Natalia A. Cano-Londoño , Rebecca Saive , Tim Bekius , Laura Franco-García
{"title":"Prediction and assessment methods for sustainable solar energy systems within our planetary boundaries: how reliable are they?","authors":"Natalia A. Cano-Londoño , Rebecca Saive , Tim Bekius , Laura Franco-García","doi":"10.1016/j.coche.2025.101100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a critical analysis of the sustainability of solar energy systems within the planetary boundaries framework, which sets the limits within which humanity can safely operate. Given the substantial contribution of the energy sector to global greenhouse gas emissions, solar energy has emerged as a crucial element in the shift toward a sustainable energy future. Nevertheless, numerous challenges impede solar energy systems reaching optimal effectiveness, encompassing technological and methodological sustainable tools constraints, environmental impacts, and socioeconomic implications. This research aims to comprehensively assess these challenges and propose strategies to surmount them through applying a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment approach. The primary research question addressed is, \"How reliable are the predictive and anticipatory assessment methods for sustainable solar energy systems within our planetary boundaries?\" The study integrated circular economy principles, criticality evaluation, and advanced technological tools to enhance solar energy systems’ efficiency, environmental performance, and socioeconomic benefits. By addressing the entire life cycle of solar technologies — from material extraction to end-of-life (cradle-to-grave) — this work seeks to contribute to developing more sustainable solar energy systems that operate within the safe limits of our planet’s boundaries. The findings highlight the need for a holistic approach that not only focuses on technological advancements but also considers the broader environmental and socioeconomic impacts to ensure a truly sustainable energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":292,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 101100"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211339825000115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a critical analysis of the sustainability of solar energy systems within the planetary boundaries framework, which sets the limits within which humanity can safely operate. Given the substantial contribution of the energy sector to global greenhouse gas emissions, solar energy has emerged as a crucial element in the shift toward a sustainable energy future. Nevertheless, numerous challenges impede solar energy systems reaching optimal effectiveness, encompassing technological and methodological sustainable tools constraints, environmental impacts, and socioeconomic implications. This research aims to comprehensively assess these challenges and propose strategies to surmount them through applying a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment approach. The primary research question addressed is, "How reliable are the predictive and anticipatory assessment methods for sustainable solar energy systems within our planetary boundaries?" The study integrated circular economy principles, criticality evaluation, and advanced technological tools to enhance solar energy systems’ efficiency, environmental performance, and socioeconomic benefits. By addressing the entire life cycle of solar technologies — from material extraction to end-of-life (cradle-to-grave) — this work seeks to contribute to developing more sustainable solar energy systems that operate within the safe limits of our planet’s boundaries. The findings highlight the need for a holistic approach that not only focuses on technological advancements but also considers the broader environmental and socioeconomic impacts to ensure a truly sustainable energy transition.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering is devoted to bringing forth short and focused review articles written by experts on current advances in different areas of chemical engineering. Only invited review articles will be published.
The goals of each review article in Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering are:
1. To acquaint the reader/researcher with the most important recent papers in the given topic.
2. To provide the reader with the views/opinions of the expert in each topic.
The reviews are short (about 2500 words or 5-10 printed pages with figures) and serve as an invaluable source of information for researchers, teachers, professionals and students. The reviews also aim to stimulate exchange of ideas among experts.
Themed sections:
Each review will focus on particular aspects of one of the following themed sections of chemical engineering:
1. Nanotechnology
2. Energy and environmental engineering
3. Biotechnology and bioprocess engineering
4. Biological engineering (covering tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, drug delivery)
5. Separation engineering (covering membrane technologies, adsorbents, desalination, distillation etc.)
6. Materials engineering (covering biomaterials, inorganic especially ceramic materials, nanostructured materials).
7. Process systems engineering
8. Reaction engineering and catalysis.