Bicarbonate-buffered solution versus Plasma-Lyte™ in orthotopic adult liver transplantation: a pilot open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Fumitaka Yanase, Laurence Weinberg, Michael Jiang, Varun Peri, Rebecca Caragata, Jian Wen Chan, Lachlan F Miles, Shervin Tosif, Louise Ellard, Peter McCall, Brett Pearce, David A Story, Param Pillai, Antony Leaver, Hannah Perlman, Jinesh Patel, Glenn Eastwood, Dong Kyu Lee, Rinaldo Bellomo
{"title":"Bicarbonate-buffered solution versus Plasma-Lyte™ in orthotopic adult liver transplantation: a pilot open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial.","authors":"Fumitaka Yanase, Laurence Weinberg, Michael Jiang, Varun Peri, Rebecca Caragata, Jian Wen Chan, Lachlan F Miles, Shervin Tosif, Louise Ellard, Peter McCall, Brett Pearce, David A Story, Param Pillai, Antony Leaver, Hannah Perlman, Jinesh Patel, Glenn Eastwood, Dong Kyu Lee, Rinaldo Bellomo","doi":"10.4097/kja.24677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ideal intravenous (IV) maintenance and resuscitation fluid for patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains unknown. We aimed to determine whether bicarbonate-buffered solution was non-inferior to Plasma-Lyte™ in preventing metabolic acidosis during OLT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot single-center, open-label, randomized trial to compare the physiological effects of intravascular volume maintenance with a bicarbonate-buffered solution vs. Plasma-Lyte™ in adults undergoing OLT. Non-inferiority was defined as a median difference in the standard base excess (SBE) of less than -2.5 mEq/L. The primary endpoint was the standard base excess (SBE) at 5 minutes post-reperfusion. Quantile regression analysis was applied to confirm non-inferiority. Secondary endpoints included other forms of acid-base and electrolyte imbalances at pre-specified time points and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomized 52 adults undergoing OLT. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) volume infused was 5000 (3125, 7000) ml in the bicarbonate-buffered solution group and 5500 (4000, 10,500) ml in the Plasma-Lyte™ group (P = 0.37). The median (IQR) SBE at 5 minutes post-reperfusion was -4.857 (-6.231, -3.565) mEq/L in patients receiving bicarbonate-buffered solution and -4.749 (-7.574, -2.963) mEq/L amongst those in the Plasma-Lyte™ group. The estimated median difference by quantile regression was -0.043 mEq/L (95% CI -1.988 to 1.902 mEq/L; (one-sided P = 0.015). There were no significant differences in the acid-base secondary outcomes, number of complications, or patient mortality. There were no reported adverse events or safety concerns associated with the use of either solution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A bicarbonate-buffered solution was non-inferior to Plasma-Lyte™ for maintaining acid-base homeostasis post-reperfusion in OLT patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ideal intravenous (IV) maintenance and resuscitation fluid for patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains unknown. We aimed to determine whether bicarbonate-buffered solution was non-inferior to Plasma-Lyte™ in preventing metabolic acidosis during OLT.

Methods: We conducted a pilot single-center, open-label, randomized trial to compare the physiological effects of intravascular volume maintenance with a bicarbonate-buffered solution vs. Plasma-Lyte™ in adults undergoing OLT. Non-inferiority was defined as a median difference in the standard base excess (SBE) of less than -2.5 mEq/L. The primary endpoint was the standard base excess (SBE) at 5 minutes post-reperfusion. Quantile regression analysis was applied to confirm non-inferiority. Secondary endpoints included other forms of acid-base and electrolyte imbalances at pre-specified time points and postoperative complications.

Results: We randomized 52 adults undergoing OLT. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) volume infused was 5000 (3125, 7000) ml in the bicarbonate-buffered solution group and 5500 (4000, 10,500) ml in the Plasma-Lyte™ group (P = 0.37). The median (IQR) SBE at 5 minutes post-reperfusion was -4.857 (-6.231, -3.565) mEq/L in patients receiving bicarbonate-buffered solution and -4.749 (-7.574, -2.963) mEq/L amongst those in the Plasma-Lyte™ group. The estimated median difference by quantile regression was -0.043 mEq/L (95% CI -1.988 to 1.902 mEq/L; (one-sided P = 0.015). There were no significant differences in the acid-base secondary outcomes, number of complications, or patient mortality. There were no reported adverse events or safety concerns associated with the use of either solution.

Conclusions: A bicarbonate-buffered solution was non-inferior to Plasma-Lyte™ for maintaining acid-base homeostasis post-reperfusion in OLT patients.

碳酸氢盐缓冲溶液与血浆- lyte™在原位成人肝移植中的对比:一项开放标签、随机、非劣效性试验
背景:对于接受原位肝移植(OLT)的患者来说,理想的静脉(IV)维持和复苏液体仍然是未知的。我们的目的是确定碳酸氢盐缓冲溶液在预防OLT期间代谢性酸中毒方面是否优于血浆- lyte™。方法:我们进行了一项单中心、开放标签、随机试验,比较碳酸氢盐缓冲溶液和血浆- lyte™对成人OLT血管内容量维持的生理影响。非劣效性定义为标准基础过量(SBE)的中位数差异小于-2.5 mEq/L。主要终点是再灌注后5分钟的标准基础过量(SBE)。分位数回归分析证实非劣效性。次要终点包括其他形式的酸碱和电解质失衡在预先指定的时间点和术后并发症。结果:我们随机选择了52名接受OLT的成年人。碳酸氢盐缓冲溶液组的中位数(四分位数间距[IQR])输注量为5000 (3125,7000)ml, Plasma-Lyte™组为5500 (4000,10,500)ml (P = 0.37)。再灌注后5分钟,接受碳酸氢盐缓冲溶液的患者的中位(IQR) SBE为-4.857 (-6.231,-3.565)mEq/L,血浆- lyte™组为-4.749 (-7.574,-2.963)mEq/L。分位数回归估计的中位数差异为-0.043 mEq/L (95% CI为-1.988至1.902 mEq/L;(单侧P = 0.015)。在酸碱二级结局、并发症数量或患者死亡率方面没有显著差异。没有报告与使用这两种溶液相关的不良事件或安全问题。结论:在OLT患者再灌注后维持酸碱平衡方面,碳酸氢盐缓冲溶液不逊于血浆碱液™。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信