Predicting PTSD development with early post-trauma assessments: a proof-of-concept for a concise tree-based classification method.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Chia-Hao Shih, Elyssa Charlotte Feuer, Ben Kurzion, Kevin Xu, Hong Xie, Stephen R Grider, Xin Wang
{"title":"Predicting PTSD development with early post-trauma assessments: a proof-of-concept for a concise tree-based classification method.","authors":"Chia-Hao Shih, Elyssa Charlotte Feuer, Ben Kurzion, Kevin Xu, Hong Xie, Stephen R Grider, Xin Wang","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2458365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Approximately 70% of individuals globally experience at least one traumatic event in their lifetimes, potentially leading to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Understanding the development of PTSD and devising effective prevention and treatment strategies are crucial. This proof-of-concept study aimed to design a concise tree-based adaptive test using the Classification and Regression Trees (CART) framework to predict PTSD development.<b>Methods:</b> Utilizing data from a longitudinal neuroimaging study, adult trauma survivors were enrolled from local hospital emergency departments within 48 h of experiencing trauma. Participants who completed psychological evaluations within 2 weeks post-trauma and a PTSD diagnosis assessment at 3 months were included in the analytic sample (<i>n</i> = 143). A total of 131 features including demographic, trauma-related, and behavioural and clinical symptoms were collected during this initial two-week post-trauma period. The performance of the CART model was benchmarked against two of the most powerful and widely used machine learning algorithms in the field, Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting (GB) models.<b>Results:</b> The CART model, which incorporates just three critical questions from established assessments, predicted PTSD development with performance closely matched to that of the RF and GB models. The CART model achieved an accuracy of 0.641 and an AUC of 0.663, which showed only slightly worse performance compared to the RF and GB models. Its efficiency in utilizing a minimal set of questions for prediction highlights its potential for practical application in early PTSD detection and intervention strategies.<b>Conclusion:</b> The CART framework demonstrates a streamlined and efficient method for predicting PTSD onset in trauma survivors. While showing promise for practical application, further validation and refinement are necessary to enhance its predictive performance and establish its broader utility in early intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2458365"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2458365","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Approximately 70% of individuals globally experience at least one traumatic event in their lifetimes, potentially leading to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Understanding the development of PTSD and devising effective prevention and treatment strategies are crucial. This proof-of-concept study aimed to design a concise tree-based adaptive test using the Classification and Regression Trees (CART) framework to predict PTSD development.Methods: Utilizing data from a longitudinal neuroimaging study, adult trauma survivors were enrolled from local hospital emergency departments within 48 h of experiencing trauma. Participants who completed psychological evaluations within 2 weeks post-trauma and a PTSD diagnosis assessment at 3 months were included in the analytic sample (n = 143). A total of 131 features including demographic, trauma-related, and behavioural and clinical symptoms were collected during this initial two-week post-trauma period. The performance of the CART model was benchmarked against two of the most powerful and widely used machine learning algorithms in the field, Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting (GB) models.Results: The CART model, which incorporates just three critical questions from established assessments, predicted PTSD development with performance closely matched to that of the RF and GB models. The CART model achieved an accuracy of 0.641 and an AUC of 0.663, which showed only slightly worse performance compared to the RF and GB models. Its efficiency in utilizing a minimal set of questions for prediction highlights its potential for practical application in early PTSD detection and intervention strategies.Conclusion: The CART framework demonstrates a streamlined and efficient method for predicting PTSD onset in trauma survivors. While showing promise for practical application, further validation and refinement are necessary to enhance its predictive performance and establish its broader utility in early intervention strategies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信