Motor Function and Safety of Nusinersen and Risdiplam in Asian Patients with Types 2-4 Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.4 3区医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL

Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1007/s12325-024-03101-7

Xinran Zhao, Yihan Liao, Jingyu Zhao, Lin Zhu, Jun Liu, Min Zhang, Wei Li

{"title":"Motor Function and Safety of Nusinersen and Risdiplam in Asian Patients with Types 2-4 Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xinran Zhao, Yihan Liao, Jingyu Zhao, Lin Zhu, Jun Liu, Min Zhang, Wei Li","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03101-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study was to systematically appraise and synthesize real-world data of motor function and safety in Asian patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) treated with nusinersen or risdiplam.Methods: This study systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang databases for real-world studies (RWS) published from January 2017 to January 2024. Based on the prespecified study selection and eligibility criteria, RWS evaluating motor function and/or safety outcomes in patients with types 2-4 SMA treated with nusinersen or risdiplam were included, while studies without Asian populations were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias, and a meta-analysis was conducted for each motor function endpoint based on the extracted data.Results: A total of 26 RWS were included in this review, of which 17 reporting main motor function outcomes were included in the meta-analyses. Intervention in all 17 studies was nusinersen; none included risdiplam. Statistically significant improvement was observed in Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) [Mean difference (MD) = 2.27 (0.84, 3.71)], Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) [MD = 2.62 (1.79, 3.45)] and six-minute walk test (6MWT) [MD = 18.29 (9.12, 27.45)] when treated with nusinersen ≤ 6 months and > 6 months (HFMSE [MD = 4.34 (3.54, 5.14)]; 6MWT [MD = 45.59 (12.92, 78.27)]). Clinically meaningful responses of motor milestones were also observed when treating nusinersen over 6 months: 54.4% (0.305, 0.772) for RULM, 53.0% (0.273, 0.779) for HFMSE and 97.1% (0.819, 1.000) for 6MWT. A total of 19 studies addressed safety outcomes. Reported adverse events were consistent with the expected safety profile for nusinersen.Conclusion: Our study suggests that nusinersen is associated with a statistically significant and clinically meaningful motor function improvement in Asian patients with types 2-4 SMA in the real-world setting. No unexpected safety concern was observed for nusinersen. Motor function and safety outcomes after risdiplam could not be evaluated in this patient population under real-world settings due to limited studies.","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-03101-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to systematically appraise and synthesize real-world data of motor function and safety in Asian patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) treated with nusinersen or risdiplam.

Methods: This study systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang databases for real-world studies (RWS) published from January 2017 to January 2024. Based on the prespecified study selection and eligibility criteria, RWS evaluating motor function and/or safety outcomes in patients with types 2-4 SMA treated with nusinersen or risdiplam were included, while studies without Asian populations were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias, and a meta-analysis was conducted for each motor function endpoint based on the extracted data.

Results: A total of 26 RWS were included in this review, of which 17 reporting main motor function outcomes were included in the meta-analyses. Intervention in all 17 studies was nusinersen; none included risdiplam. Statistically significant improvement was observed in Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) [Mean difference (MD) = 2.27 (0.84, 3.71)], Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) [MD = 2.62 (1.79, 3.45)] and six-minute walk test (6MWT) [MD = 18.29 (9.12, 27.45)] when treated with nusinersen ≤ 6 months and > 6 months (HFMSE [MD = 4.34 (3.54, 5.14)]; 6MWT [MD = 45.59 (12.92, 78.27)]). Clinically meaningful responses of motor milestones were also observed when treating nusinersen over 6 months: 54.4% (0.305, 0.772) for RULM, 53.0% (0.273, 0.779) for HFMSE and 97.1% (0.819, 1.000) for 6MWT. A total of 19 studies addressed safety outcomes. Reported adverse events were consistent with the expected safety profile for nusinersen.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that nusinersen is associated with a statistically significant and clinically meaningful motor function improvement in Asian patients with types 2-4 SMA in the real-world setting. No unexpected safety concern was observed for nusinersen. Motor function and safety outcomes after risdiplam could not be evaluated in this patient population under real-world settings due to limited studies.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Advances in Therapy 医学-药学

CiteScore

7.20

自引率

2.60%

发文量

353

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.