[Evaluation of Annual Straw Return Based on Soil Carbon Pool and Crop Yield in Wheat-maize Cropping System].

Q2 Environmental Science
Qun-Wen Wu, Pei-Hong Song, Jian-Hua Huang, Xin Qian, Ying-Bo Gao, Hui Zhang, Kai-Chang Liu, Liang Wang, Zong-Xin Li
{"title":"[Evaluation of Annual Straw Return Based on Soil Carbon Pool and Crop Yield in Wheat-maize Cropping System].","authors":"Qun-Wen Wu, Pei-Hong Song, Jian-Hua Huang, Xin Qian, Ying-Bo Gao, Hui Zhang, Kai-Chang Liu, Liang Wang, Zong-Xin Li","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202401267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The treatment and recycling of crop straws has become a hot spot in the field of agricultural research, with the need to optimize the management of wheat-maize annual straws, improve the carbon efficiency of cropping systems, and promote the sustainable production of wheat-maize annual straw. Based on an 8-year long-term field trial, two treatments, wheat-maize double cropping (WS-MS) and wheat-maize single cropping (WS-MN), were set up, and the effects of straw returning on soil organic carbon (TOC) content, oxidizable organic carbon (EOOC) content, soil carbon storage, carbon pool management index (CPMI), carbon use efficiency, and crop yield were compared between WS-MS and WS-MN treatments. The results showed that the content of TOC in WS-MS and WS-MN increased by 8.1% and 5.5%, respectively, and the content of EOOC in WS-MS and WS-MN increased by 50.4% and 45.5%, respectively. The WS-MS and WS-MN treatments increased organic carbon storage by 20.5% and 18.3%, respectively, but the WS-MS treatment did not significantly increase organic carbon storage compared with that in the WS-MN treatment. The carbon pool index (CPI), carbon pool activity (CPA), carbon pool activity index (CPAI), and CPMI of WS-MS were 3.7%, 20.5%, 2.2%, and 7.9% higher than those of WS-MN, respectively. The annual yield of WS-MN was 0.2% higher than that of WS-MS. The annual production efficiency and ecological efficiency of WS-MN were 136.1% and 64.2% higher than those of WS-MS, respectively. The carbon benefit of the WS-MN treatment was significantly higher than that of the WS-MS treatment. Therefore, considering the straw return method, straw carbon utilization efficiency, and crop yield, the single season return of wheat straw is more suitable for the efficient utilization of annual straw resources in the intensive wheat-maize double cropping system in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region, without significantly affecting the annual grain yield of wheat-miaze and its soil carbon pool.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 2","pages":"1016-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202401267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The treatment and recycling of crop straws has become a hot spot in the field of agricultural research, with the need to optimize the management of wheat-maize annual straws, improve the carbon efficiency of cropping systems, and promote the sustainable production of wheat-maize annual straw. Based on an 8-year long-term field trial, two treatments, wheat-maize double cropping (WS-MS) and wheat-maize single cropping (WS-MN), were set up, and the effects of straw returning on soil organic carbon (TOC) content, oxidizable organic carbon (EOOC) content, soil carbon storage, carbon pool management index (CPMI), carbon use efficiency, and crop yield were compared between WS-MS and WS-MN treatments. The results showed that the content of TOC in WS-MS and WS-MN increased by 8.1% and 5.5%, respectively, and the content of EOOC in WS-MS and WS-MN increased by 50.4% and 45.5%, respectively. The WS-MS and WS-MN treatments increased organic carbon storage by 20.5% and 18.3%, respectively, but the WS-MS treatment did not significantly increase organic carbon storage compared with that in the WS-MN treatment. The carbon pool index (CPI), carbon pool activity (CPA), carbon pool activity index (CPAI), and CPMI of WS-MS were 3.7%, 20.5%, 2.2%, and 7.9% higher than those of WS-MN, respectively. The annual yield of WS-MN was 0.2% higher than that of WS-MS. The annual production efficiency and ecological efficiency of WS-MN were 136.1% and 64.2% higher than those of WS-MS, respectively. The carbon benefit of the WS-MN treatment was significantly higher than that of the WS-MS treatment. Therefore, considering the straw return method, straw carbon utilization efficiency, and crop yield, the single season return of wheat straw is more suitable for the efficient utilization of annual straw resources in the intensive wheat-maize double cropping system in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region, without significantly affecting the annual grain yield of wheat-miaze and its soil carbon pool.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信