Evaluating a User-centered Redesign of the NYC Environment and Health Data Portal Website.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Matthew Montesano, Chris Gettings, Emily Torem
{"title":"Evaluating a User-centered Redesign of the NYC Environment and Health Data Portal Website.","authors":"Matthew Montesano, Chris Gettings, Emily Torem","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Public health agencies publish data so that data can influence public health policy and practice and improve the public health. But when these websites are difficult to use, they present barriers to this goal. Working to make data websites easier to use can add value to public health work.</p><p><strong>Program: </strong>In 2022, the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene redesigned the Environment and Health Data Portal website to communicate data more effectively by improving usability. The redesigned website lets users browse datasets, visualize them, and includes companion explanatory material to communicate key public health findings.</p><p><strong>Implementation: </strong>We evaluated the usability as an outcome of the redesign and compared it to the usability of the prior website. Using a cross-over design, participants did simple tasks on both old and new websites, then filled out the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire, a standard usability instrument.</p><p><strong>Evaluation: </strong>Participants scored the new site better than the old site, with statistically significant improvements in overall usability, system usefulness, and information. Additionally, web analytics show steadily increasing traffic to the new site, indicating that improved usability might have led to increased use.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This evaluation indicates a successful redesign: a measurable increase in usability and a substantial increase in web traffic. It suggests that designing data products for a wide range of users can be a successful strategy and demonstrate a viable method for evaluating public health data communication websites using a standard usability instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Public health agencies publish data so that data can influence public health policy and practice and improve the public health. But when these websites are difficult to use, they present barriers to this goal. Working to make data websites easier to use can add value to public health work.

Program: In 2022, the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene redesigned the Environment and Health Data Portal website to communicate data more effectively by improving usability. The redesigned website lets users browse datasets, visualize them, and includes companion explanatory material to communicate key public health findings.

Implementation: We evaluated the usability as an outcome of the redesign and compared it to the usability of the prior website. Using a cross-over design, participants did simple tasks on both old and new websites, then filled out the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire, a standard usability instrument.

Evaluation: Participants scored the new site better than the old site, with statistically significant improvements in overall usability, system usefulness, and information. Additionally, web analytics show steadily increasing traffic to the new site, indicating that improved usability might have led to increased use.

Discussion: This evaluation indicates a successful redesign: a measurable increase in usability and a substantial increase in web traffic. It suggests that designing data products for a wide range of users can be a successful strategy and demonstrate a viable method for evaluating public health data communication websites using a standard usability instrument.

背景:公共卫生机构发布数据是为了让数据能够影响公共卫生政策和实践,改善公众健康。但是,如果这些网站难以使用,就会阻碍实现这一目标。努力使数据网站更易于使用,可以为公共卫生工作增添价值:2022 年,纽约市健康与心理卫生局重新设计了环境与健康数据门户网站,通过提高可用性来更有效地传播数据。重新设计后的网站可让用户浏览数据集,将其可视化,并包含配套的解释材料,以传达关键的公共卫生调查结果:我们对重新设计后的可用性进行了评估,并与之前网站的可用性进行了比较。通过交叉设计,参与者在新旧网站上都做了简单的任务,然后填写了标准可用性工具--研究后系统可用性问卷:评估:参与者对新网站的评分高于旧网站,在整体可用性、系统实用性和信息方面都有显著改善。此外,网站分析显示,新网站的访问量稳步上升,这表明可用性的提高可能导致了使用量的增加:这次评估表明重新设计是成功的:可用性有了显著提高,网站流量也大幅增加。它表明,为广泛的用户设计数据产品是一种成功的策略,并展示了一种使用标准可用性工具评估公共卫生数据通信网站的可行方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信