The modern pattern of insect herbivory predates the advent of angiosperms by 60 My.

IF 9.4 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Lifang Xiao, Liang Chen, Conrad C Labandeira, Lauren Azevedo-Schmidt, Yongjie Wang, Dong Ren
{"title":"The modern pattern of insect herbivory predates the advent of angiosperms by 60 My.","authors":"Lifang Xiao, Liang Chen, Conrad C Labandeira, Lauren Azevedo-Schmidt, Yongjie Wang, Dong Ren","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2412036122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modern ecosystems display complex associations of plants-insects that underwent a long evolutionary process since the appearance of mid-Paleozoic vascular plants. Although several major hypotheses explain the evolution of these plant-insect associations, the initial pattern of modern insect herbivory is poorly understood. To understand the antiquity of modern patterns of terrestrial arthropod herbivory, functional feeding group-damage type (FFG-DT) data were used to analyze a 305 My interval from Late Pennsylvanian to present, in which 134 plant assemblages were used to assess turnover (replacement of some species by other species between sites) and nestedness (difference in composition when no species are replaced between sites) in pairwise comparisons of DTs. Results of beta diversity analyses indicate that the prototype pattern for modern insect herbivory was established on gymnosperm-dominated plant assemblages by late Middle Jurassic, antedating angiosperm dominance by 60 My. Turnover among plant groups and FFGs declined in earlier late Paleozoic, whereas during the later Cenozoic, nestedness generally increased. Insect feeding on gymnosperms showed one pattern of change with low turnover and high nestedness, whereas a bimodal pattern characterized angiosperms. Ferns and angiosperms exhibited less DT functional breadth (host-plant \"specificity\" by herbivores) than gymnosperms, reflecting major differences in links between insect herbivores and their host plants. This fundamental trophic shift is consistent with the Mid-Mesozoic Parasitoid Revolution, implying top-down control of herbivores by their consumers rather than bottom-up regulation of food sources that shaped the modern herbivory pattern. These findings provide a data-rich account of the ecological origins of modern herbivory.</p>","PeriodicalId":20548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","volume":"122 9","pages":"e2412036122"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2412036122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern ecosystems display complex associations of plants-insects that underwent a long evolutionary process since the appearance of mid-Paleozoic vascular plants. Although several major hypotheses explain the evolution of these plant-insect associations, the initial pattern of modern insect herbivory is poorly understood. To understand the antiquity of modern patterns of terrestrial arthropod herbivory, functional feeding group-damage type (FFG-DT) data were used to analyze a 305 My interval from Late Pennsylvanian to present, in which 134 plant assemblages were used to assess turnover (replacement of some species by other species between sites) and nestedness (difference in composition when no species are replaced between sites) in pairwise comparisons of DTs. Results of beta diversity analyses indicate that the prototype pattern for modern insect herbivory was established on gymnosperm-dominated plant assemblages by late Middle Jurassic, antedating angiosperm dominance by 60 My. Turnover among plant groups and FFGs declined in earlier late Paleozoic, whereas during the later Cenozoic, nestedness generally increased. Insect feeding on gymnosperms showed one pattern of change with low turnover and high nestedness, whereas a bimodal pattern characterized angiosperms. Ferns and angiosperms exhibited less DT functional breadth (host-plant "specificity" by herbivores) than gymnosperms, reflecting major differences in links between insect herbivores and their host plants. This fundamental trophic shift is consistent with the Mid-Mesozoic Parasitoid Revolution, implying top-down control of herbivores by their consumers rather than bottom-up regulation of food sources that shaped the modern herbivory pattern. These findings provide a data-rich account of the ecological origins of modern herbivory.

自古生代中期维管植物出现以来,现代生态系统经历了漫长的进化过程,显示出复杂的植物-昆虫联合体。尽管有几种主要假说可以解释这些植物-昆虫结合体的进化,但人们对现代昆虫食草的最初模式知之甚少。为了了解现代陆生节肢动物食草模式的古老性,我们利用功能取食群-损害类型(FFG-DT)数据分析了从晚彭斯凡尼世至今的 305 My 间隔,其中 134 种植物组合用于评估 DTs 配对比较中的更替(不同地点之间某些物种被其他物种取代)和嵌套性(不同地点之间没有物种被取代时的组成差异)。贝塔多样性分析的结果表明,现代昆虫食草的原型模式是在中侏罗世晚期在裸子植物占优势的植物群落中建立起来的,比被子植物占优势早 60 英里。在晚古生代早期,植物类群和FFGs之间的更替减少,而在新生代晚期,嵌套性普遍增加。昆虫对裸子植物的取食呈现出一种低更替率和高嵌套度的变化模式,而被子植物则呈现出一种双峰模式。蕨类植物和被子植物的 DT 功能广度(食草动物对寄主植物的 "专一性")低于裸子植物,这反映了昆虫食草动物与其寄主植物之间联系的重大差异。这种根本性的营养变化与中生代寄生虫革命是一致的,意味着食草动物的消费者对食草动物的控制是自上而下的,而不是形成现代食草模式的食物来源的自下而上的调节。这些发现以丰富的数据说明了现代食草动物的生态起源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
3575
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer-reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), serves as an authoritative source for high-impact, original research across the biological, physical, and social sciences. With a global scope, the journal welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide, making it an inclusive platform for advancing scientific knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信