{"title":"Evaluation of the role of serum soluble ST2 as a diagnostic biomarker for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism","authors":"Eman Mohamed Abdellatif, Emad Hamdy Hamouda Mohammed, Azza Mohamed Amin Darwish","doi":"10.1016/j.htct.2025.103740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Venous thromboembolism, a common complication associated with cancer, causes increased morbidity and mortality. D-dimer levels are often increased non-specifically in cancer which limits their use to diagnose venous thromboembolism. The current study aimed to investigate the role of the serum soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) as a new biomarker to diagnose venous thromboembolism in cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighty-eight patients with different types of cancer were enrolled and divided into two groups: Group I: 44 cancer patients with confirmed diagnosis of venous thromboembolism and Group II: 44 age- and sex-matched cancer patients without any thrombotic complications. The D-dimer test and sST2 measurement were performed for all study subjects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Serum sST2 levels were significantly higher in Group I than in Group II (<em>p</em>-value < 0.001); the median serum sST2 was 13.02 ng/mL (range: 7.65–117.9 ng/mL) in Group I versus 8.56 ng/mL (range: 5.59–10.33 ng/mL) in Group II. There was a significant positive correlation between serum sST2 and the D-dimer level. Using a receiver operating characteristic curve, sST2 had a greater area under the curve than the D-dimer test (0.974 versus 0.869, respectively). Although the D-dimer test was more sensitive, sST2 had a greater specificity than D-dimer (95.45 % versus 27.3 %, respectively) and a higher positive predictive value (95.3 % versus 56.8 %, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of the current study support a potential role of soluble ST2 to aid in diagnosing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12958,"journal":{"name":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","volume":"47 1","pages":"Article 103740"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137925000082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Venous thromboembolism, a common complication associated with cancer, causes increased morbidity and mortality. D-dimer levels are often increased non-specifically in cancer which limits their use to diagnose venous thromboembolism. The current study aimed to investigate the role of the serum soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) as a new biomarker to diagnose venous thromboembolism in cancer.
Methods
Eighty-eight patients with different types of cancer were enrolled and divided into two groups: Group I: 44 cancer patients with confirmed diagnosis of venous thromboembolism and Group II: 44 age- and sex-matched cancer patients without any thrombotic complications. The D-dimer test and sST2 measurement were performed for all study subjects.
Results
Serum sST2 levels were significantly higher in Group I than in Group II (p-value < 0.001); the median serum sST2 was 13.02 ng/mL (range: 7.65–117.9 ng/mL) in Group I versus 8.56 ng/mL (range: 5.59–10.33 ng/mL) in Group II. There was a significant positive correlation between serum sST2 and the D-dimer level. Using a receiver operating characteristic curve, sST2 had a greater area under the curve than the D-dimer test (0.974 versus 0.869, respectively). Although the D-dimer test was more sensitive, sST2 had a greater specificity than D-dimer (95.45 % versus 27.3 %, respectively) and a higher positive predictive value (95.3 % versus 56.8 %, respectively).
Conclusion
The results of the current study support a potential role of soluble ST2 to aid in diagnosing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients.