Systematic Review and Comparative Outcomes Analysis of NHP Liver Allotransplants and Xenotransplants.

Abstract

Patients with fulminant liver failure ineligible for transplantation have a high mortality rate. With recent progress in genetic modifications and clinical achievements, using pig livers as a bridge-to-transplant has regained popularity. Preclinical testing has been done in small cohorts of nonhuman primates (NHP), and maximum survival is limited to 1-month. We conducted a systematic review and comparative outcomes analysis of NHP-liver xenotransplantation and gathered 203 pig-to-NHP and NHP-to-NHP transplants reported in 23 studies. Overall, NHP survival after pig-liver xenotransplantation was limited (1, 3, 4 weeks: 18.0%, 5.6%, 1.1%), compared to NHPs after allotransplantation (1, 3, 4 weeks: 60.6%, 47.4%, 45.4%). A focus on pigs with genetic modifications evidenced some short-term survival benefits (1, 3, 4 weeks: 29.1%, 9.1%, 1.8%). The use of the auxiliary transplant technique was also associated with better short-term results (1, 3, 4 weeks: 40.9%, 9.1%, 4.5%). Causes of graft and animal loss were mostly rejection and liver failure in allotransplants, while bleeding, liver, and respiratory failure predominated in xenotransplants. Notably, the 1-month survival rate for NHP-allotransplants was significantly lower than the national > 98% rate for human liver transplants. This data confirms the short-term improvements brought by genetic modifications and auxiliary implantation in the NHP model, which remains imperfect.