Depressive Symptoms and Epistemological Approaches: A Qualitative Study Among Psychiatrists: Symptômes dépressifs et approches épistémologiques : une étude qualitative auprès de psychiatres.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Clémence Piaux, Céline Bourquin, Friedrich Stiefel
{"title":"Depressive Symptoms and Epistemological Approaches: A Qualitative Study Among Psychiatrists: Symptômes dépressifs et approches épistémologiques : une étude qualitative auprès de psychiatres.","authors":"Clémence Piaux, Céline Bourquin, Friedrich Stiefel","doi":"10.1177/07067437251317245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aimed to investigate how psychiatrists handle the diagnosis and treatment of depression in the adult.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Psychiatrists (<i>N</i> = 17) of the French-speaking Canton of Vaud (Switzerland), working in public institutions or in private sector (cabinets), having different theoretical backgrounds depending on their training (systemic, cognitive-behavioural or psychodynamic) and different duration of clinical experiences were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical vignette presenting a young man with depressive symptoms of moderate intensity having experienced multiples losses during the development and recent past was presented to the participants. Participants were invited to read the vignette and react (\"thinking aloud\"), followed by an invitation to elaborate on the diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A heterogeneous approach towards the diagnosis and treatment of depression was observed. Without a consensus regarding the diagnosis of depressions, two distinct ways to understand the clinical vignette emerged: one pathogenic, identifying the underlying causes of the depressive symptoms, and the other nosological, based on diagnostic criteria. Consequently, proposition for treatment also diverged ranging from psychotherapy, psychotropic medication, complementary and alternative treatments, and paramedical approaches such as ergo- and socio-therapy, at times leaving the choice up to the patient. Possible explanations for this diversity are a more or less strict adherence to diagnostic criteria used by the psychiatrists, be they ICD or DSM, the double training as psychiatrist and psychotherapist which is mandatory in Switzerland, a certain prudence regarding psychiatric diagnoses by fear of stigmatisation, attention to the therapeutic alliance or divergent views on the theoretical and conceptual understanding of depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study underline the importance to include the epistemology of psychiatric disorders in training to raise awareness and conscientization regarding the influence of epistemological aspects on attitudes and approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of depression and other psychiatric disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"7067437251317245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437251317245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to investigate how psychiatrists handle the diagnosis and treatment of depression in the adult.

Participants: Psychiatrists (N = 17) of the French-speaking Canton of Vaud (Switzerland), working in public institutions or in private sector (cabinets), having different theoretical backgrounds depending on their training (systemic, cognitive-behavioural or psychodynamic) and different duration of clinical experiences were included in the study.

Methods: A clinical vignette presenting a young man with depressive symptoms of moderate intensity having experienced multiples losses during the development and recent past was presented to the participants. Participants were invited to read the vignette and react ("thinking aloud"), followed by an invitation to elaborate on the diagnosis and treatment.

Results: A heterogeneous approach towards the diagnosis and treatment of depression was observed. Without a consensus regarding the diagnosis of depressions, two distinct ways to understand the clinical vignette emerged: one pathogenic, identifying the underlying causes of the depressive symptoms, and the other nosological, based on diagnostic criteria. Consequently, proposition for treatment also diverged ranging from psychotherapy, psychotropic medication, complementary and alternative treatments, and paramedical approaches such as ergo- and socio-therapy, at times leaving the choice up to the patient. Possible explanations for this diversity are a more or less strict adherence to diagnostic criteria used by the psychiatrists, be they ICD or DSM, the double training as psychiatrist and psychotherapist which is mandatory in Switzerland, a certain prudence regarding psychiatric diagnoses by fear of stigmatisation, attention to the therapeutic alliance or divergent views on the theoretical and conceptual understanding of depression.

Conclusion: The results of this study underline the importance to include the epistemology of psychiatric disorders in training to raise awareness and conscientization regarding the influence of epistemological aspects on attitudes and approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of depression and other psychiatric disorders.

抑郁症状和认识论方法:精神科医生的定性研究。
背景:本研究旨在探讨精神科医生如何处理成人抑郁症的诊断和治疗。参与者:来自讲法语的瑞士沃州的精神病学家(N = 17),他们在公共机构或私营部门(内阁)工作,根据他们的培训(系统、认知行为或心理动力学)有不同的理论背景和不同的临床经验持续时间被纳入研究。方法:一篇临床小短文,向参与者介绍了一名患有中度抑郁症状的年轻人,在发展和最近的过去期间经历了多次损失。参与者被邀请阅读小短文并做出反应(“大声思考”),然后被邀请详细说明诊断和治疗。结果:观察到抑郁症的诊断和治疗方法存在异质性。在对抑郁症的诊断没有共识的情况下,出现了两种截然不同的理解临床症状的方法:一种是病原学,确定抑郁症状的潜在原因,另一种是病理性,基于诊断标准。因此,对治疗的主张也出现了分歧,从心理治疗、精神药物治疗、补充和替代治疗,到辅助医疗方法,如心理治疗和社会治疗,有时让病人自己选择。对这种多样性的可能解释是,精神科医生或多或少严格遵守精神科医生使用的诊断标准,无论是ICD还是DSM,作为精神科医生和心理治疗师的双重培训在瑞士是强制性的,由于害怕污名化,对精神科诊断的某种谨慎,关注治疗联盟或对抑郁症的理论和概念理解的不同观点。结论:本研究结果强调了将精神疾病认识论纳入培训的重要性,以提高对认识论方面对抑郁症和其他精神疾病诊断和治疗的态度和方法的影响的认识和尽责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1956, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (The CJP) has been keeping psychiatrists up-to-date on the latest research for nearly 60 years. The CJP provides a forum for psychiatry and mental health professionals to share their findings with researchers and clinicians. The CJP includes peer-reviewed scientific articles analyzing ongoing developments in Canadian and international psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信