A Comparison of SIEA/SCIA and DIEP Flaps for Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sydney Somers, Brittany Foley, Aaron Dadzie, Chase Hart, Joanna Chen, Catie Bautista, Kaylee Scott, Devin Eddington, Jayant P Agarwal, Alvin C Kwok
{"title":"A Comparison of SIEA/SCIA and DIEP Flaps for Autologous Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Sydney Somers, Brittany Foley, Aaron Dadzie, Chase Hart, Joanna Chen, Catie Bautista, Kaylee Scott, Devin Eddington, Jayant P Agarwal, Alvin C Kwok","doi":"10.1055/a-2540-0987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. Less commonly used abdominal flaps include the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and the superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIA) flaps which are based on the superficial vasculature of the abdominal wall. We sought to compare complication rates between DIEP and superficial system flaps and their associated risk factors. Methods A retrospective chart review of 400 breast cancer patients undergoing abdominally-based free flap breast reconstruction with either a DIEP or superficial flap from January 2017 to December 2023 was performed at a single institution. The primary outcome was breast and abdominal site complications. Results A total of 638 flaps, 571 (89.4%) DIEP and 67 (10.5%) superficial, were performed with flap complication rates of 27.3% and 22.4% respectively. At the recipient site, there was a significant difference in the rate of postoperative thrombosis (0.7% vs. 4.5%, p=0.015); however, there were no differences for flap failure (0.4% vs. 1.5%, p=0.28) or other flap complications. Donor site outcomes were similar between groups. Although not statistically significant, abdominal bulging was seen in 18 DIEP flap patients compared to none observed in the superficial flap patients (p=0.24). When controlling for age, BMI, and radiation history, the overall rate of superficial flap and abdominal complications was not statistically significant from the rate of DIEP flap complications (p=0.576). Conclusion Compared to DIEP flaps, superficial flaps had significantly higher rates of immediate perioperative thrombosis. However, there were no significant differences in rates of flap failure or other flap complications with superficial flaps compared to DIEP flaps. There was a clinically significant trend toward increased abdominal bulging with the use of DIEP flaps. Our results will help surgeons better understand the risks and benefits associated with superficial flaps for autologous breast reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2540-0987","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. Less commonly used abdominal flaps include the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and the superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIA) flaps which are based on the superficial vasculature of the abdominal wall. We sought to compare complication rates between DIEP and superficial system flaps and their associated risk factors. Methods A retrospective chart review of 400 breast cancer patients undergoing abdominally-based free flap breast reconstruction with either a DIEP or superficial flap from January 2017 to December 2023 was performed at a single institution. The primary outcome was breast and abdominal site complications. Results A total of 638 flaps, 571 (89.4%) DIEP and 67 (10.5%) superficial, were performed with flap complication rates of 27.3% and 22.4% respectively. At the recipient site, there was a significant difference in the rate of postoperative thrombosis (0.7% vs. 4.5%, p=0.015); however, there were no differences for flap failure (0.4% vs. 1.5%, p=0.28) or other flap complications. Donor site outcomes were similar between groups. Although not statistically significant, abdominal bulging was seen in 18 DIEP flap patients compared to none observed in the superficial flap patients (p=0.24). When controlling for age, BMI, and radiation history, the overall rate of superficial flap and abdominal complications was not statistically significant from the rate of DIEP flap complications (p=0.576). Conclusion Compared to DIEP flaps, superficial flaps had significantly higher rates of immediate perioperative thrombosis. However, there were no significant differences in rates of flap failure or other flap complications with superficial flaps compared to DIEP flaps. There was a clinically significant trend toward increased abdominal bulging with the use of DIEP flaps. Our results will help surgeons better understand the risks and benefits associated with superficial flaps for autologous breast reconstruction.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信