The effects of a 6-week sand- vs. Land-based jump training programme on frontal plane knee angle and jump performance in adolescent female football players.
Mark C Richardson, William Evans, Paul Chesterton, Matthew Wright
{"title":"The effects of a 6-week sand- vs. Land-based jump training programme on frontal plane knee angle and jump performance in adolescent female football players.","authors":"Mark C Richardson, William Evans, Paul Chesterton, Matthew Wright","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2465946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our study investigated the effects of a six-week jump-training intervention (sand- vs land- based incorporated in a warmup), on frontal plane knee angle and jump performance of adolescent female football players. Fifty-six females were randomly allocated to either the SAND or LAND group. Thirty-nine females completed the programme twice weekly and were eligible for analysis. Two-dimensional frontal plane projection angle (FPPA), countermovement jump (CMJ) and reactive strength index (RSI) (10-5 repeated jump test) were measured 1-week pre- and post-intervention. Analysis of covariance was used to model post-intervention group differences. Compatibility curves were used to visualise parameter estimates alongside <i>p</i>- values, and surprisal (S) value transforms. Mean difference (<math><mover><mi>X</mi><mo>-</mo></mover></math>) and compatibility intervals (CI) (95|75%) for FPPA for SAND vs. LAND were <math><mover><mi>X</mi><mo>-</mo></mover></math> = 1.29° (-0.11 to 2.69°|0.49 to 2.10°) for the dominant limb, and <math><mover><mi>X</mi><mo>-</mo></mover></math> = 1.80° (0.56 to 3.04°|1.09 to 2.51°)| for the non-dominant limb. Interval estimates for jump performance were imprecise and unclear. The data indicates that including a sand surface within a jump training intervention could be beneficial when aiming to improve knee control in asymptomatic adolescent female football players, with no apparent detriment to jumping performance.<b>Clinical trials registration</b>: The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov prior to study recruitment (NCT04502615).</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"523-535"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2465946","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Our study investigated the effects of a six-week jump-training intervention (sand- vs land- based incorporated in a warmup), on frontal plane knee angle and jump performance of adolescent female football players. Fifty-six females were randomly allocated to either the SAND or LAND group. Thirty-nine females completed the programme twice weekly and were eligible for analysis. Two-dimensional frontal plane projection angle (FPPA), countermovement jump (CMJ) and reactive strength index (RSI) (10-5 repeated jump test) were measured 1-week pre- and post-intervention. Analysis of covariance was used to model post-intervention group differences. Compatibility curves were used to visualise parameter estimates alongside p- values, and surprisal (S) value transforms. Mean difference () and compatibility intervals (CI) (95|75%) for FPPA for SAND vs. LAND were = 1.29° (-0.11 to 2.69°|0.49 to 2.10°) for the dominant limb, and = 1.80° (0.56 to 3.04°|1.09 to 2.51°)| for the non-dominant limb. Interval estimates for jump performance were imprecise and unclear. The data indicates that including a sand surface within a jump training intervention could be beneficial when aiming to improve knee control in asymptomatic adolescent female football players, with no apparent detriment to jumping performance.Clinical trials registration: The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov prior to study recruitment (NCT04502615).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.