Quantifying environmental learning and scaling rates for prospective life cycle assessment of e-ammonia production

IF 18 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115481
Daniel Fozer, Mikołaj Owsianiak, Michael Zwicky Hauschild
{"title":"Quantifying environmental learning and scaling rates for prospective life cycle assessment of e-ammonia production","authors":"Daniel Fozer,&nbsp;Mikołaj Owsianiak,&nbsp;Michael Zwicky Hauschild","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The imperative of a widespread, climate-neutral industrial transition necessitates adopting sustainable-by-design e-ammonia production practices. However, as is the case with early-stage technologies, its full potential in decarbonization and substituting conventional infrastructure at higher manufacturing readiness levels remains unknown. While learning and scaling effects offer insights into future potentials through historical observations, a collection of learning-by-doing, learning-by-searching and scaling data is absent for emerging green transition-related technologies. This study addresses the knowledge gap by building on economic learning theory and combining it with process virtualization to develop an explorative and normative framework for (i) synthesizing environmental learning rates for first-of-a-kind (FOAK) technologies and (ii) using them in prospective life cycle assessment. We consecutively develop and scale 12 e-ammonia processes designing green hydrogen production, ammonia synthesis, and air separation units using ASPEN Plus® V11 software to construct environmental learning curves (R<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>&gt;</mo></mrow></math></span> 0.95). The quantified environmental learning effects, harmonized with shared socioeconomic pathways, show the technology’s comprehensive potential to evolve into an eco-efficient n<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi><mi>h</mi></mrow></msup></math></span>-of-a-kind production line following a 2.5 doubling of experience by 2050. The cumulative environmental progress is driven by a short technology doubling time and moderate to high 3.1-23.4% environmental learning and scaling rates. Prospective projections that involve learning and scaling effects in the foreground system markedly outperform scenarios that consider environmental progress solely in background life cycle inventories. Therefore, future-oriented sustainability assessments need to account for advancements in both foreground and background inventories simultaneously to support and guide eco-friendly technological developments effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115481"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001546","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The imperative of a widespread, climate-neutral industrial transition necessitates adopting sustainable-by-design e-ammonia production practices. However, as is the case with early-stage technologies, its full potential in decarbonization and substituting conventional infrastructure at higher manufacturing readiness levels remains unknown. While learning and scaling effects offer insights into future potentials through historical observations, a collection of learning-by-doing, learning-by-searching and scaling data is absent for emerging green transition-related technologies. This study addresses the knowledge gap by building on economic learning theory and combining it with process virtualization to develop an explorative and normative framework for (i) synthesizing environmental learning rates for first-of-a-kind (FOAK) technologies and (ii) using them in prospective life cycle assessment. We consecutively develop and scale 12 e-ammonia processes designing green hydrogen production, ammonia synthesis, and air separation units using ASPEN Plus® V11 software to construct environmental learning curves (R2> 0.95). The quantified environmental learning effects, harmonized with shared socioeconomic pathways, show the technology’s comprehensive potential to evolve into an eco-efficient nth-of-a-kind production line following a 2.5 doubling of experience by 2050. The cumulative environmental progress is driven by a short technology doubling time and moderate to high 3.1-23.4% environmental learning and scaling rates. Prospective projections that involve learning and scaling effects in the foreground system markedly outperform scenarios that consider environmental progress solely in background life cycle inventories. Therefore, future-oriented sustainability assessments need to account for advancements in both foreground and background inventories simultaneously to support and guide eco-friendly technological developments effectively.

Abstract Image

量化环境学习和标度率对e-氨生产的预期生命周期评估
广泛的、气候中性的工业转型势在必行,必须采用可持续设计的e-氨生产实践。然而,与早期技术的情况一样,它在脱碳和取代传统基础设施方面的全部潜力在更高的制造就绪水平上仍然未知。虽然学习和规模效应通过历史观察提供了对未来潜力的洞察,但对于新兴的绿色转型相关技术,缺乏一组“边做边学”、“边搜索边学”和规模数据。本研究通过建立经济学习理论并将其与过程虚拟化相结合来解决知识差距,以开发一个探索性和规范性框架,用于(i)综合同类技术(FOAK)的环境学习率,以及(ii)在预期生命周期评估中使用它们。我们使用ASPEN Plus®V11软件构建环境学习曲线(R2>;0.95)。量化的环境学习效应,与共享的社会经济途径相协调,显示了该技术的综合潜力,到2050年,该技术的经验将增加2.5倍,并将发展成为一条生态高效的一流生产线。技术翻倍时间较短,环境学习率和尺度率中高,为3.1 ~ 23.4%。在前景系统中涉及学习和尺度效应的前瞻性预测明显优于仅在背景生命周期清单中考虑环境进展的情景。因此,面向未来的可持续性评估需要同时考虑前景和背景清单的进展,以有效地支持和指导生态友好型技术发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书