Farmer driven water conservation policy on the Ogallala aquifer reduces the environmental footprints of crop production

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
José P. Castaño-Sánchez , C. Alan Rotz , Jean L. Steiner , Bill Golden , Sheri A. Spiegal
{"title":"Farmer driven water conservation policy on the Ogallala aquifer reduces the environmental footprints of crop production","authors":"José P. Castaño-Sánchez ,&nbsp;C. Alan Rotz ,&nbsp;Jean L. Steiner ,&nbsp;Bill Golden ,&nbsp;Sheri A. Spiegal","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Ogallala Aquifer underlies 45 million hectares, supporting the robust agricultural economy of the US Great Plains and providing water for about 1.9 million people. The aquifer's long-term viability is threatened though due to severe depletion. Pumping reductions of 25–30 % are required to stabilize water levels on a decadal scale. Legislation has been passed in Kansas to reduce groundwater extraction while supporting productivity and economic viability. One outcome is the Local Enhanced Management Area (LEMA) program, where farmers set water-conservation targets in a region. Our objective was to study the environmental benefits of implementing water-conserving cropping systems in the Sheridan-6 LEMA (longest running LEMA). The Integrated Farm System Model (IFSM), verified with region-specific data, was used to compare simulated cropping systems within the LEMA to those in the surrounding region using conventional crop irrigation management. We found that LEMA management, which includes reduced water use and altered cropping, has provided environmental benefits with a slight to moderate reduction in crop yields (1.2–15 %). Totaled over the LEMA, crop life cycle reductions were found for blue water use (28 %), reactive N losses (1.4 %), fossil energy use (22 %) and GHG emissions (20 %). Considering the environmental intensities expressed per unit of grain produced, LEMA policies decreased blue water (24 %), energy (18 %), and C (15 %) footprints. The exception was the N footprint which increased slightly due to reduced crop yields with similar N loss. The main driver of the reduced impact was decreased water use in crop irrigation, followed by changes in cropping strategies where more water-demanding crops (corn and soybean) were replaced by less water-demanding crops (sorghum and wheat). Replicating LEMA-type policies more widely across the region can be a viable solution (environmental and economic) to stabilize the Ogallala Aquifer water levels for the next few decades, as demonstrated by this and previous research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"310 ","pages":"Article 109370"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425000848","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ogallala Aquifer underlies 45 million hectares, supporting the robust agricultural economy of the US Great Plains and providing water for about 1.9 million people. The aquifer's long-term viability is threatened though due to severe depletion. Pumping reductions of 25–30 % are required to stabilize water levels on a decadal scale. Legislation has been passed in Kansas to reduce groundwater extraction while supporting productivity and economic viability. One outcome is the Local Enhanced Management Area (LEMA) program, where farmers set water-conservation targets in a region. Our objective was to study the environmental benefits of implementing water-conserving cropping systems in the Sheridan-6 LEMA (longest running LEMA). The Integrated Farm System Model (IFSM), verified with region-specific data, was used to compare simulated cropping systems within the LEMA to those in the surrounding region using conventional crop irrigation management. We found that LEMA management, which includes reduced water use and altered cropping, has provided environmental benefits with a slight to moderate reduction in crop yields (1.2–15 %). Totaled over the LEMA, crop life cycle reductions were found for blue water use (28 %), reactive N losses (1.4 %), fossil energy use (22 %) and GHG emissions (20 %). Considering the environmental intensities expressed per unit of grain produced, LEMA policies decreased blue water (24 %), energy (18 %), and C (15 %) footprints. The exception was the N footprint which increased slightly due to reduced crop yields with similar N loss. The main driver of the reduced impact was decreased water use in crop irrigation, followed by changes in cropping strategies where more water-demanding crops (corn and soybean) were replaced by less water-demanding crops (sorghum and wheat). Replicating LEMA-type policies more widely across the region can be a viable solution (environmental and economic) to stabilize the Ogallala Aquifer water levels for the next few decades, as demonstrated by this and previous research.

Abstract Image

农民推动的奥加拉拉含水层节水政策减少了作物生产的环境足迹
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信