Effects of somatosensory discrimination training on motor and functional recovery in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Federico Temporiti, Giorgia Marino, Paola Adamo, Claudio Cordani, Roberto Gatti
{"title":"Effects of somatosensory discrimination training on motor and functional recovery in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Federico Temporiti, Giorgia Marino, Paola Adamo, Claudio Cordani, Roberto Gatti","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2025.2463285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Somatosensory discrimination training (SDT) consists of a peripheral stimulation of somatosensory receptors followed by the request to discriminate among different stimuli features. Such approach has been adopted to promote motor learning after stroke, but results are still controversial. This systematic review aimed at investigating SDT effects on motor and functional recovery in patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from inception until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of SDT delivered alone and/or in combination with other rehabilitative approaches in patients with stroke were included. Two reviewers performed data extraction and assessed methodological quality using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pooled or un-pooled effects were computed as mean difference or standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval, while evidence certainty was rated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies (264 participants) were included. Low evidence supported SDT plus task-oriented rehabilitation to improve upper limb function (MD 0.2 points, CI<sub>95</sub> 0.1, 0.3 points on Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremities) and gait performance (MD 0.21 m/s, CI<sub>95</sub> 0.15, 0.27 m/s on 10-Meter Walk Test from a single study) after stroke, while no effects were found for motor impairment, manual dexterity, static balance and disability (low to very low evidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of SDT to task-oriented rehabilitation led to better motor and functional improvements than task-oriented rehabilitation alone in patients with stroke. However, evidence certainty was very low to low and further high-quality studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2463285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Somatosensory discrimination training (SDT) consists of a peripheral stimulation of somatosensory receptors followed by the request to discriminate among different stimuli features. Such approach has been adopted to promote motor learning after stroke, but results are still controversial. This systematic review aimed at investigating SDT effects on motor and functional recovery in patients with stroke.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from inception until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of SDT delivered alone and/or in combination with other rehabilitative approaches in patients with stroke were included. Two reviewers performed data extraction and assessed methodological quality using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pooled or un-pooled effects were computed as mean difference or standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval, while evidence certainty was rated using the GRADE approach.

Results: Nine studies (264 participants) were included. Low evidence supported SDT plus task-oriented rehabilitation to improve upper limb function (MD 0.2 points, CI95 0.1, 0.3 points on Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremities) and gait performance (MD 0.21 m/s, CI95 0.15, 0.27 m/s on 10-Meter Walk Test from a single study) after stroke, while no effects were found for motor impairment, manual dexterity, static balance and disability (low to very low evidence).

Conclusions: The addition of SDT to task-oriented rehabilitation led to better motor and functional improvements than task-oriented rehabilitation alone in patients with stroke. However, evidence certainty was very low to low and further high-quality studies are required.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信