Application of transcriptomics concentration-response modeling for prioritization of contaminants detected in tributaries of the North American Great Lakes.

IF 3.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jenna E Cavallin, Kendra Bush, Steve Corsi, Laura DeCicco, Kevin Flynn, Alex Kasparek, Monique Hazemi, Erin Maloney, Peter Schumann, Daniel L Villeneuve
{"title":"Application of transcriptomics concentration-response modeling for prioritization of contaminants detected in tributaries of the North American Great Lakes.","authors":"Jenna E Cavallin, Kendra Bush, Steve Corsi, Laura DeCicco, Kevin Flynn, Alex Kasparek, Monique Hazemi, Erin Maloney, Peter Schumann, Daniel L Villeneuve","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As part of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, chemical monitoring and surveillance efforts have detected approximately 330 chemicals in surface water of Great Lakes tributaries. There were 140 chemicals for which no empirical toxicity data were available. The aim of this study was to generate transcriptomic points of departure (tPODs) for 10 of these compounds and demonstrate how they could be applied in a screening-level prioritization. Organisms representing three trophic levels of the aquatic food web (Pimephales promelas, Daphnia magna, and Raphidocelis subcapitata) were exposed for 24 hr to a half-log dilution series of nominal exposure concentrations typically ranging from 66.7-0.021 µM of each chemical. In addition to observations of apical effects (e.g., survival and morphology), whole body transcriptomic responses (tPODs) to each chemical were evaluated with targeted analysis using TempO-seq for P. promelas and D. magna and nontargeted RNA-seq for R. subcapitata. The tPODs ranged from 0.18-10.8 µM for P. promelas and 0.32-29 µM for D. magna, with the most potent of the chemicals tested being fipronil carboxamide for both species. For R. subcapitata, the tPODs ranged from 0.04-1.77 µM, with gabapentin as the most potent chemical tested. Empirically derived tPODs from these data-poor chemicals were compared with concentrations detected in the Great Lakes basin. Environmental concentrations were less than the tPODs except for R. subcapitata and 3,4-dichlorophenyl isocyanate. Similarly, tPODs from previously tested data-rich chemicals were compared with environmental concentrations, in which case tPODs from several chemicals overlapped environmental concentrations. This work demonstrates the potential utility of emerging ecological high-throughput transcriptomics assays to support screening and prioritization of data-poor environmental contaminants.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1310-1321"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As part of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, chemical monitoring and surveillance efforts have detected approximately 330 chemicals in surface water of Great Lakes tributaries. There were 140 chemicals for which no empirical toxicity data were available. The aim of this study was to generate transcriptomic points of departure (tPODs) for 10 of these compounds and demonstrate how they could be applied in a screening-level prioritization. Organisms representing three trophic levels of the aquatic food web (Pimephales promelas, Daphnia magna, and Raphidocelis subcapitata) were exposed for 24 hr to a half-log dilution series of nominal exposure concentrations typically ranging from 66.7-0.021 µM of each chemical. In addition to observations of apical effects (e.g., survival and morphology), whole body transcriptomic responses (tPODs) to each chemical were evaluated with targeted analysis using TempO-seq for P. promelas and D. magna and nontargeted RNA-seq for R. subcapitata. The tPODs ranged from 0.18-10.8 µM for P. promelas and 0.32-29 µM for D. magna, with the most potent of the chemicals tested being fipronil carboxamide for both species. For R. subcapitata, the tPODs ranged from 0.04-1.77 µM, with gabapentin as the most potent chemical tested. Empirically derived tPODs from these data-poor chemicals were compared with concentrations detected in the Great Lakes basin. Environmental concentrations were less than the tPODs except for R. subcapitata and 3,4-dichlorophenyl isocyanate. Similarly, tPODs from previously tested data-rich chemicals were compared with environmental concentrations, in which case tPODs from several chemicals overlapped environmental concentrations. This work demonstrates the potential utility of emerging ecological high-throughput transcriptomics assays to support screening and prioritization of data-poor environmental contaminants.

转录组学浓度响应模型在北美五大湖支流中检测到的污染物优先级的应用。
作为“五大湖恢复倡议”的一部分,化学监测和监测工作已在五大湖支流的地表水中发现了约330种化学物质。有140种化学品没有经验毒性数据。本研究的目的是生成10个这些化合物的转录组起始点(tpod),并展示它们如何应用于筛选级别的优先级。代表水生食物网三个营养水平的生物(P. promelas, D. magna和R. subcapitata)暴露于1 / 2倍稀释系列中24小时,名义暴露浓度通常为66.7至0.021 μ M每种化学品。除了观察根尖效应(如生存和形态学)外,还使用TempO-seq对P. promelas和D. magna进行了靶向分析,使用非靶向RNA-seq对R. subcapitata进行了非靶向RNA-seq分析,评估了每种化学物质的全身转录组反应(tpod)。P. promelas的tpod值为0.18 ~ 10.8µM, D. magna的tpod值为0.32 ~ 29µM,其中对这两个物种最有效的化学物质是氟虫腈羧酰胺。小头田鼠的tpod值为0.04 ~ 1.77µM,其中加巴喷丁的作用最强。从这些缺乏数据的化学物质中凭经验得出的tpod与在五大湖盆地中检测到的浓度进行了比较。环境浓度均低于tpod,除小头田鼠和3,4-二氯苯异氰酸酯外。同样,将先前测试的数据丰富的化学品的tpod与环境浓度进行比较,在这种情况下,来自几种化学品的tpod重叠了环境浓度。这项工作证明了新兴生态高通量转录组学分析的潜在效用,以支持数据贫乏的环境污染物的筛选和优先排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信