Performance of real-time continuous glucose monitoring during track and field training in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Q3 Medicine
Rebecca T Zimmer, Felix Aberer, Janis Schierbauer, Paul Zimmermann, Philipp Birnbaumer, Maria Fritsch, Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer, Peter Hofmann, Harald Sourij, Othmar Moser
{"title":"Performance of real-time continuous glucose monitoring during track and field training in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.","authors":"Rebecca T Zimmer, Felix Aberer, Janis Schierbauer, Paul Zimmermann, Philipp Birnbaumer, Maria Fritsch, Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer, Peter Hofmann, Harald Sourij, Othmar Moser","doi":"10.5114/pedm.2024.146685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) has become an integral component of modern diabetes management. However, sensor performance data of adolescents, especially during exercise, are scarce. Therefore, this investigation aimed to determine the performance of a rtCGM-system before, during, and after exercise around a 4-week track and field training intervention in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Eight adolescents (2 females, 15.5 ±1.0 years, BMI: 21.0 ±2.3 kg/m2) with T1D and an HbA1c of 7.0 ±0.6% (53.0 ±6.6 mmol/mol) participated in a 4-week track and field intervention consisting of three 60-minute exercise sessions per week. Sensor glucose levels (Dexcom G6; Dexcom Inc., San Diego, CA) were obtained at rest and after 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes during, as well as 5 minutes after exercise and compared to a reference capillary blood glucose value (Biosen S-Line, EKF Diagnostics, GER). rtCGM performance was assessed using the median absolute relative difference (MedARD) and interquartile range [IQR] as well as the Bland-Altman method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>443 points of comparison were available for analysis. The overall MedARD (IQR) was 19.1% (12.2-27.3). MedARDs for time in range (70-180 mg/dl), below range ( 180 mg/dl) were 22.0% (17.8-29.2), 28.4% (18.8-36.3), and 15.9% (9.4-20.7), respectively. The in-exercise MedARD was 19.4% (12.3-27.8), and pre- and post-exercise MedARDs were 21.6% (14.5-28.3) and 14.9% (9.0-21.6), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In structured track and field training involving adolescents with T1D, the accuracy of the Dexcom G6 system is limited. This supports the importance of considering glucose trend arrows and, when in doubt, blood measurements during exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":39165,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"30 4","pages":"211-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pedm.2024.146685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) has become an integral component of modern diabetes management. However, sensor performance data of adolescents, especially during exercise, are scarce. Therefore, this investigation aimed to determine the performance of a rtCGM-system before, during, and after exercise around a 4-week track and field training intervention in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Material and methods: Eight adolescents (2 females, 15.5 ±1.0 years, BMI: 21.0 ±2.3 kg/m2) with T1D and an HbA1c of 7.0 ±0.6% (53.0 ±6.6 mmol/mol) participated in a 4-week track and field intervention consisting of three 60-minute exercise sessions per week. Sensor glucose levels (Dexcom G6; Dexcom Inc., San Diego, CA) were obtained at rest and after 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes during, as well as 5 minutes after exercise and compared to a reference capillary blood glucose value (Biosen S-Line, EKF Diagnostics, GER). rtCGM performance was assessed using the median absolute relative difference (MedARD) and interquartile range [IQR] as well as the Bland-Altman method.

Results: 443 points of comparison were available for analysis. The overall MedARD (IQR) was 19.1% (12.2-27.3). MedARDs for time in range (70-180 mg/dl), below range ( 180 mg/dl) were 22.0% (17.8-29.2), 28.4% (18.8-36.3), and 15.9% (9.4-20.7), respectively. The in-exercise MedARD was 19.4% (12.3-27.8), and pre- and post-exercise MedARDs were 21.6% (14.5-28.3) and 14.9% (9.0-21.6), respectively.

Conclusions: In structured track and field training involving adolescents with T1D, the accuracy of the Dexcom G6 system is limited. This supports the importance of considering glucose trend arrows and, when in doubt, blood measurements during exercise.

青少年1型糖尿病田径训练中实时连续血糖监测的效果
实时连续血糖监测(rtCGM)已成为现代糖尿病管理的重要组成部分。然而,青少年的传感器性能数据,特别是在运动过程中,是稀缺的。因此,本研究旨在确定rtcgm系统在1型糖尿病青少年(T1D)进行为期4周的田径训练干预之前、期间和之后的表现。材料与方法:8名青少年(2名女性,15.5±1.0岁,BMI: 21.0±2.3 kg/m2),患有T1D, HbA1c为7.0±0.6%(53.0±6.6 mmol/mol),参加为期4周的田径干预,包括每周3次60分钟的运动。传感器血糖水平(Dexcom G6;Dexcom Inc., San Diego, CA)在休息、运动期间15、30、45、60分钟以及运动后5分钟获得的数据,并与参考毛细血管血糖值(Biosen S-Line, EKF Diagnostics, GER)进行比较。采用中位数绝对相对差(MedARD)和四分位间距(IQR)以及Bland-Altman方法评估rtCGM的性能。结果:共有443个比较点可供分析。总MedARD (IQR)为19.1%(12.2-27.3)。在(70-180 mg/dl)范围内、低于(180 mg/dl)范围内的时间标准分别为22.0%(17.8-29.2)、28.4%(18.8-36.3)和15.9%(9.4-20.7)。运动中MedARD为19.4%(12.3-27.8),运动前和运动后MedARD分别为21.6%(14.5-28.3)和14.9%(9.0-21.6)。结论:在青少年T1D的结构化田径训练中,Dexcom G6系统的准确性是有限的。这支持了考虑血糖趋势箭头的重要性,当有疑问时,考虑运动期间的血液测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信