Reference line lengthening on resting-state magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pelvic organ prolapse seeking surgical treatment

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yoshiyuki Okada, Chie Nakagawa, Ippei Kurokawa, Miwa Shigeta, Yukiko Nomura, Eisuke Inoue, Yasukuni Yoshimura
{"title":"Reference line lengthening on resting-state magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pelvic organ prolapse seeking surgical treatment","authors":"Yoshiyuki Okada,&nbsp;Chie Nakagawa,&nbsp;Ippei Kurokawa,&nbsp;Miwa Shigeta,&nbsp;Yukiko Nomura,&nbsp;Eisuke Inoue,&nbsp;Yasukuni Yoshimura","doi":"10.1111/jog.16248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Injury to and laxity of the pelvic floor muscles are highly important factors in the etiology of pelvic organ prolapse. When women with pelvic organ prolapse perform the Valsalva maneuver, progressive descent and widening of the levator ani muscle are observed on dynamic magnetic resonance images. However, physical examination of such women often reveals pelvic floor laxity, even in a relaxed state. Therefore, we aimed to verify the hypothesis that sagging of the pelvic floor can be detected on resting-state magnetic resonance images in the supine position.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively evaluated resting-state magnetic resonance imaging findings in women with (<i>n</i> = 193; all underwent surgical treatment) and without (controls; <i>n</i> = 193) pelvic organ prolapse who had at least one prior vaginal delivery. We compared the lengths of the pubococcygeal line, H-line, and M-line between the groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median lengths (interquartile ranges) for the prolapse and control groups were 98.3 (91.9–104.0) and 95.1 (90.3–101.4) mm (<i>p</i> = 0.0011), respectively, for the pubococcygeal line; 61.5 (56.0–67.9) and 51.1 (47.2–55.6) mm (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), respectively, for the H-line; and 24.6 (20.4–29.0) and 8.6 (3.9–13.0) mm (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), respectively, for the M-line. Similarly, in the multiple regression analysis adjusted for age, height, body mass index, a history of operative vaginal delivery, and a history of hysterectomy, the pubococcygeal line, H-line, and M-line were significantly longer in the prolapse group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In women with pelvic organ prolapse, the H-line and M-line are significantly longer on resting-state magnetic resonance images, allowing for the detection of pelvic floor relaxation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16248","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Injury to and laxity of the pelvic floor muscles are highly important factors in the etiology of pelvic organ prolapse. When women with pelvic organ prolapse perform the Valsalva maneuver, progressive descent and widening of the levator ani muscle are observed on dynamic magnetic resonance images. However, physical examination of such women often reveals pelvic floor laxity, even in a relaxed state. Therefore, we aimed to verify the hypothesis that sagging of the pelvic floor can be detected on resting-state magnetic resonance images in the supine position.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated resting-state magnetic resonance imaging findings in women with (n = 193; all underwent surgical treatment) and without (controls; n = 193) pelvic organ prolapse who had at least one prior vaginal delivery. We compared the lengths of the pubococcygeal line, H-line, and M-line between the groups.

Results

The median lengths (interquartile ranges) for the prolapse and control groups were 98.3 (91.9–104.0) and 95.1 (90.3–101.4) mm (p = 0.0011), respectively, for the pubococcygeal line; 61.5 (56.0–67.9) and 51.1 (47.2–55.6) mm (p < 0.0001), respectively, for the H-line; and 24.6 (20.4–29.0) and 8.6 (3.9–13.0) mm (p < 0.0001), respectively, for the M-line. Similarly, in the multiple regression analysis adjusted for age, height, body mass index, a history of operative vaginal delivery, and a history of hysterectomy, the pubococcygeal line, H-line, and M-line were significantly longer in the prolapse group.

Conclusions

In women with pelvic organ prolapse, the H-line and M-line are significantly longer on resting-state magnetic resonance images, allowing for the detection of pelvic floor relaxation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信