{"title":"Effects of somatosensory discrimination training on motor and functional recovery in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Federico Temporiti, Giorgia Marino, Paola Adamo, Claudio Cordani, Roberto Gatti","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2025.2463285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Somatosensory discrimination training (SDT) consists of a peripheral stimulation of somatosensory receptors followed by the request to discriminate among different stimuli features. Such approach has been adopted to promote motor learning after stroke, but results are still controversial. This systematic review aimed at investigating SDT effects on motor and functional recovery in patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from inception until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of SDT delivered alone and/or in combination with other rehabilitative approaches in patients with stroke were included. Two reviewers performed data extraction and assessed methodological quality using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pooled or un-pooled effects were computed as mean difference or standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval, while evidence certainty was rated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies (264 participants) were included. Low evidence supported SDT plus task-oriented rehabilitation to improve upper limb function (MD 0.2 points, CI<sub>95</sub> 0.1, 0.3 points on Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremities) and gait performance (MD 0.21 m/s, CI<sub>95</sub> 0.15, 0.27 m/s on 10-Meter Walk Test from a single study) after stroke, while no effects were found for motor impairment, manual dexterity, static balance and disability (low to very low evidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of SDT to task-oriented rehabilitation led to better motor and functional improvements than task-oriented rehabilitation alone in patients with stroke. However, evidence certainty was very low to low and further high-quality studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2463285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Somatosensory discrimination training (SDT) consists of a peripheral stimulation of somatosensory receptors followed by the request to discriminate among different stimuli features. Such approach has been adopted to promote motor learning after stroke, but results are still controversial. This systematic review aimed at investigating SDT effects on motor and functional recovery in patients with stroke.
Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from inception until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of SDT delivered alone and/or in combination with other rehabilitative approaches in patients with stroke were included. Two reviewers performed data extraction and assessed methodological quality using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pooled or un-pooled effects were computed as mean difference or standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval, while evidence certainty was rated using the GRADE approach.
Results: Nine studies (264 participants) were included. Low evidence supported SDT plus task-oriented rehabilitation to improve upper limb function (MD 0.2 points, CI95 0.1, 0.3 points on Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremities) and gait performance (MD 0.21 m/s, CI95 0.15, 0.27 m/s on 10-Meter Walk Test from a single study) after stroke, while no effects were found for motor impairment, manual dexterity, static balance and disability (low to very low evidence).
Conclusions: The addition of SDT to task-oriented rehabilitation led to better motor and functional improvements than task-oriented rehabilitation alone in patients with stroke. However, evidence certainty was very low to low and further high-quality studies are required.
期刊介绍:
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues.
The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.