Combination of Biochar-Based Fertilisers and Reactive Barriers Improved Soil Carbon Storage, Soil Moisture Retention, and Crop Yield in Short Term

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Negar Omidvar, Stephen Joseph, Lakmini Dissanayake, Michael B. Farrar, Frédérique Reverchon, Russell Burnett, Mehran Rezaei Rashti, Apsara Amarasinghe, Sara Tahery, Zhihong Xu, Wendy Timms, Brittany Elliott, Hongdou Liu, Shahla Hosseini Bai
{"title":"Combination of Biochar-Based Fertilisers and Reactive Barriers Improved Soil Carbon Storage, Soil Moisture Retention, and Crop Yield in Short Term","authors":"Negar Omidvar,&nbsp;Stephen Joseph,&nbsp;Lakmini Dissanayake,&nbsp;Michael B. Farrar,&nbsp;Frédérique Reverchon,&nbsp;Russell Burnett,&nbsp;Mehran Rezaei Rashti,&nbsp;Apsara Amarasinghe,&nbsp;Sara Tahery,&nbsp;Zhihong Xu,&nbsp;Wendy Timms,&nbsp;Brittany Elliott,&nbsp;Hongdou Liu,&nbsp;Shahla Hosseini Bai","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate change threatens long-term soil health because of increased severity and frequency of drought periods. Applying biochar to soils before a drought can increase non-biochar soil carbon (C) and water storage over the long term and sustain crop yield. However, the on-farm benefit of buried solid biochar and applied liquid biochar at low rates remains uncertain. This study examined the effects of two novel biochar-based soil amendments on soil C, water storage and crop yield. The biochar-based amendments included a biochar reactive barrier (RB) made by layering wood-based biochar, straw mulch and cow manure into a series of open surface trenches, and a liquid biochar mineral complex (BMC) applied twice, at low rate (200 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) to one side of RB (fertilised area), while the other side of RB received no treatments (non-fertilised area). Moisture concentration within the RB ranged from 6.76% up to 56.68% after large rainfall, more than double the surrounding soils and gradually started migrating from the RB outwards. Soil within 50 cm distance of the RB showed a 24.5% increase in non-biochar soil C compared with soil at 600 cm distance of the RB, 2.54% versus 2.04%, respectively, in the non-fertilised area, which was supported with lowering soil microbial activity. Pasture yield increase was associated with liquid BMC fertiliser rather than proximity to the RB. Pasture yield was 44% higher in the fertilised area compared with the non-fertilised area 27.89 t ha<sup>−1</sup> versus 19.31 t ha<sup>−1</sup>. Approximately 158 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e was removed from the atmosphere for each cubic meter of RB and an annual removal of 150 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>−1</sup> was estimated by liquid BMC application. Income earned by increased yield was still profitable even though applied liquid BMC could cost between USD 400–520 ha<sup>−1</sup> including shipping costs. Overall, our study suggested biochar-based RB and BMC fertilisers can effectively increase soil moisture retention while building non-biochar soil C storage in the surrounding soil. The adoption of biochar-based techniques has the potential to improve drought resilience while increasing soil C in wide range of non-irrigated cropping systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change threatens long-term soil health because of increased severity and frequency of drought periods. Applying biochar to soils before a drought can increase non-biochar soil carbon (C) and water storage over the long term and sustain crop yield. However, the on-farm benefit of buried solid biochar and applied liquid biochar at low rates remains uncertain. This study examined the effects of two novel biochar-based soil amendments on soil C, water storage and crop yield. The biochar-based amendments included a biochar reactive barrier (RB) made by layering wood-based biochar, straw mulch and cow manure into a series of open surface trenches, and a liquid biochar mineral complex (BMC) applied twice, at low rate (200 kg ha−1) to one side of RB (fertilised area), while the other side of RB received no treatments (non-fertilised area). Moisture concentration within the RB ranged from 6.76% up to 56.68% after large rainfall, more than double the surrounding soils and gradually started migrating from the RB outwards. Soil within 50 cm distance of the RB showed a 24.5% increase in non-biochar soil C compared with soil at 600 cm distance of the RB, 2.54% versus 2.04%, respectively, in the non-fertilised area, which was supported with lowering soil microbial activity. Pasture yield increase was associated with liquid BMC fertiliser rather than proximity to the RB. Pasture yield was 44% higher in the fertilised area compared with the non-fertilised area 27.89 t ha−1 versus 19.31 t ha−1. Approximately 158 kg CO2e was removed from the atmosphere for each cubic meter of RB and an annual removal of 150 kg CO2e ha−1 was estimated by liquid BMC application. Income earned by increased yield was still profitable even though applied liquid BMC could cost between USD 400–520 ha−1 including shipping costs. Overall, our study suggested biochar-based RB and BMC fertilisers can effectively increase soil moisture retention while building non-biochar soil C storage in the surrounding soil. The adoption of biochar-based techniques has the potential to improve drought resilience while increasing soil C in wide range of non-irrigated cropping systems.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信