Early Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Initiation May Improve Outcomes in Select Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension: An Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Benjamin Smood, Charles R Vasquez, Salim E Olia, Jason J Han, Amit Iyengar, William L Patrick, Mark R Helmers, John J Kelly, Thomas Richards, Asad Usman, Edward Cantu, Koji Takeda, Nathaniel Langer, Marisa Cevasco
{"title":"Early Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Initiation May Improve Outcomes in Select Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension: An Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Analysis.","authors":"Benjamin Smood, Charles R Vasquez, Salim E Olia, Jason J Han, Amit Iyengar, William L Patrick, Mark R Helmers, John J Kelly, Thomas Richards, Asad Usman, Edward Cantu, Koji Takeda, Nathaniel Langer, Marisa Cevasco","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization for primary pulmonary hypertension (PPHTN) remains controversial. This multicenter, retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry evaluated 221 PPHTN patients placed on ECMO in 2000-2019. Survival by ECMO indications and cannulation strategies were compared with Kaplan-Meier analyses. ECMO mortality risk factors were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regressions. The overall rate of survival to ECMO decannulation was 140/221 (63.3%), of which 112/140 (80.0%) survived to hospital discharge. Survival to decannulation increased between 2000-2009 (14/30, 46.7%) and 2010-2019 (126/191, 66.0%, p = 0.041) alongside survival to hospital discharge (9/30, 30.0% vs. 103/191, 53.9%, p = 0.015). Survival to decannulation was similar when patients were supported with either venovenous-ECMO (VV-ECMO; 39/54, 72.2%) or venoarterial-ECMO (VA-ECMO) for respiratory failure (43/71, 60.6%, p = 0.174), although VV-ECMO was associated with fewer complications (25/54, 46% vs. 25/71, 35%, respectively, p = 0.039) and increased survival to hospital discharge (34/54, 63.0% vs. 33/71, 46.5%, p = 0.067). The strongest independent predictor of ECMO morality was isolated vasopressor use before cannulation (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.37 [95% confidence interval {CI95%}: 1.16-9.81], p = 0.026). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation mortality risk was lower among patients bridged-to-transplantation (HR: 0.37 [CI95%: 0.14-0.97], p = 0.043), and was inversely correlated with pre-ECMO pH (HR: 0.03 [CI95%: 0.00-0.49], p = 0.013). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use for PPHTN has grown alongside improved outcomes. Early ECMO initiation may improve outcomes in select individuals with PPHTN.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002390","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization for primary pulmonary hypertension (PPHTN) remains controversial. This multicenter, retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry evaluated 221 PPHTN patients placed on ECMO in 2000-2019. Survival by ECMO indications and cannulation strategies were compared with Kaplan-Meier analyses. ECMO mortality risk factors were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regressions. The overall rate of survival to ECMO decannulation was 140/221 (63.3%), of which 112/140 (80.0%) survived to hospital discharge. Survival to decannulation increased between 2000-2009 (14/30, 46.7%) and 2010-2019 (126/191, 66.0%, p = 0.041) alongside survival to hospital discharge (9/30, 30.0% vs. 103/191, 53.9%, p = 0.015). Survival to decannulation was similar when patients were supported with either venovenous-ECMO (VV-ECMO; 39/54, 72.2%) or venoarterial-ECMO (VA-ECMO) for respiratory failure (43/71, 60.6%, p = 0.174), although VV-ECMO was associated with fewer complications (25/54, 46% vs. 25/71, 35%, respectively, p = 0.039) and increased survival to hospital discharge (34/54, 63.0% vs. 33/71, 46.5%, p = 0.067). The strongest independent predictor of ECMO morality was isolated vasopressor use before cannulation (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.37 [95% confidence interval {CI95%}: 1.16-9.81], p = 0.026). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation mortality risk was lower among patients bridged-to-transplantation (HR: 0.37 [CI95%: 0.14-0.97], p = 0.043), and was inversely correlated with pre-ECMO pH (HR: 0.03 [CI95%: 0.00-0.49], p = 0.013). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use for PPHTN has grown alongside improved outcomes. Early ECMO initiation may improve outcomes in select individuals with PPHTN.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信