A psychosocial intervention for prenatal anxiety decreases functional disability among pregnant Pakistani women: A moderated mediation approach using data from a randomized controlled trial

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Soim Park , Abid Malik , Ahmed Zaidi , Jamie Perin , Najia Atif , Atif Rahman , Pamela J. Surkan
{"title":"A psychosocial intervention for prenatal anxiety decreases functional disability among pregnant Pakistani women: A moderated mediation approach using data from a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Soim Park ,&nbsp;Abid Malik ,&nbsp;Ahmed Zaidi ,&nbsp;Jamie Perin ,&nbsp;Najia Atif ,&nbsp;Atif Rahman ,&nbsp;Pamela J. Surkan","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Given that anxiety is associated with functional disability, we investigated whether an intervention designed to reduce prenatal anxiety could improve functional disability in the postpartum period. We also examined whether perceived social support in the third trimester mediated this relationship, and if the extent of the mediation differed by economic empowerment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 590 pregnant Pakistani women with at least mild anxiety symptoms to a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Women in the intervention arm received six sessions of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-based psychosocial intervention for prenatal anxiety. Relaxation techniques (e.g., breathing exercises and meditation) and enhancement of social support were also included in the therapy. The control group received enhanced usual care. Economic empowerment was dichotomized into empowered and non-empowered. We used the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) to assess social support, where higher scores indicated greater social support. The WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) was employed to evaluate functional disability which was neither a primary nor a secondary outcome of the RCT. As an ad hoc analysis of the RCT, regression-based path analysis modeling was employed to examine the main, mediating, and moderating effects. Mediation was estimated with the product of coefficients method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The intervention reduced the postpartum functional disability by 4.7 points (adjusted B = -4.71, bootstrapped 95 % confidence interval (CI): −5.93, −3.49), and social support in the late pregnancy mediated this relationship (B<sub>indirect effect</sub> = −0.56, bootstrapped 95 % CI: −0.93, −0.26). A statistically significant index of moderated mediation—showing whether the indirect effects of the mediator vary by the levels of the moderator—indicated that economic empowerment significantly moderated the initial segment of the pathway between the intervention and functional disability (B<sub>difference in indirect effects</sub> = 0.64, bootstrapped 95 % CI: 0.13, 1.27). Social support mediated the main association only for non-empowered women.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While social support can mediate the relationship between psychosocial intervention and functional disability in anxious pregnant women, promotion of social support during late pregnancy may be particularly useful in non-empowered women, for reducing functional disability in the postpartum period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112058"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399925000224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Given that anxiety is associated with functional disability, we investigated whether an intervention designed to reduce prenatal anxiety could improve functional disability in the postpartum period. We also examined whether perceived social support in the third trimester mediated this relationship, and if the extent of the mediation differed by economic empowerment.

Methods

We included 590 pregnant Pakistani women with at least mild anxiety symptoms to a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Women in the intervention arm received six sessions of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-based psychosocial intervention for prenatal anxiety. Relaxation techniques (e.g., breathing exercises and meditation) and enhancement of social support were also included in the therapy. The control group received enhanced usual care. Economic empowerment was dichotomized into empowered and non-empowered. We used the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) to assess social support, where higher scores indicated greater social support. The WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) was employed to evaluate functional disability which was neither a primary nor a secondary outcome of the RCT. As an ad hoc analysis of the RCT, regression-based path analysis modeling was employed to examine the main, mediating, and moderating effects. Mediation was estimated with the product of coefficients method.

Results

The intervention reduced the postpartum functional disability by 4.7 points (adjusted B = -4.71, bootstrapped 95 % confidence interval (CI): −5.93, −3.49), and social support in the late pregnancy mediated this relationship (Bindirect effect = −0.56, bootstrapped 95 % CI: −0.93, −0.26). A statistically significant index of moderated mediation—showing whether the indirect effects of the mediator vary by the levels of the moderator—indicated that economic empowerment significantly moderated the initial segment of the pathway between the intervention and functional disability (Bdifference in indirect effects = 0.64, bootstrapped 95 % CI: 0.13, 1.27). Social support mediated the main association only for non-empowered women.

Conclusion

While social support can mediate the relationship between psychosocial intervention and functional disability in anxious pregnant women, promotion of social support during late pregnancy may be particularly useful in non-empowered women, for reducing functional disability in the postpartum period.
产前焦虑的社会心理干预减少巴基斯坦孕妇的功能障碍:使用随机对照试验数据的调节调解方法
背景:鉴于焦虑与功能障碍有关,我们研究了旨在减少产前焦虑的干预措施是否可以改善产后的功能障碍。我们还研究了妊娠晚期感知到的社会支持是否介导了这种关系,以及经济赋权对中介的影响程度是否有所不同。方法我们将590名至少有轻度焦虑症状的巴基斯坦孕妇纳入随机对照试验(RCT)。干预组的妇女接受了六次基于认知行为疗法的产前焦虑心理干预。放松技巧(如呼吸练习和冥想)和增强社会支持也包括在治疗中。对照组接受强化的日常护理。经济授权被分为授权和非授权。我们使用感知社会支持的多维尺度(MSPSS)来评估社会支持,其中得分越高表明社会支持越大。采用世界卫生组织残疾评估表(WHODAS 2.0)来评估功能性残疾,这既不是RCT的主要结果,也不是次要结果。作为随机对照试验的临时分析,采用基于回归的路径分析模型来检验主要、中介和调节效应。采用系数乘积法对中介效应进行估计。结果干预使产后功能障碍降低4.7分(调整后的B值= -4.71,95%可信区间(CI): - 5.93, - 3.49),孕后期社会支持在其中起中介作用(双直接效应= - 0.56,95%可信区间(CI): - 0.93, - 0.26)。一个具有统计学意义的调节中介指数——显示中介的间接效应是否随调节因子的水平而变化——表明经济赋权显著地调节了干预与功能残疾之间途径的初始部分(间接效应的b差= 0.64,自引导95% CI: 0.13, 1.27)。社会支持只对未获权力的妇女起主要作用。结论社会支持在焦虑孕妇的心理社会干预与功能障碍之间起中介作用,而在妊娠后期促进社会支持对无权能妇女减少产后功能障碍尤为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信