Monotherapy with tolterodine or mirabegron is insufficient for ameliorating cyclophosphamide-induced bladder overactivity in rats

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Håvard Fjelltveit , Thomas Carlsson , Fernando Perez , Ozgu Aydogdu , Bhavik Patel , Michael Winder
{"title":"Monotherapy with tolterodine or mirabegron is insufficient for ameliorating cyclophosphamide-induced bladder overactivity in rats","authors":"Håvard Fjelltveit ,&nbsp;Thomas Carlsson ,&nbsp;Fernando Perez ,&nbsp;Ozgu Aydogdu ,&nbsp;Bhavik Patel ,&nbsp;Michael Winder","doi":"10.1016/j.autneu.2025.103253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Monotherapy continues to be the most common pharmacological treatment option for patients with overactive bladder (OAB), despite evidence indicating that it may have inferior efficacy compared to combination therapy. This seems to be especially true for patients with concomitant cystitis. The current study examined the effects of monotherapy with either the antimuscarinic tolterodine or the β3 agonist mirabegron on bladder overactivity induced by bladder inflammation. Further, the possible involvement of nitric oxide (NO) was studied. For this purpose, rats were pretreated with either drug for 10 days. Bladder inflammation was induced by intraperitoneal injection with cyclophosphamide, with saline serving as control. Micturition parameters were assessed in a metabolic cage. Meanwhile, urine samples were collected and further analysed for NO content. After 16 h, the animals were euthanized, and their bladders were excised and examined immunohistochemically for signs of inflammation. Cyclophosphamide treatment led to bladder overactivity and obvious signs of inflammation. Neither treatment with tolterodine nor mirabegron could significantly alleviate the induced overactivity or the observed inflammation. Further, while induction of inflammation led to a significant increase in NO production, neither drug seemed to act by further enhancing its production. On the contrary, treatment with either tolterodine or mirabegron significantly decreased NO production in cyclophosphamide treated rats. Considering previous findings showing significant improvement by combination therapy, the current study indirectly implies this as the superior treatment option. Further studies are needed to verify the involvement, or lack thereof, of NO in the mechanism of action of drugs used to treat OAB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55410,"journal":{"name":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 103253"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566070225000153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monotherapy continues to be the most common pharmacological treatment option for patients with overactive bladder (OAB), despite evidence indicating that it may have inferior efficacy compared to combination therapy. This seems to be especially true for patients with concomitant cystitis. The current study examined the effects of monotherapy with either the antimuscarinic tolterodine or the β3 agonist mirabegron on bladder overactivity induced by bladder inflammation. Further, the possible involvement of nitric oxide (NO) was studied. For this purpose, rats were pretreated with either drug for 10 days. Bladder inflammation was induced by intraperitoneal injection with cyclophosphamide, with saline serving as control. Micturition parameters were assessed in a metabolic cage. Meanwhile, urine samples were collected and further analysed for NO content. After 16 h, the animals were euthanized, and their bladders were excised and examined immunohistochemically for signs of inflammation. Cyclophosphamide treatment led to bladder overactivity and obvious signs of inflammation. Neither treatment with tolterodine nor mirabegron could significantly alleviate the induced overactivity or the observed inflammation. Further, while induction of inflammation led to a significant increase in NO production, neither drug seemed to act by further enhancing its production. On the contrary, treatment with either tolterodine or mirabegron significantly decreased NO production in cyclophosphamide treated rats. Considering previous findings showing significant improvement by combination therapy, the current study indirectly implies this as the superior treatment option. Further studies are needed to verify the involvement, or lack thereof, of NO in the mechanism of action of drugs used to treat OAB.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: This is an international journal with broad coverage of all aspects of the autonomic nervous system in man and animals. The main areas of interest include the innervation of blood vessels and viscera, autonomic ganglia, efferent and afferent autonomic pathways, and autonomic nuclei and pathways in the central nervous system. The Editors will consider papers that deal with any aspect of the autonomic nervous system, including structure, physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, development, evolution, ageing, behavioural aspects, integrative role and influence on emotional and physical states of the body. Interdisciplinary studies will be encouraged. Studies dealing with human pathology will be also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信