Quantifying environmental learning and scaling rates for prospective life cycle assessment of e-ammonia production

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Daniel Fozer, Mikołaj Owsianiak, Michael Zwicky Hauschild
{"title":"Quantifying environmental learning and scaling rates for prospective life cycle assessment of e-ammonia production","authors":"Daniel Fozer,&nbsp;Mikołaj Owsianiak,&nbsp;Michael Zwicky Hauschild","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The imperative of a widespread, climate-neutral industrial transition necessitates adopting sustainable-by-design e-ammonia production practices. However, as is the case with early-stage technologies, its full potential in decarbonization and substituting conventional infrastructure at higher manufacturing readiness levels remains unknown. While learning and scaling effects offer insights into future potentials through historical observations, a collection of learning-by-doing, learning-by-searching and scaling data is absent for emerging green transition-related technologies. This study addresses the knowledge gap by building on economic learning theory and combining it with process virtualization to develop an explorative and normative framework for (i) synthesizing environmental learning rates for first-of-a-kind (FOAK) technologies and (ii) using them in prospective life cycle assessment. We consecutively develop and scale 12 e-ammonia processes designing green hydrogen production, ammonia synthesis, and air separation units using ASPEN Plus® V11 software to construct environmental learning curves (R<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>&gt;</mo></mrow></math></span> 0.95). The quantified environmental learning effects, harmonized with shared socioeconomic pathways, show the technology’s comprehensive potential to evolve into an eco-efficient n<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi><mi>h</mi></mrow></msup></math></span>-of-a-kind production line following a 2.5 doubling of experience by 2050. The cumulative environmental progress is driven by a short technology doubling time and moderate to high 3.1-23.4% environmental learning and scaling rates. Prospective projections that involve learning and scaling effects in the foreground system markedly outperform scenarios that consider environmental progress solely in background life cycle inventories. Therefore, future-oriented sustainability assessments need to account for advancements in both foreground and background inventories simultaneously to support and guide eco-friendly technological developments effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115481"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001546","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The imperative of a widespread, climate-neutral industrial transition necessitates adopting sustainable-by-design e-ammonia production practices. However, as is the case with early-stage technologies, its full potential in decarbonization and substituting conventional infrastructure at higher manufacturing readiness levels remains unknown. While learning and scaling effects offer insights into future potentials through historical observations, a collection of learning-by-doing, learning-by-searching and scaling data is absent for emerging green transition-related technologies. This study addresses the knowledge gap by building on economic learning theory and combining it with process virtualization to develop an explorative and normative framework for (i) synthesizing environmental learning rates for first-of-a-kind (FOAK) technologies and (ii) using them in prospective life cycle assessment. We consecutively develop and scale 12 e-ammonia processes designing green hydrogen production, ammonia synthesis, and air separation units using ASPEN Plus® V11 software to construct environmental learning curves (R2> 0.95). The quantified environmental learning effects, harmonized with shared socioeconomic pathways, show the technology’s comprehensive potential to evolve into an eco-efficient nth-of-a-kind production line following a 2.5 doubling of experience by 2050. The cumulative environmental progress is driven by a short technology doubling time and moderate to high 3.1-23.4% environmental learning and scaling rates. Prospective projections that involve learning and scaling effects in the foreground system markedly outperform scenarios that consider environmental progress solely in background life cycle inventories. Therefore, future-oriented sustainability assessments need to account for advancements in both foreground and background inventories simultaneously to support and guide eco-friendly technological developments effectively.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信