Diagnostic performance of S100B assay for intracranial hemorrhage detection in patients with mild traumatic brain injury under antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.
Paul-André Poislane, Mathilde Papin, Damien Masson, Nicolas Goffinet, Arthur David, Quentin Le Bastard, Hugo De Carvalho
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of S100B assay for intracranial hemorrhage detection in patients with mild traumatic brain injury under antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.","authors":"Paul-André Poislane, Mathilde Papin, Damien Masson, Nicolas Goffinet, Arthur David, Quentin Le Bastard, Hugo De Carvalho","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-89927-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The sampling of S100B protein has been proposed as a screening tool to identify patients with a low risk of post-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Its performance for patients on antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants is still debatable. This exploratory study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of S100B concentrations, measured within 3 h of head trauma, to rule out intracranial hemorrhage in adults on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. This prospective study enrolled adult patients presenting for head trauma within the last 3 h and under antiplatelets or anticoagulants. We hypothesized that a S100B concentration under 0,100 µg.L<sup>-1</sup> rule out intracranial hemorrhage with a negative predictive value over 0,99. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were analyzed. From June 2020 to January 2023, 155 patients were included. 119 patients had a S100B level at 0,100 µg.L<sup>-1</sup> or over. 8 had an intracranial hemorrhage. The sensitivity of S100B was 1 (95%CI 0,68-1), specificity was 0,25 (95%CI 0,18 - 0,32), positive predictive value was 0,07 (95%CI 0.03-0.13), negative predictive value was 1 (95%CI 0,90 - 1). This study suggests that when performed in a 3-hour period after mild head trauma, S100B measurement is an accurate screening tool to rule out intracranial hemorrhage in patients treated with antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"5741"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89927-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The sampling of S100B protein has been proposed as a screening tool to identify patients with a low risk of post-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Its performance for patients on antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants is still debatable. This exploratory study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of S100B concentrations, measured within 3 h of head trauma, to rule out intracranial hemorrhage in adults on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. This prospective study enrolled adult patients presenting for head trauma within the last 3 h and under antiplatelets or anticoagulants. We hypothesized that a S100B concentration under 0,100 µg.L-1 rule out intracranial hemorrhage with a negative predictive value over 0,99. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were analyzed. From June 2020 to January 2023, 155 patients were included. 119 patients had a S100B level at 0,100 µg.L-1 or over. 8 had an intracranial hemorrhage. The sensitivity of S100B was 1 (95%CI 0,68-1), specificity was 0,25 (95%CI 0,18 - 0,32), positive predictive value was 0,07 (95%CI 0.03-0.13), negative predictive value was 1 (95%CI 0,90 - 1). This study suggests that when performed in a 3-hour period after mild head trauma, S100B measurement is an accurate screening tool to rule out intracranial hemorrhage in patients treated with antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.