An Appraisal of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in Ethiopia: The Case of Mining Investments in the Benishangul-Gumuz Region

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Netsanet Zeleke Haile, Admassu Tesso Huluka, Amsalu Bedemo Beyene
{"title":"An Appraisal of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in Ethiopia: The Case of Mining Investments in the Benishangul-Gumuz Region","authors":"Netsanet Zeleke Haile,&nbsp;Admassu Tesso Huluka,&nbsp;Amsalu Bedemo Beyene","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02130-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mining policy reforms in Ethiopia have led to increased investments in mineral-rich regions. However, there has been inadequate evaluation of environmental and social impact assessment (ESIA) practices related to these mining projects, particularly in the Benishangul-Gumuz Region (BGR). This study aims to assess the ESIA practices for mining investments in the BGR by examining public participation in the ESIA process, the mechanisms for ESIA implementation and monitoring, and the strategies employed by mining companies for environmental and social mitigation and enhancement plans (ESMEP). Utilizing a cross-sectional research design, we collected primary data from 162 households affected by mining activities through systematic random sampling. Additionally, qualitative data were gathered through four focus group discussions (FGDs) and twelve key informant interviews (KIIs). Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data underwent narrative analysis. The findings indicate low levels of public involvement in land allocation, ESIA processes, and decision-making related to mining investments. Furthermore, weak institutional monitoring has hindered effective implementation of ESMEP by mining companies. Consequently, affected communities face significant risks of adverse social and environmental impacts that threaten their sustainable development. To address these issues, the study recommends that the regional government establish robust institutions for monitoring and evaluating ESIA and ESMEP implementation, thereby ensuring accountability among mining companies and fostering sustainable development within host communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":"75 5","pages":"1099 - 1111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-025-02130-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mining policy reforms in Ethiopia have led to increased investments in mineral-rich regions. However, there has been inadequate evaluation of environmental and social impact assessment (ESIA) practices related to these mining projects, particularly in the Benishangul-Gumuz Region (BGR). This study aims to assess the ESIA practices for mining investments in the BGR by examining public participation in the ESIA process, the mechanisms for ESIA implementation and monitoring, and the strategies employed by mining companies for environmental and social mitigation and enhancement plans (ESMEP). Utilizing a cross-sectional research design, we collected primary data from 162 households affected by mining activities through systematic random sampling. Additionally, qualitative data were gathered through four focus group discussions (FGDs) and twelve key informant interviews (KIIs). Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data underwent narrative analysis. The findings indicate low levels of public involvement in land allocation, ESIA processes, and decision-making related to mining investments. Furthermore, weak institutional monitoring has hindered effective implementation of ESMEP by mining companies. Consequently, affected communities face significant risks of adverse social and environmental impacts that threaten their sustainable development. To address these issues, the study recommends that the regional government establish robust institutions for monitoring and evaluating ESIA and ESMEP implementation, thereby ensuring accountability among mining companies and fostering sustainable development within host communities.

对埃塞俄比亚环境和社会影响评估的评价:以Benishangul-Gumuz地区矿业投资为例。
埃塞俄比亚的矿业政策改革增加了对矿产丰富地区的投资。但是,对与这些采矿项目有关的环境和社会影响评价(ESIA)做法的评价不够,特别是在本尚古尔-古穆兹地区。本研究旨在通过审查公众参与环境影响评估过程、环境影响评估实施和监测机制以及矿业公司为环境和社会缓解和增强计划(ESMEP)所采用的战略,评估BGR中矿业投资的环境影响评估实践。采用横断面研究设计,通过系统随机抽样,收集了162个受采矿活动影响的家庭的原始数据。此外,通过4次焦点小组讨论(fgd)和12次关键信息访谈(KIIs)收集了定性数据。定量资料采用描述性统计分析,定性资料采用叙述性分析。调查结果表明,公众对土地分配、环境影响评估程序和与矿业投资有关的决策的参与程度较低。此外,薄弱的机构监测阻碍了矿业公司有效执行ESMEP。因此,受影响社区面临不利的社会和环境影响的重大风险,威胁到其可持续发展。为了解决这些问题,该研究建议区域政府建立强有力的机构来监测和评价ESIA和ESMEP的执行情况,从而确保矿业公司的问责制和促进东道社区的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信