Evaluation of Surface Disinfection Efficiency of Vinegar and Asafoetida.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Malik Itrat, Tariq Nadeem Khan, Shariq Shamsi
{"title":"Evaluation of Surface Disinfection Efficiency of Vinegar and Asafoetida.","authors":"Malik Itrat, Tariq Nadeem Khan, Shariq Shamsi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contaminated surfaces play a crucial role in transmitting infectious diseases. Effective surface disinfection is essential for interrupting disease transmission by eliminating pathogens on these surfaces. While traditional chemical disinfectants are effective, they pose significant health and environmental concerns, prompting the search for natural alternatives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of vinegar and asafoetida solution in surface disinfection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The swab test was conducted on 10 different surfaces, including rough and smooth surfaces, contaminated with organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus niger. Samples were collected before and after applying the test solution. Additionally, a real-settings swab test was performed on 20 sites with diverse textures within hospital and workplace settings to assess the practical applicability of the test solution in reducing microbial contamination.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted in laboratory settings, followed by real-world application in hospital and workplace environments.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The test solution, composed of vinegar and asafoetida, was applied to contaminated surfaces to assess its disinfection efficacy. Positive controls included 1% sodium hypochlorite and 5% phenol, while distilled water served as the negative control.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measure: </strong>The primary outcome was the reduction in microbial colony counts after the application of the test solution, quantified through swab samples before and after disinfection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant reductions in microbial colonies were observed across all tested surfaces following the application of the test solutions, with complete elimination achieved on many surfaces. Percent reductions in microbial colonies ranged from 50% to 100%, and log reductions varied from 0.2 to undefined i.e., complete reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The test solution effectively reduced microbial loads on smooth and rough surfaces, demonstrating its potential as a natural disinfectant. However, its long-term residual activity and efficacy against viral strains were not evaluated. Therefore, future research should address these gaps to optimize the application of the solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":" ","pages":"110-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contaminated surfaces play a crucial role in transmitting infectious diseases. Effective surface disinfection is essential for interrupting disease transmission by eliminating pathogens on these surfaces. While traditional chemical disinfectants are effective, they pose significant health and environmental concerns, prompting the search for natural alternatives.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of vinegar and asafoetida solution in surface disinfection.

Methods: The swab test was conducted on 10 different surfaces, including rough and smooth surfaces, contaminated with organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus niger. Samples were collected before and after applying the test solution. Additionally, a real-settings swab test was performed on 20 sites with diverse textures within hospital and workplace settings to assess the practical applicability of the test solution in reducing microbial contamination.

Setting: The study was conducted in laboratory settings, followed by real-world application in hospital and workplace environments.

Intervention: The test solution, composed of vinegar and asafoetida, was applied to contaminated surfaces to assess its disinfection efficacy. Positive controls included 1% sodium hypochlorite and 5% phenol, while distilled water served as the negative control.

Primary outcome measure: The primary outcome was the reduction in microbial colony counts after the application of the test solution, quantified through swab samples before and after disinfection.

Results: Significant reductions in microbial colonies were observed across all tested surfaces following the application of the test solutions, with complete elimination achieved on many surfaces. Percent reductions in microbial colonies ranged from 50% to 100%, and log reductions varied from 0.2 to undefined i.e., complete reduction.

Conclusion: The test solution effectively reduced microbial loads on smooth and rough surfaces, demonstrating its potential as a natural disinfectant. However, its long-term residual activity and efficacy against viral strains were not evaluated. Therefore, future research should address these gaps to optimize the application of the solution.

醋和刺尾草表面消毒效果评价。
背景:被污染的表面在传染病传播中起着至关重要的作用。通过消除这些表面的病原体,有效的表面消毒对于阻断疾病传播至关重要。虽然传统的化学消毒剂是有效的,但它们带来了严重的健康和环境问题,促使人们寻找天然替代品。目的:评价醋液和asafetida溶液的表面消毒效果。方法:对金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、蜡样芽孢杆菌、白色念珠菌、黑曲霉等细菌污染的10种不同表面,包括粗糙表面和光滑表面进行拭子试验。应用测试溶液前后分别采集样品。此外,在医院和工作场所设置的20个不同质地的地点进行了实际设置拭子测试,以评估测试溶液在减少微生物污染方面的实际适用性。环境:该研究是在实验室环境中进行的,随后在医院和工作场所环境中进行了实际应用。干预措施:将醋和无尾草组成的试验溶液应用于污染表面,评估其消毒效果。阳性对照为1%次氯酸钠和5%苯酚,阴性对照为蒸馏水。主要结果测量:主要结果是使用试验溶液后微生物菌落计数的减少,通过消毒前后的拭子样本进行量化。结果:在应用测试溶液后,在所有测试表面上观察到微生物菌落的显著减少,在许多表面上完全消除。微生物菌落减少的百分比从50%到100%不等,对数减少从0.2到未定义,即完全减少。结论:试验溶液可有效降低光滑和粗糙表面的微生物负荷,显示了其作为天然消毒剂的潜力。然而,其长期残留活性和对病毒株的效力尚未得到评价。因此,未来的研究应该解决这些差距,以优化解决方案的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信