{"title":"Evaluation of Surface Disinfection Efficiency of Vinegar and Asafoetida.","authors":"Malik Itrat, Tariq Nadeem Khan, Shariq Shamsi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contaminated surfaces play a crucial role in transmitting infectious diseases. Effective surface disinfection is essential for interrupting disease transmission by eliminating pathogens on these surfaces. While traditional chemical disinfectants are effective, they pose significant health and environmental concerns, prompting the search for natural alternatives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of vinegar and asafoetida solution in surface disinfection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The swab test was conducted on 10 different surfaces, including rough and smooth surfaces, contaminated with organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus niger. Samples were collected before and after applying the test solution. Additionally, a real-settings swab test was performed on 20 sites with diverse textures within hospital and workplace settings to assess the practical applicability of the test solution in reducing microbial contamination.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted in laboratory settings, followed by real-world application in hospital and workplace environments.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The test solution, composed of vinegar and asafoetida, was applied to contaminated surfaces to assess its disinfection efficacy. Positive controls included 1% sodium hypochlorite and 5% phenol, while distilled water served as the negative control.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measure: </strong>The primary outcome was the reduction in microbial colony counts after the application of the test solution, quantified through swab samples before and after disinfection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant reductions in microbial colonies were observed across all tested surfaces following the application of the test solutions, with complete elimination achieved on many surfaces. Percent reductions in microbial colonies ranged from 50% to 100%, and log reductions varied from 0.2 to undefined i.e., complete reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The test solution effectively reduced microbial loads on smooth and rough surfaces, demonstrating its potential as a natural disinfectant. However, its long-term residual activity and efficacy against viral strains were not evaluated. Therefore, future research should address these gaps to optimize the application of the solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":" ","pages":"110-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Contaminated surfaces play a crucial role in transmitting infectious diseases. Effective surface disinfection is essential for interrupting disease transmission by eliminating pathogens on these surfaces. While traditional chemical disinfectants are effective, they pose significant health and environmental concerns, prompting the search for natural alternatives.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of vinegar and asafoetida solution in surface disinfection.
Methods: The swab test was conducted on 10 different surfaces, including rough and smooth surfaces, contaminated with organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus niger. Samples were collected before and after applying the test solution. Additionally, a real-settings swab test was performed on 20 sites with diverse textures within hospital and workplace settings to assess the practical applicability of the test solution in reducing microbial contamination.
Setting: The study was conducted in laboratory settings, followed by real-world application in hospital and workplace environments.
Intervention: The test solution, composed of vinegar and asafoetida, was applied to contaminated surfaces to assess its disinfection efficacy. Positive controls included 1% sodium hypochlorite and 5% phenol, while distilled water served as the negative control.
Primary outcome measure: The primary outcome was the reduction in microbial colony counts after the application of the test solution, quantified through swab samples before and after disinfection.
Results: Significant reductions in microbial colonies were observed across all tested surfaces following the application of the test solutions, with complete elimination achieved on many surfaces. Percent reductions in microbial colonies ranged from 50% to 100%, and log reductions varied from 0.2 to undefined i.e., complete reduction.
Conclusion: The test solution effectively reduced microbial loads on smooth and rough surfaces, demonstrating its potential as a natural disinfectant. However, its long-term residual activity and efficacy against viral strains were not evaluated. Therefore, future research should address these gaps to optimize the application of the solution.
期刊介绍:
Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field.
Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.