Predictors of Adolescents' Positive and Negative Risk-Taking: Similarities and Differences.

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Shuyi Gao, Tianxiao Wang, Baihan Sun, Danfeng Li
{"title":"Predictors of Adolescents' Positive and Negative Risk-Taking: Similarities and Differences.","authors":"Shuyi Gao, Tianxiao Wang, Baihan Sun, Danfeng Li","doi":"10.1002/jad.12482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The similarities and differences between positive (PRT) and negative risk-taking (NRT) remain unclear. The present study explored the issue in terms of sensation-seeking, impulse control, and peer factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adolescents from Liaoning, China, participated in a 2-year longitudinal study with two follow-up surveys. The initial sample in June 2022 included 339 adolescents aged 12-15 years (51% female, Mage = 13.38). The follow-up in June 2023 comprised 324 adolescents aged 13-16 years (52% female, Mage = 14.38) from the original sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) Sensation seeking was positively related to PRT and NRT, motor control was negatively related to both, whereas attentional control and planning were positively related to PRT and negatively related to NRT. Moreover, Planning (T1) positively predicted PRT (T2). Additionally, changes in sensation seeking positively predicted PRT and NRT (T2), and changes in impulse control negatively predicted both. (2) Only sensation seeking and motor control interaction negatively predicted NRT but positively predicted PRT. (3) Negative peer norms were positively related to PRT and NRT, and positive peer norms was negatively related to NRT. The positive predictive effect of peer norms (T1) disappeared.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRT and NRT were both associated with higher sensation seeking, lower motor control and higher negative peer norm. Unlike negative risk taking, positive risk taking was associated with higher planning, the interaction between sensation-seeking and motor control and friendship quality. Our findings provide new information on the nuances of impulse control and positive and negative risk-taking, and have implications for understanding and promoting positive adolescent risk-taking, and PRT is an adaptive and strategic behavior compared to negative risk-taking, which can be facilitated by an increase in the planning and quality of friendship.</p>","PeriodicalId":48397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The similarities and differences between positive (PRT) and negative risk-taking (NRT) remain unclear. The present study explored the issue in terms of sensation-seeking, impulse control, and peer factors.

Methods: Adolescents from Liaoning, China, participated in a 2-year longitudinal study with two follow-up surveys. The initial sample in June 2022 included 339 adolescents aged 12-15 years (51% female, Mage = 13.38). The follow-up in June 2023 comprised 324 adolescents aged 13-16 years (52% female, Mage = 14.38) from the original sample.

Results: (1) Sensation seeking was positively related to PRT and NRT, motor control was negatively related to both, whereas attentional control and planning were positively related to PRT and negatively related to NRT. Moreover, Planning (T1) positively predicted PRT (T2). Additionally, changes in sensation seeking positively predicted PRT and NRT (T2), and changes in impulse control negatively predicted both. (2) Only sensation seeking and motor control interaction negatively predicted NRT but positively predicted PRT. (3) Negative peer norms were positively related to PRT and NRT, and positive peer norms was negatively related to NRT. The positive predictive effect of peer norms (T1) disappeared.

Conclusions: PRT and NRT were both associated with higher sensation seeking, lower motor control and higher negative peer norm. Unlike negative risk taking, positive risk taking was associated with higher planning, the interaction between sensation-seeking and motor control and friendship quality. Our findings provide new information on the nuances of impulse control and positive and negative risk-taking, and have implications for understanding and promoting positive adolescent risk-taking, and PRT is an adaptive and strategic behavior compared to negative risk-taking, which can be facilitated by an increase in the planning and quality of friendship.

青少年积极和消极冒险行为的预测因素:异同。
正风险(PRT)和负风险(NRT)之间的异同尚不清楚。本研究从感觉寻求、冲动控制和同伴因素三个方面探讨了这一问题。方法:对来自中国辽宁省的青少年进行为期2年的纵向研究,并进行两次随访调查。2022年6月的初始样本包括339名12-15岁的青少年(51%为女性,Mage = 13.38)。在2023年6月的随访中,来自原始样本的324名13-16岁的青少年(52%为女性,Mage = 14.38)接受了随访。结果:(1)感觉寻求与PRT和NRT呈正相关,运动控制与PRT和NRT负相关,而注意控制和计划与PRT正相关,与NRT负相关。此外,计划(T1)正预测PRT (T2)。此外,感觉寻求的变化正预测PRT和NRT (T2),而冲动控制的变化负预测两者。(2)感觉寻求和运动控制交互作用负向预测NRT,正向预测PRT。(3)消极同伴规范与PRT和NRT呈正相关,积极同伴规范与NRT呈负相关。同伴规范(T1)的正向预测作用消失。结论:PRT和NRT均与高感觉寻求、低运动控制和高负性同伴规范相关。与消极的冒险行为不同,积极的冒险行为与更高的计划、感觉寻求和运动控制之间的相互作用以及友谊质量有关。我们的研究结果为冲动控制与积极和消极冒险之间的细微差别提供了新的信息,并对理解和促进青少年积极冒险具有启示意义。与消极冒险相比,PRT是一种适应性和战略性行为,可以通过增加友谊的计划和质量来促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescence
Journal of Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adolescence is an international, broad based, cross-disciplinary journal that addresses issues of professional and academic importance concerning development between puberty and the attainment of adult status within society. It provides a forum for all who are concerned with the nature of adolescence, whether involved in teaching, research, guidance, counseling, treatment, or other services. The aim of the journal is to encourage research and foster good practice through publishing both empirical and clinical studies as well as integrative reviews and theoretical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信