Armed conflict and treatment interruptions: A systematic review and meta-analysis in Amhara, Ethiopia

IF 3.9 3区医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.039

Mihretie Gedfew, Addisu Getie, Temesgen Ayenew, Baye Tsegaye Amlak, Mengistu Abebe Meselu, Abebe Dilie Afenigus, Haile Amha

{"title":"Armed conflict and treatment interruptions: A systematic review and meta-analysis in Amhara, Ethiopia","authors":"Mihretie Gedfew, Addisu Getie, Temesgen Ayenew, Baye Tsegaye Amlak, Mengistu Abebe Meselu, Abebe Dilie Afenigus, Haile Amha","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Armed conflicts significantly disrupt healthcare systems, leading to infrastructure destruction, shortages of medical supplies, and reduced access to essential health services. The Amhara region has experienced prolonged conflict, raising concerns about its impact on healthcare delivery. Understanding the extent of these disruptions is crucial for informing policy responses and humanitarian interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of armed conflict on healthcare delivery in the Amhara region.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Conducted between June 1 and July 10, 2024, this meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included English-language observational studies and grey literature addressing healthcare disruptions, infrastructure damage, and health crises. Data were analyzed using STATA Version 14, and study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve studies, encompassing 12,037,279 participants, were included. The pooled prevalence of health impacts was 76.71 % (95 % CI: 76.63–76.78). The conflict rendered 60 % of healthcare facilities nonfunctional, disrupted medical supplies for 70 % of the population, and reduced service availability by 80 %. Chronic disease management, mental health services, maternal care, and immunization programs experienced significant declines. Subgroup analyses indicated a higher prevalence of health impacts in studies published after 2022 (70.72 %) compared to those published before 2022 (28.35 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Armed conflict in the Amhara region has severely disrupted healthcare services, leading to facility closures, medical supply shortages, and significant declines in essential health services. Urgent interventions are required to restore healthcare infrastructure and services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"241 ","pages":"Pages 122-128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625000605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Armed conflicts significantly disrupt healthcare systems, leading to infrastructure destruction, shortages of medical supplies, and reduced access to essential health services. The Amhara region has experienced prolonged conflict, raising concerns about its impact on healthcare delivery. Understanding the extent of these disruptions is crucial for informing policy responses and humanitarian interventions.

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of armed conflict on healthcare delivery in the Amhara region.

Study design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Conducted between June 1 and July 10, 2024, this meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included English-language observational studies and grey literature addressing healthcare disruptions, infrastructure damage, and health crises. Data were analyzed using STATA Version 14, and study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results

Twelve studies, encompassing 12,037,279 participants, were included. The pooled prevalence of health impacts was 76.71 % (95 % CI: 76.63–76.78). The conflict rendered 60 % of healthcare facilities nonfunctional, disrupted medical supplies for 70 % of the population, and reduced service availability by 80 %. Chronic disease management, mental health services, maternal care, and immunization programs experienced significant declines. Subgroup analyses indicated a higher prevalence of health impacts in studies published after 2022 (70.72 %) compared to those published before 2022 (28.35 %).

Conclusion

Armed conflict in the Amhara region has severely disrupted healthcare services, leading to facility closures, medical supply shortages, and significant declines in essential health services. Urgent interventions are required to restore healthcare infrastructure and services.

查看原文本刊更多论文

武装冲突与治疗中断：埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区的系统回顾和荟萃分析

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

7.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

280

审稿时长

37 days

期刊介绍： Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.