Whole-brain BOLD responses to graded hypoxic challenges at 7 T, 9.4 T, and 15.2 T: Implications for ultrahigh-field functional MRI and BOLD-dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Thuy Thi Le, Sang Han Choi, Geun Ho Im, Chanhee Lee, Dongkyu Lee, Jacob Schulman, HyungJoon Cho, Kamil Uludağ, Seong-Gi Kim
{"title":"Whole-brain BOLD responses to graded hypoxic challenges at 7 T, 9.4 T, and 15.2 T: Implications for ultrahigh-field functional MRI and BOLD-dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.","authors":"Thuy Thi Le, Sang Han Choi, Geun Ho Im, Chanhee Lee, Dongkyu Lee, Jacob Schulman, HyungJoon Cho, Kamil Uludağ, Seong-Gi Kim","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) functional MRI signals depend on changes in deoxyhemoglobin content, which is associated with baseline cerebral blood volume (CBV) and blood oxygen saturation change. To accurately interpret activation-induced BOLD responses and quantify perfusion values by BOLD dynamic susceptibility contrast (BOLD-DSC) with transient hypoxia, it is critical to assess Δ <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mo>*</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{R}}_2^{\\ast } $$</annotation></semantics> </math> values in tissue and blood across varying levels of hypoxia and magnetic field strengths (B<sub>0</sub>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Whole-brain BOLD responses were examined using 5-s graded hypoxic challenges with 10%, 5%, and 0% O<sub>2</sub> at ultrahigh field strengths of 7 T, 9.4 T, and 15.2 T. Both tissue and blood responses were analyzed for BOLD-DSC quantification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial heterogeneity in hypoxia-induced Δ <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mo>*</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{R}}_2^{\\ast } $$</annotation></semantics> </math> was observed among regions under different hypoxic doses and B<sub>0</sub>. Nonlinear Δ <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mo>*</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{R}}_2^{\\ast } $$</annotation></semantics> </math> responses with increasing field strength were observed, depending on hypoxic levels: 10% O<sub>2</sub> condition exhibited pronounced supralinear trends, whereas 0% and 5% O<sub>2</sub> conditions showed nearly linear dependencies. Blood arterial and venous <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup><mrow><mo>∆</mo> <mi>R</mi></mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mo>*</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\Delta {\\mathrm{R}}_2^{\\ast } $$</annotation></semantics> </math> responses showed a similar dependence as tissue. However, at 15.2 T, the venous signal saturated under 5% and 0% O<sub>2</sub> conditions. Quantitative CBV values obtained from BOLD-DSC data showed dependency on susceptibility effects, and higher B<sub>0</sub> and hypoxic severity resulted in slightly higher CBV, indicating that caution is needed when comparing quantitative CBV values derived from different experimental protocols. Normalizing regional CBV values to those of white matter effectively reduced the impact of varying susceptibility contrasts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our investigations provide biophysical insights into the BOLD contrast mechanism at ultrahigh fields, and address quantification issues in susceptibility-based CBV measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30459","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) functional MRI signals depend on changes in deoxyhemoglobin content, which is associated with baseline cerebral blood volume (CBV) and blood oxygen saturation change. To accurately interpret activation-induced BOLD responses and quantify perfusion values by BOLD dynamic susceptibility contrast (BOLD-DSC) with transient hypoxia, it is critical to assess Δ R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ values in tissue and blood across varying levels of hypoxia and magnetic field strengths (B0).

Methods: Whole-brain BOLD responses were examined using 5-s graded hypoxic challenges with 10%, 5%, and 0% O2 at ultrahigh field strengths of 7 T, 9.4 T, and 15.2 T. Both tissue and blood responses were analyzed for BOLD-DSC quantification.

Results: Substantial heterogeneity in hypoxia-induced Δ R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ was observed among regions under different hypoxic doses and B0. Nonlinear Δ R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ responses with increasing field strength were observed, depending on hypoxic levels: 10% O2 condition exhibited pronounced supralinear trends, whereas 0% and 5% O2 conditions showed nearly linear dependencies. Blood arterial and venous R 2 * $$ \Delta {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ responses showed a similar dependence as tissue. However, at 15.2 T, the venous signal saturated under 5% and 0% O2 conditions. Quantitative CBV values obtained from BOLD-DSC data showed dependency on susceptibility effects, and higher B0 and hypoxic severity resulted in slightly higher CBV, indicating that caution is needed when comparing quantitative CBV values derived from different experimental protocols. Normalizing regional CBV values to those of white matter effectively reduced the impact of varying susceptibility contrasts.

Conclusions: Our investigations provide biophysical insights into the BOLD contrast mechanism at ultrahigh fields, and address quantification issues in susceptibility-based CBV measurements.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信