Chirokoff, Arnaud Tessier, Fuschia Serre, Maud Dupuy, Marc Auriacombe, Sandra Chanraud, Sylvie Berthoz, Melina Fatseas, David Misdrahi","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication non-adherence is a leading cause of treatment failure in psychiatric populations. However, current studies highlight the lack of methodological guidance on medication assessments. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), using smartphone-based evaluations, shows promise for real-time monitoring in everyday settings.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study evaluated EMA's effectiveness in assessing medication adherence in patients with schizophrenia, depression, and substance use disorders (SUD), covering various treatment regimens.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>A total of 133 participants (27 with schizophrenia, 20 with depression, 44 with SUDs, and 42 healthy controls) completed EMA via study-provided smartphones five times daily over 1 week. Treatment regimens, categorized by mono vs. polytherapy and single vs. multiple daily doses, were documented. EMA adherence was calculated from the completion rate of the assessments, while medication adherence was assessed daily for patients. Both mean medication adherence and adherence variation over time were analysed by diagnosis and treatment regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups demonstrated high mean EMA and medication adherence, with minor variations across treatment types. Importantly, patients showed improved adherence over time, independently of diagnosis or regimen.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings indicate EMA's potential as an effective method for capturing medication adherence in psychiatric populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The approach's capacity for real-time, context-sensitive data collection could reveal adherence patterns and changes not detectable by conventional methods, offering valuable insights for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12532","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication non-adherence is a leading cause of treatment failure in psychiatric populations. However, current studies highlight the lack of methodological guidance on medication assessments. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), using smartphone-based evaluations, shows promise for real-time monitoring in everyday settings.

Aims: This study evaluated EMA's effectiveness in assessing medication adherence in patients with schizophrenia, depression, and substance use disorders (SUD), covering various treatment regimens.

Materials & methods: A total of 133 participants (27 with schizophrenia, 20 with depression, 44 with SUDs, and 42 healthy controls) completed EMA via study-provided smartphones five times daily over 1 week. Treatment regimens, categorized by mono vs. polytherapy and single vs. multiple daily doses, were documented. EMA adherence was calculated from the completion rate of the assessments, while medication adherence was assessed daily for patients. Both mean medication adherence and adherence variation over time were analysed by diagnosis and treatment regimen.

Results: All groups demonstrated high mean EMA and medication adherence, with minor variations across treatment types. Importantly, patients showed improved adherence over time, independently of diagnosis or regimen.

Discussion: These findings indicate EMA's potential as an effective method for capturing medication adherence in psychiatric populations.

Conclusion: The approach's capacity for real-time, context-sensitive data collection could reveal adherence patterns and changes not detectable by conventional methods, offering valuable insights for clinical practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信