[Analysis of Soil Property Factors Restricting the Remediation Effect of Passivators on Arsenic and Cadmium Pollution in Purple Soil].

Q2 Environmental Science
De-Cai Jiang, Zhen-Mao Jiang, Shi-Qiang Wei
{"title":"[Analysis of Soil Property Factors Restricting the Remediation Effect of Passivators on Arsenic and Cadmium Pollution in Purple Soil].","authors":"De-Cai Jiang, Zhen-Mao Jiang, Shi-Qiang Wei","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202402102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of passivating agents on Cd and As is closely related to soil properties. Optimizing passivating agents that adapt to soil properties is the key basis for the application of passivation technology. This study uses eight types of purple soils with widely different properties as test soils, uses indoor culture experiments, sets different pollution conditions, and simultaneously compares the passivation rates of cadmium (Cd) and arsenic (As) by seven common passivators. Additionally, combined with the measurement of soil physical and chemical properties, the relationship between passivation efficiency and soil properties was explored. The results showed that among the seven common passivators tested, calcium oxide, organic fertilizer, silicon calcium magnesium fertilizer, humic acid, and hydroxyapatite had a significant passivation effect on purple soil Cd, and iron oxide, silicon calcium magnesium fertilizer, hydroxyapatite, and humic acid had a passivating effect on As. Only three passivating agents, calcium silicon magnesium fertilizer, hydroxyapatite, and humic acid, had a passivating effect on both Cd and As. Great differences exist in the key soil property factors that determined the passivation efficiency of specific passivators: soil organic matter, clay content, and total potassium were significantly positively correlated with the passivation rate of soil Cd by the tested passivators; soil pH, free iron oxide, free manganese oxide, and total phosphorus were significantly negatively correlated with them; soil CEC, free manganese oxide, and soil total As were significantly positively correlated with the As passivation rate of the tested passivators; and the content of soil clay particles was significantly negatively correlated with it. The study established the optimal multiple linear regression model between the passivation efficiency of passivating agents Cd and As and the soil properties and pollution characteristics of purple soil. The model quantitatively reflects the relationship between the passivation efficiency of heavy metals and soil properties and can be used to predict and optimize adaptation accordingly. Highly efficient passivators with different soil properties provide a scientific basis for the safe use of regionally contaminated farmland.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 2","pages":"1130-1144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202402102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of passivating agents on Cd and As is closely related to soil properties. Optimizing passivating agents that adapt to soil properties is the key basis for the application of passivation technology. This study uses eight types of purple soils with widely different properties as test soils, uses indoor culture experiments, sets different pollution conditions, and simultaneously compares the passivation rates of cadmium (Cd) and arsenic (As) by seven common passivators. Additionally, combined with the measurement of soil physical and chemical properties, the relationship between passivation efficiency and soil properties was explored. The results showed that among the seven common passivators tested, calcium oxide, organic fertilizer, silicon calcium magnesium fertilizer, humic acid, and hydroxyapatite had a significant passivation effect on purple soil Cd, and iron oxide, silicon calcium magnesium fertilizer, hydroxyapatite, and humic acid had a passivating effect on As. Only three passivating agents, calcium silicon magnesium fertilizer, hydroxyapatite, and humic acid, had a passivating effect on both Cd and As. Great differences exist in the key soil property factors that determined the passivation efficiency of specific passivators: soil organic matter, clay content, and total potassium were significantly positively correlated with the passivation rate of soil Cd by the tested passivators; soil pH, free iron oxide, free manganese oxide, and total phosphorus were significantly negatively correlated with them; soil CEC, free manganese oxide, and soil total As were significantly positively correlated with the As passivation rate of the tested passivators; and the content of soil clay particles was significantly negatively correlated with it. The study established the optimal multiple linear regression model between the passivation efficiency of passivating agents Cd and As and the soil properties and pollution characteristics of purple soil. The model quantitatively reflects the relationship between the passivation efficiency of heavy metals and soil properties and can be used to predict and optimize adaptation accordingly. Highly efficient passivators with different soil properties provide a scientific basis for the safe use of regionally contaminated farmland.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信