Santoesha A Ghisai, Nastaran Barin, Levi van Hijfte, Kim Verhagen, Maurice de Wit, Martin J van den Bent, Youri Hoogstrate, Pim J French
{"title":"Transcriptomic analysis of <i>EGFR</i> co-expression and activation in glioblastoma reveals associations with its ligands.","authors":"Santoesha A Ghisai, Nastaran Barin, Levi van Hijfte, Kim Verhagen, Maurice de Wit, Martin J van den Bent, Youri Hoogstrate, Pim J French","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately half of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastomas (GBMs) exhibit <i>EGFR</i> amplification. Additionally, genomic changes that occur in the extracellular domain of <i>EGFR</i> can lead to ligand-hypersensitivity (R108K/A289V/G598V) or ligand-independence (<i>EGFRvIII</i>). Unlike in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), clinical trials with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors showed no survival benefit for GBM and it remains unclear why. We aimed to elucidate differences in molecular mechanisms of <i>EGFR</i> activation and regulation between GBM and LUAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data to find <i>EGFR</i> co-regulated genes and pathways in GBM and compare <i>EGFR</i> signaling patterns between GBM and LUAD. Cellular origins of expression signals were determined by analyzing single-cell RNA-seq data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2 ligands (<i>BTC</i>/<i>EREG</i>) among the significant EGFR predictor genes (TCGA-GBM: <i>n</i> = 169, Intellance-2: <i>n</i> = 166). Their expression was inversely correlated with <i>EGFR</i> amplification and incidence of ligand-sensitive mutations. Ligands were expressed by nonmalignant cells and differed in their primary source of expression (<i>BTC</i>: neurons, <i>EREG</i>: myeloid). High expression of <i>MDM2</i> and <i>CDK4</i> was less common in EGFR-amplified GBMs with ligand-sensitive mutations compared with those without these mutations. Our analyses revealed distinct transcriptional profiles between GBM and LUAD when comparing tumors carrying activating mutations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>BTC</i> and <i>EREG</i> are negatively associated with <i>EGFR</i> expression in GBM. These findings emphasize the role of ligands in regulating <i>EGFR</i>, where <i>EGFR</i> activation seems to be modulated by the highly varying levels of <i>EGFR</i> amplification, the sensitivity of the receptor toward ligands, and ligand expression levels. Ligand expression levels and <i>EGFR</i> mutations could refine patient stratification for EGFR-targeted therapies in GBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdae229"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Approximately half of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastomas (GBMs) exhibit EGFR amplification. Additionally, genomic changes that occur in the extracellular domain of EGFR can lead to ligand-hypersensitivity (R108K/A289V/G598V) or ligand-independence (EGFRvIII). Unlike in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), clinical trials with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors showed no survival benefit for GBM and it remains unclear why. We aimed to elucidate differences in molecular mechanisms of EGFR activation and regulation between GBM and LUAD.
Methods: We used RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data to find EGFR co-regulated genes and pathways in GBM and compare EGFR signaling patterns between GBM and LUAD. Cellular origins of expression signals were determined by analyzing single-cell RNA-seq data.
Results: We identified 2 ligands (BTC/EREG) among the significant EGFR predictor genes (TCGA-GBM: n = 169, Intellance-2: n = 166). Their expression was inversely correlated with EGFR amplification and incidence of ligand-sensitive mutations. Ligands were expressed by nonmalignant cells and differed in their primary source of expression (BTC: neurons, EREG: myeloid). High expression of MDM2 and CDK4 was less common in EGFR-amplified GBMs with ligand-sensitive mutations compared with those without these mutations. Our analyses revealed distinct transcriptional profiles between GBM and LUAD when comparing tumors carrying activating mutations.
Conclusions: BTC and EREG are negatively associated with EGFR expression in GBM. These findings emphasize the role of ligands in regulating EGFR, where EGFR activation seems to be modulated by the highly varying levels of EGFR amplification, the sensitivity of the receptor toward ligands, and ligand expression levels. Ligand expression levels and EGFR mutations could refine patient stratification for EGFR-targeted therapies in GBM.
背景:大约一半的异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)野生型胶质母细胞瘤(GBMs)表现出EGFR扩增。此外,发生在EGFR细胞外区域的基因组变化可导致配体超敏(R108K/A289V/G598V)或配体非依赖性(EGFRvIII)。与肺腺癌(LUAD)不同,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制剂的临床试验显示GBM没有生存获益,原因尚不清楚。我们旨在阐明GBM和LUAD之间EGFR激活和调节的分子机制的差异。方法:利用rna测序(RNA-seq)数据寻找GBM中EGFR共调控基因和通路,并比较GBM和LUAD之间的EGFR信号模式。通过分析单细胞RNA-seq数据确定表达信号的细胞起源。结果:我们在显著EGFR预测基因(TCGA-GBM: n = 169, intelligence -2: n = 166)中鉴定出2个配体(BTC/EREG)。它们的表达与EGFR扩增和配体敏感突变的发生率呈负相关。配体由非恶性细胞表达,其主要表达来源不同(BTC:神经元,EREG:髓细胞)。与没有这些突变的GBMs相比,具有配体敏感突变的egfr扩增GBMs中MDM2和CDK4的高表达较少。我们的分析表明,在比较携带激活突变的肿瘤时,GBM和LUAD之间存在不同的转录谱。结论:BTC和EREG与GBM中EGFR表达呈负相关。这些发现强调了配体在调节EGFR中的作用,其中EGFR的激活似乎受到高度变化的EGFR扩增水平、受体对配体的敏感性和配体表达水平的调节。配体表达水平和EGFR突变可以细化GBM中EGFR靶向治疗的患者分层。