Predictors of early disability accumulation in newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis: clinical, imaging and cerebrospinal fluid measures.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Markus Lauerer, Tun Wiltgen, Carolin Brückner, Christina Engl, Katrin Giglhuber, Sebastian Lambrecht, Viola Pongratz, Achim Berthele, Christiane Gasperi, Jan S Kirschke, Claus Zimmer, Bernhard Hemmer, Mark Mühlau
{"title":"Predictors of early disability accumulation in newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis: clinical, imaging and cerebrospinal fluid measures.","authors":"Markus Lauerer, Tun Wiltgen, Carolin Brückner, Christina Engl, Katrin Giglhuber, Sebastian Lambrecht, Viola Pongratz, Achim Berthele, Christiane Gasperi, Jan S Kirschke, Claus Zimmer, Bernhard Hemmer, Mark Mühlau","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2024-335037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A growing arsenal of treatment options for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) emphasises the need for early prognostic biomarkers. While evidence for individual markers exists, comprehensive analyses at the time of diagnosis are sparse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Brain and spinal cord lesion numbers, cerebrospinal fluid parameters, initial symptoms, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score were determined at the time of diagnosis. Confirmed disability accumulation (CDA), defined as a sustained EDSS increase over 6 months, was determined during a 5-year follow-up. All-subsets multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of CDA. Model performance was assessed via receiver operating characteristic analysis, and individual risks were calculated. Analyses were repeated with progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) as an outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>113/417 (27.1%) people with RMS experienced CDA on follow-up. Intrathecal IgG synthesis, a higher number of spinal cord lesions, age and polysymptomatic manifestation were identified as independent predictors of CDA. The resulting prediction model yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 with a 95% CI of 0.70 to 0.80. Individuals exceeding the optimal thresholds for the three most significant predictors had a 61.8% likelihood of experiencing CDA, whereas those below all three thresholds had a CDA rate of 4.5%. The only significant baseline predictor differentiating PIRA from relapse-associated worsening was a higher number of spinal cord lesions (AUC=0.64, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intrathecal IgG synthesis, spinal cord lesion number, age and polysymptomatic manifestation are independent predictors of early CDA in newly diagnosed RMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-335037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A growing arsenal of treatment options for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) emphasises the need for early prognostic biomarkers. While evidence for individual markers exists, comprehensive analyses at the time of diagnosis are sparse.

Methods: Brain and spinal cord lesion numbers, cerebrospinal fluid parameters, initial symptoms, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score were determined at the time of diagnosis. Confirmed disability accumulation (CDA), defined as a sustained EDSS increase over 6 months, was determined during a 5-year follow-up. All-subsets multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of CDA. Model performance was assessed via receiver operating characteristic analysis, and individual risks were calculated. Analyses were repeated with progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) as an outcome.

Results: 113/417 (27.1%) people with RMS experienced CDA on follow-up. Intrathecal IgG synthesis, a higher number of spinal cord lesions, age and polysymptomatic manifestation were identified as independent predictors of CDA. The resulting prediction model yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 with a 95% CI of 0.70 to 0.80. Individuals exceeding the optimal thresholds for the three most significant predictors had a 61.8% likelihood of experiencing CDA, whereas those below all three thresholds had a CDA rate of 4.5%. The only significant baseline predictor differentiating PIRA from relapse-associated worsening was a higher number of spinal cord lesions (AUC=0.64, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.74).

Conclusions: Intrathecal IgG synthesis, spinal cord lesion number, age and polysymptomatic manifestation are independent predictors of early CDA in newly diagnosed RMS.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
888
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (JNNP) aspires to publish groundbreaking and cutting-edge research worldwide. Covering the entire spectrum of neurological sciences, the journal focuses on common disorders like stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, peripheral neuropathy, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and neuropsychiatry, while also addressing complex challenges such as ALS. With early online publication, regular podcasts, and an extensive archive collection boasting the longest half-life in clinical neuroscience journals, JNNP aims to be a trailblazer in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信