Daniel Fozer, Mikołaj Owsianiak, Michael Zwicky Hauschild
{"title":"Quantifying environmental learning and scaling rates for prospective life cycle assessment of e-ammonia production","authors":"Daniel Fozer, Mikołaj Owsianiak, Michael Zwicky Hauschild","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The imperative of a widespread, climate-neutral industrial transition necessitates adopting sustainable-by-design e-ammonia production practices. However, as is the case with early-stage technologies, its full potential in decarbonization and substituting conventional infrastructure at higher manufacturing readiness levels remains unknown. While learning and scaling effects offer insights into future potentials through historical observations, a collection of learning-by-doing, learning-by-searching and scaling data is absent for emerging green transition-related technologies. This study addresses the knowledge gap by building on economic learning theory and combining it with process virtualization to develop an explorative and normative framework for (i) synthesizing environmental learning rates for first-of-a-kind (FOAK) technologies and (ii) using them in prospective life cycle assessment. We consecutively develop and scale 12 e-ammonia processes designing green hydrogen production, ammonia synthesis, and air separation units using ASPEN Plus® V11 software to construct environmental learning curves (R<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>></mo></mrow></math></span> 0.95). The quantified environmental learning effects, harmonized with shared socioeconomic pathways, show the technology’s comprehensive potential to evolve into an eco-efficient n<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi><mi>h</mi></mrow></msup></math></span>-of-a-kind production line following a 2.5 doubling of experience by 2050. The cumulative environmental progress is driven by a short technology doubling time and moderate to high 3.1-23.4% environmental learning and scaling rates. Prospective projections that involve learning and scaling effects in the foreground system markedly outperform scenarios that consider environmental progress solely in background life cycle inventories. Therefore, future-oriented sustainability assessments need to account for advancements in both foreground and background inventories simultaneously to support and guide eco-friendly technological developments effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115481"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001546","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The imperative of a widespread, climate-neutral industrial transition necessitates adopting sustainable-by-design e-ammonia production practices. However, as is the case with early-stage technologies, its full potential in decarbonization and substituting conventional infrastructure at higher manufacturing readiness levels remains unknown. While learning and scaling effects offer insights into future potentials through historical observations, a collection of learning-by-doing, learning-by-searching and scaling data is absent for emerging green transition-related technologies. This study addresses the knowledge gap by building on economic learning theory and combining it with process virtualization to develop an explorative and normative framework for (i) synthesizing environmental learning rates for first-of-a-kind (FOAK) technologies and (ii) using them in prospective life cycle assessment. We consecutively develop and scale 12 e-ammonia processes designing green hydrogen production, ammonia synthesis, and air separation units using ASPEN Plus® V11 software to construct environmental learning curves (R 0.95). The quantified environmental learning effects, harmonized with shared socioeconomic pathways, show the technology’s comprehensive potential to evolve into an eco-efficient n-of-a-kind production line following a 2.5 doubling of experience by 2050. The cumulative environmental progress is driven by a short technology doubling time and moderate to high 3.1-23.4% environmental learning and scaling rates. Prospective projections that involve learning and scaling effects in the foreground system markedly outperform scenarios that consider environmental progress solely in background life cycle inventories. Therefore, future-oriented sustainability assessments need to account for advancements in both foreground and background inventories simultaneously to support and guide eco-friendly technological developments effectively.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.