Assessing Sedation Depth with PSI in Elderly ERCP Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S504212
Lei Huang, Lin-Lin Liu, Yong-da Lu, Min-Yuan Zhuang, Wei Dou, Hong Liu, Fu-Hai Ji, Ke Peng
{"title":"Assessing Sedation Depth with PSI in Elderly ERCP Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Lei Huang, Lin-Lin Liu, Yong-da Lu, Min-Yuan Zhuang, Wei Dou, Hong Liu, Fu-Hai Ji, Ke Peng","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S504212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate sedation is important for elderly patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patient state index (PSI) via the SedLine® system has been utilized for real-time monitoring of anesthesia depth in surgical patients. We aimed to assess the correlation between PSI and Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores in elderly patients undergoing ERCP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included 57 elderly patients scheduled for ERCP procedures. Patients received target-controlled infusion of propofol, titrated to the sedation level of MOAA/S scores of 1 and 2. The MOAA/S scores and PSI values were recorded during sedation and recovery. We also documented procedure and recovery time, oversedation (PSI < 25 for at least 10 min and EEG burst suppression), adverse events, and fatigue scores (0-10, higher scores indicating more fatigue).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed this study (mean age of 73 years and 63% male), with a mean procedure time of 53 min and recovery time of 37 min. Five patients (8.8%) experienced PSI < 25 for at least 10 min, and three of them (5.3%) showed EEG burst suppression. No patients developed desaturation or intra-procedural awareness. Hypotension and abdominal pain were uncommon. Nine patients (15.8%) experienced mild dizziness or nausea. The median (IQR) fatigue score was 3 (2-4) at recovery room discharge. A significant correlation was observed between the MOAA/S scores and PSI values (Spearman correlation coefficient <i>ρ</i> = 0.742, <i>P</i> < 0.001). When patients were at the MOAA/S scores of 1 and 2, the median PSI was 50 (95% CI: 48 to 52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSI provides a useful and real-time monitoring of sedation for elderly patients undergoing ERCP. Our results showed a significant correlation between the PSI values and MOAA/S scores and suggested a PSI value of 50 with a range of 48 to 52 for maintaining adequate sedation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400079859).</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"20 ","pages":"137-145"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829650/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S504212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adequate sedation is important for elderly patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patient state index (PSI) via the SedLine® system has been utilized for real-time monitoring of anesthesia depth in surgical patients. We aimed to assess the correlation between PSI and Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores in elderly patients undergoing ERCP.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included 57 elderly patients scheduled for ERCP procedures. Patients received target-controlled infusion of propofol, titrated to the sedation level of MOAA/S scores of 1 and 2. The MOAA/S scores and PSI values were recorded during sedation and recovery. We also documented procedure and recovery time, oversedation (PSI < 25 for at least 10 min and EEG burst suppression), adverse events, and fatigue scores (0-10, higher scores indicating more fatigue).

Results: All patients completed this study (mean age of 73 years and 63% male), with a mean procedure time of 53 min and recovery time of 37 min. Five patients (8.8%) experienced PSI < 25 for at least 10 min, and three of them (5.3%) showed EEG burst suppression. No patients developed desaturation or intra-procedural awareness. Hypotension and abdominal pain were uncommon. Nine patients (15.8%) experienced mild dizziness or nausea. The median (IQR) fatigue score was 3 (2-4) at recovery room discharge. A significant correlation was observed between the MOAA/S scores and PSI values (Spearman correlation coefficient ρ = 0.742, P < 0.001). When patients were at the MOAA/S scores of 1 and 2, the median PSI was 50 (95% CI: 48 to 52).

Conclusion: PSI provides a useful and real-time monitoring of sedation for elderly patients undergoing ERCP. Our results showed a significant correlation between the PSI values and MOAA/S scores and suggested a PSI value of 50 with a range of 48 to 52 for maintaining adequate sedation.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400079859).

用PSI评估老年ERCP患者镇静深度:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:对于接受内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的老年患者,充分的镇静是很重要的。通过SedLine®系统的患者状态指数(PSI)已被用于手术患者麻醉深度的实时监测。我们的目的是评估老年ERCP患者的PSI与MOAA/S评分的相关性。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究包括57例计划进行ERCP手术的老年患者。患者接受异丙酚靶控输注,滴定至镇静水平,MOAA/S评分分别为1分和2分。在镇静和恢复期间记录MOAA/S评分和PSI值。我们还记录了手术过程和恢复时间、过度镇静(PSI < 25持续至少10分钟和脑电图爆发抑制)、不良事件和疲劳评分(0-10分,分数越高表明越疲劳)。结果:所有患者均完成本研究,平均年龄73岁,男性63%,平均手术时间53 min,恢复时间37 min。5例(8.8%)患者PSI < 25持续至少10 min,其中3例(5.3%)出现脑电图爆发抑制。无患者出现血饱和度降低或术中意识。低血压和腹痛不常见。9例患者(15.8%)出现轻度头晕或恶心。康复室出院时疲劳评分中位数(IQR)为3(2-4)。MOAA/S评分与PSI值存在显著相关(Spearman相关系数ρ = 0.742, P < 0.001)。当患者的MOAA/S评分为1和2时,中位PSI为50 (95% CI: 48至52)。结论:PSI为老年ERCP患者提供了一种有用的实时镇静监测方法。我们的研究结果显示PSI值与MOAA/S评分之间存在显著相关性,并建议PSI值为50,范围为48至52,以维持足够的镇静。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2400079859)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信