Clinical Evolution and Safety of a Cryotherapy - Based Spray for Mild to Moderate Joint and Muscle Pain: A Descriptive Observational Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.128589
Manuel A Ballester Herrera, Josep M Muñoz Vives, Agusti Marti
{"title":"Clinical Evolution and Safety of a Cryotherapy - Based Spray for Mild to Moderate Joint and Muscle Pain: A Descriptive Observational Study.","authors":"Manuel A Ballester Herrera, Josep M Muñoz Vives, Agusti Marti","doi":"10.26603/001c.128589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryotherapy, long used for its pain-relieving and anti-inflammatory effects, is widely applied in sports medicine, physiotherapy, and postoperative care. Advances in cryotherapy methods, including the use of topical vapocoolant sprays, offer enhanced pain management and support recovery from musculoskeletal injuries by alleviating pain and reducing swelling in a targeted manner.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis/purpose: </strong>The primary aim was to assess both immediate and sustained pain relief in subjects with mild to moderate musculoskeletal complaints.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-nine participants with mild to moderate musculoskeletal pain participated in a three-week observational study evaluating a cryotherapy spray. Pain and range of motion (ROM) were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and goniometer measurements at multiple time points, including T-1 (before treatment), T0 (beginning of treatment), T2-min, T5-min, T10-min, T15-min, T30-min, T60-min, T7-days, T14-days, while participants were actively receiving treatment exclusively with the cryotherapy spray, and T21-days (1 week after treatment cessation). Acceptability Test and additional subjective questionnaires evaluated participants analysis of cooling sensation and product tolerance. Data were analyzed using Cumulative Logit Mixed Models (CLMM) and the non-parametric Friedman test for repeated measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cryotherapy spray significantly reduced pain (VAS) from baseline (p < 0.001, Hedges' g = -1.90) and improved joint mobility (ROM) with derived scores increasing from 3 (3-4) to 4 (4-4) by Day 21 (p < 0.001). Rapid pain relief was reported by 35% of participants within 10 seconds, with 80% experiencing relief within three minutes. Comfort ratings were consistently high, with 95% of participants expressing satisfaction at Day 0, rising to 99% by Day 14. Global efficacy satisfaction measured by a subjective Likert scale also increased from 75% at baseline to 95% by Day 14. No adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the effectiveness of the cryotherapy spray in reducing pain and improving joint mobility, with both immediate and sustained benefits. High patient satisfaction and a favorable safety profile suggest its potential for clinical use. Further controlled studies could confirm its efficacy in broader populations.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 2","pages":"243-252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.128589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cryotherapy, long used for its pain-relieving and anti-inflammatory effects, is widely applied in sports medicine, physiotherapy, and postoperative care. Advances in cryotherapy methods, including the use of topical vapocoolant sprays, offer enhanced pain management and support recovery from musculoskeletal injuries by alleviating pain and reducing swelling in a targeted manner.

Hypothesis/purpose: The primary aim was to assess both immediate and sustained pain relief in subjects with mild to moderate musculoskeletal complaints.

Study design: Observational cohort study.

Methods: Fifty-nine participants with mild to moderate musculoskeletal pain participated in a three-week observational study evaluating a cryotherapy spray. Pain and range of motion (ROM) were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and goniometer measurements at multiple time points, including T-1 (before treatment), T0 (beginning of treatment), T2-min, T5-min, T10-min, T15-min, T30-min, T60-min, T7-days, T14-days, while participants were actively receiving treatment exclusively with the cryotherapy spray, and T21-days (1 week after treatment cessation). Acceptability Test and additional subjective questionnaires evaluated participants analysis of cooling sensation and product tolerance. Data were analyzed using Cumulative Logit Mixed Models (CLMM) and the non-parametric Friedman test for repeated measures.

Results: The cryotherapy spray significantly reduced pain (VAS) from baseline (p < 0.001, Hedges' g = -1.90) and improved joint mobility (ROM) with derived scores increasing from 3 (3-4) to 4 (4-4) by Day 21 (p < 0.001). Rapid pain relief was reported by 35% of participants within 10 seconds, with 80% experiencing relief within three minutes. Comfort ratings were consistently high, with 95% of participants expressing satisfaction at Day 0, rising to 99% by Day 14. Global efficacy satisfaction measured by a subjective Likert scale also increased from 75% at baseline to 95% by Day 14. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: This study supports the effectiveness of the cryotherapy spray in reducing pain and improving joint mobility, with both immediate and sustained benefits. High patient satisfaction and a favorable safety profile suggest its potential for clinical use. Further controlled studies could confirm its efficacy in broader populations.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

背景:冷冻疗法因其止痛和消炎效果而被长期使用,并被广泛应用于运动医学、物理治疗和术后护理中。冷冻疗法方法的进步,包括局部蒸汽冷却剂喷雾剂的使用,通过有针对性地减轻疼痛和消肿,加强了疼痛管理并有助于肌肉骨骼损伤的恢复。假设/目的:研究的主要目的是评估轻度至中度肌肉骨骼不适患者的即时和持续疼痛缓解情况:观察性队列研究:59名患有轻度至中度肌肉骨骼疼痛的受试者参加了一项为期三周的观察研究,对冷冻喷雾疗法进行评估。在多个时间点,包括T-1(治疗前)、T0(治疗开始)、T2-min、T5-min、T10-min、T15-min、T30-min、T60-min、T7-days、T14-days(参与者正积极接受冷冻喷雾治疗)和T21-days(治疗停止后1周),使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和动态关节角度计对疼痛和活动范围(ROM)进行评估。可接受性测试和其他主观问卷调查评估了参与者对冷却感觉和产品耐受性的分析。数据采用累积对数混合模型(CLMM)和非参数弗里德曼重复测量检验进行分析:结果:到第 21 天时,冷冻喷雾明显减轻了基线疼痛(VAS)(p < 0.001,Hedges' g = -1.90),改善了关节活动度(ROM),衍生评分从 3 分(3-4)提高到 4 分(4-4)(p < 0.001)。据报道,35%的参与者在 10 秒钟内疼痛迅速缓解,80%的参与者在 3 分钟内疼痛缓解。舒适度评分一直很高,第 0 天有 95% 的参与者表示满意,第 14 天上升到 99%。用李克特主观量表测量的总体疗效满意度也从基线时的 75% 上升到第 14 天的 95%。无不良反应报告:这项研究证实了冷冻疗法喷雾剂在减轻疼痛和改善关节活动度方面的有效性,并具有立竿见影和持续有效的效果。患者满意度高,安全性好,表明其具有临床应用潜力。进一步的对照研究可确认其在更广泛人群中的疗效:证据等级:3 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信